Archives
All posts for the day February 21st, 2022
“It’s political manipulation of scientific data like this that makes people not ‘trust the science,’” said J. Michael Waller, a senior analyst at the Center for Security Strategy, in a tweet. “It is unscientific to withhold data because people might disagree with your policies.”
Here you go ye Ukrainian petty fascists, do try to bother the civilians again. Go ahead against the Russian army ye pathetic cowards.
![](https://talesfromtheconspiratum.blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/image-1.png?w=720)
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1490459550511730689/Rvv7WOBu_bigger.jpg)
This is either the end of JustinTrudeau politically, or it is the end of Canada politically. And right now, Trudeau is doing everything he can to save himself, even if it means burning the country down in the process.
![](https://talesfromtheconspiratum.blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/image-2.png?w=1024)
By Eric Zuesse
Global Research, February 19, 2022
![](https://www.globalresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/biden-400x234.jpg)
***
Joe Biden told the American people, on 15 February 2022, “The United States and NATO are not a threat to Russia. … To the citizens of Russia: You are not our enemy.”
He expected Americans and Russians to believe that America’s anti-Russian military alliance (NATO) wasn’t hostile to Russia, wasn’t against it, didn’t consider it to be even an enemy (much less U.S/NATO’s main enemy, which is the case in their own actual policies).
How stupid are the public (both Americans and Russians) — that stupid?
Or was he (the U.S. President), instead, so stupid, himself, as to believe what he said?
If he wasn’t that stupid, then was he a liar? Could he have been both (stupid and a liar)? Could he have been actually a stupid liar? Is that the reality?
Russia might not be an enemy of America, but America is certainly very much an enemy of Russia, and makes this clear in everything that it does regarding Russia — not ONLY the many U.S. economic sanctions against Russia, but ALSO the many weapons (some being nuclear) that it places near to Russia’s borders, actually endangering Russians as much as the Soviet leader Khrushchev had been only intending to endanger Americans in the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis by arming a country near to America.
If America ultimately succeeds in getting Ukraine into NATO, then U.S. nuclear weapons would almost certainly become positioned even less than a 7-minute striking time away from Moscow and therefore achieve the U.S. Government’s objective of becoming able to launch against Russia a surprise nuclear attack that hits so fast it could eliminate Russia’s ability to launch its own (retaliatory) nukes — this objective, on the part of the U.S. Government (since around 2006), being called by American theorists “Nuclear Primacy”: the ability for the U.S. Government (supposedly) to ‘win’ a nuclear war against Russia: the ability to conquer Russia. None of this plan is official, but it has been U.S. Government policy unofficially, ever since approximately 2006.
So: it’s quite reasonable for Putin now to be demanding that this 1962 Cuban-Missile-Crisis-in-reverse not be allowed, and he wants the U.S. Government and its NATO military alliance to remove from near Russia’s border ALL military hardware they’ve positioned there, and to promise in writing that they will NEVER again place such weapons and forces there.
Previously, however, the U.S. Government proved that it lies blatantly, and so even a written U.S./NATO promise of that wouldn’t actually be reliable. Therefore Biden’s saying that “The United States and NATO are not a threat to Russia. … To the citizens of Russia: You are not our enemy.” is fully in accord with the record of all recent American Presidents, which is a record of blatant lying. For example:
U.S. President George W. Bush seems to have been informed, in advance, about a New York Times article (which was the lead-story in the newspaper on Sunday, 8 September 2002), titled “U.S. SAYS HUSSEIN INTENSIFIES QUEST FOR A-BOMB PARTS”, in which the sources were anonymous “Administration officials.” The story concerned “aluminum tubes” that were “intended as casing for rotors in centrifuges, which are one means of producing highly enriched uranium … to make an atomic bomb, Bush administration officials said today.”
We just heard the Prime Minister talk about the new report. I would remind you that when the inspectors first went into Iraq and were denied — finally denied access, a report came out of the Atomic — the IAEA that they were six months away from developing a weapon. I don’t know what more evidence we need [in order for Congress to authorize an invasion of Iraq].
PRIME MINISTER BLAIR: Absolutely right.
Then, as soon as the weekend was over, on Monday 9 September 2002, was issued by the IAEA the following:
Related Coverage: Director General’s statement on Iraq to the IAEA Board of Governors on 9 September 2002 [this being a republication of their notice three days earlier, on 6 Sep.].
Vienna, 06 September, 2002 – With reference to an article published today in the New York Times [which, as usual, stenographically reported the Administration’s false allegations, which the IAEA was trying to correct in a way that would minimally offend the NYT and the U.S. President], the International Atomic Energy Agency would like to state that it has no new information on Iraq’s nuclear programme since December 1998 when its inspectors left Iraq [and verified that no WMD remained there at that time]. Only through a resumption of inspections in accordance with Security Council Resolution 687 and other relevant resolutions can the Agency draw any conclusion with regard to Iraq’s compliance with its obligations under the above resolutions relating to its nuclear activities.
Contact: Mark Gwozdecky, Tel: (+43 1) 2600-21270, e-mail: M.Gwozdecky@iaea.org.
Polls Increasingly Confirming that America Is a Dictatorship
It even linked to the following statement from the IAEA Director General amplifying it:
Since December 1998 when our inspectors left Iraq, we have no additional information that can be directly linked without inspection to Iraq’s nuclear activities. I should emphasize that it is only through resumption of inspections that the Agency can draw any conclusion or provide any assurance regarding Iraq’s compliance with its obligations under these resolutions.
So, this was proof of the falsehood of Bush’s and Blair’s reference, on September 7th, to the IAEA, in which Bush-Blair were saying that, upon the authority of the IAEA itself, there was “the new report … a report came out of the Atomic — the IAEA that they were six months away from developing a weapon. I don’t know what more evidence we need.”
Because of the news-media’s ignoring the IAEA’s denial of the President’s statement, the author of the IAEA’s denial, Mark Gwozdecky, spoke again nearly three weeks later, by phone, with the only journalist who was interested, Joseph Curl of the Washington Times, who headlined on 27 September 2002, “Agency Disavows Report on Iraq Arms” — perhaps that should instead have been “President Lied About ‘Saddam’s WMD’” — and Curl quoted Gwozdecky: “There’s never been a report like that [which Bush alleged] issued from this agency. … When we left in December ’98 we had concluded that we had neutralized their nuclear-weapons program.
We had confiscated their fissile material. We had destroyed all their key buildings and equipment.” Other news-media failed to pick up Curl’s article. And, even in that article, there was no clear statement that the President had, in fact, lied — cooked up an IAEA ‘report’ that never actually existed. Actually, the IAEA hadn’t even so much as been mentioned in that New York Times article.
Bush had simply lied, and Blair seconded it, and the ‘news’-media stenographically accepted it, and broadcasted their lies to the public, and continued to do so, despite the IAEA’s having denied, as early as September 6th, that they had issued any such “new report” at all. (The IAEA had, apparently, somehow known in advance that someone would soon be saying that the IAEA had issued a report alleging that Iraq was resuming its nuclear program.) Virtually all of the alleged news-media (and not only the NYT) entirely ignored the IAEA’s denial (though it was not merely one bullet, but rapidly fired on four separate occasions, into the wilderness of America’s ‘news’-media) that it had issued any such “report.” All of them were actually only propaganda-media: they hid the fact that George W. Bush was simply lying. Both the U.S. Government and its media were frauds.
The day after that 7 September 2002 unquestioned lie by Bush, saying Iraq was only six months from having a nuclear weapon, and citing the IAEA as his source for that, the New York Times ran their article. It included such hair-raisers as “‘The jewel in the crown is nuclear,’ a senior administration official said. ‘The closer he gets to a nuclear capability, the more credible is his threat to use chemical or biological weapons. Nuclear weapons are his hole card.’” The fake ‘news’ — stenography from the lying Government and its chosen lying sources (in this case anonymous Administration-officials) — came in an incessant stream, from the U.S. Government and its ‘news’ media (such as happened also later, regarding Honduras 2009, Libya 2011, Yemen 2011-, Syria 2011-, Ukraine 2014, and Yemen 2015-). Do the American people never learn — ever — that their Presidents and ‘news’-media) now lie routinely?
Also on Sunday, September 8th, of 2002, the Bush Administration’s big guns were firing off against Iraq from the Sunday ‘news’ shows; and National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice delivered her famous “we don’t want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud” statement, which was clearly building upon the lying Bush allegation of the day before, that the International Atomic Energy Agency had just come up with this ominous “Atomic” “new report.”
Then, President Bush himself, on 12 September 2002, addressed the U.N. General Assembly, seeking authorization to invade:
We will work with the U.N. Security Council for the necessary resolutions. But the purposes of the United States should not be doubted. The Security Council resolutions will be enforced — the just demands of peace and security will be met — or action will be unavoidable. And a regime that has lost its legitimacy will also lose its power.
Events can turn in one of two ways: If we fail to act in the face of danger, the people of Iraq will continue to live in brutal submission. The regime will have new power to bully and dominate and conquer its neighbors, condemning the Middle East to more years of bloodshed and fear. The regime will remain unstable — the region will remain unstable, with little hope of freedom, and isolated from the progress of our times. With every step the Iraqi regime takes toward gaining and deploying the most terrible weapons, our own options to confront that regime will narrow. And if an emboldened regime were to supply these weapons to terrorist allies, then the attacks of September the 11th would be a prelude to far greater horrors.
Bush (and Blair) failed to win any authorization to invade, but did it anyway. They should be hung for it. They were atop a bi-national and entirely bipartisan (in each of the two countries) public-deception operation, like had occurred in Germany during Hitler’s time. (Hitler was a boon for the nation’s armaments-makers then, just as America’s Presidents now are for America’s armaments-firms.)
And both of America’s political Parties are controlled by their billionaires, who fund the political careers of the politicians whom those mega-donors want to become s‘elected’ by the public to win public offices. For example, whereas George W. Bush lied America into invading and destroying Iraq, Barack Obama and Joe Biden lied America into believing that their coup overthrowing and replacing Ukraine’s democratically elected Government in February 2014 was instead a ‘democratic revolution’ there. It’s so bad that even the progressive Democratic Party site, David Sirota’s “The Daily Poster,” has NEVER exposed anything about that Obama coup and about those Obama-Clinton-Biden lies about Ukraine, and about the U.S.
Government’s planned conquest of both Russia and China — the things that might actually produce WW III (in other words: are even more important than what they do report about).
In fact, Sirota had the nerve, on 15 February 2022, to post to Vimeo an anti-Republican-Party propaganda video, “The Pundits Who Lied America Into A War”, against the Republican Party’s liars who deceived the American people into invading and destroying Iraq in 2003 — though almost all leading Democrats, including Joe Biden, and Hillary Clinton, had voted in the U.S. Senate for (not against) that lie-based invasion, and though all Democratic-Party ‘news’-media (and not ONLY the Republican-Party ones) unquestioningly transmitted the Bush-Administration’s lies to the American people, against Iraq, in order to fool Americans into supporting the then-upcoming U.S. invasion.
That Sirota video entirely ignores the Democratic-Party “Pundits” — such as the Party’s think tank, the Brookings Institution, whose Michael O’Hanlon and Kenneth Pollack, propagandized on TV and elsewhere to invade Iraq (such as in Pollack’s Council on Foreign Relations article, “Invasion the Only Realistic Option to Head Off the Threat from Iraq, Argues Kenneth Pollack in The Threatening Storm” did). Whereas Democrats blame Republicans, and Republicans blame Democrats, it’s the billionaires of BOTH Parties who actually fund all of these lies and liars — and who continue to fund those liars’ careers, and to present them on their ’news’-media as ‘experts’, to fool the public to okay the trillions of dollars that the U.S. Government pays to those billionaires’ corporations such as Lockheed Martin, to profit from those wars. It’s hypocrisy on top of lying, so as to convey an impression that neoconservatism — U.S. imperialism — is a ‘Republican’ (or else a ‘Democratic’) evil, when it’s ACTUALLY an evil by the billionaires who fund BOTH Parties AND who fund the ’news’-media, both liberal and conservative, and who profit from those invasions. It’s not just the lies of America’s Presidents; it is the lies that are funded by America’s billionaires, who placed such people as that into Congress and the White House.
This regime is an aristocracy, and imperialism is second nature to aristocrats. But an aristocracy is a dictatorship by the very rich — NOT any sort of democracy. This is the type of dictatorship that America now has — NOT a Republican dictatorship, or a Democratic dictatorship, but a dictatorship by the aristocracy, of BOTH Parties. They have made a mockery of their ‘democracy’. Practically everything they do is fake, except the vast harms that they produce.
*
Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author of They’re Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010, and of CHRIST’S VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity.
![Canada Shocks the World](https://dweaay7e22a7h.cloudfront.net/wp-content_3/uploads/2022/02/Canada-Shocks-the-World-650x360.jpg)
![James Howard Kunstler](https://dweaay7e22a7h.cloudfront.net/wp-content_3/author-photos_135/dr2/JamesHowardKunstler.jpg)
BY JAMES HOWARD KUNSTLER
FEBRUARY 12, 2022
I’ve said it over and over again: History is a prankster. It can surprise you at the darndest times.
Who would have guessed that Canada, demure, inoffensive, shrinking violet among nations, would rise to lead a worldwide revolt against the Satanic dominion of digital neo-Bolshevism?
I’m talking about the Canadian truckers’ protest against the pernicious mandates.
Yes, the meek Canadians are standing up against the mass psychosis that’s swept Western civilization. The one that seeks to destroy every constitutional liberty; deprive citizens of life, property and even language; and reduce every individual to an internet-surveilled and controlled automaton.
Well, now it has happened, and the head of Canada’s government, Justin Trudeau — arguably the most foolish would-be tyrant in the former “Free World” — has finally emerged from his hidey-hole where he’d been recovering from the virus — to denounce the truckers as racist, white supremacist enemies of democracy.
He was triple-vaxxed but he got the virus anyway. Of course, he insists everyone else be fully vaxxed also — so that they don’t catch or spread the virus. Can you say, “cognitive dissonance”? How about a little self-awareness, Mr. Trudeau?
It’s rumored that the Canadian military told Mr. Trudeau in plain un-woke Canadian English to eff-off. They will not take orders to put down the truckers’ protest, and even the Mounties are wobbling, so it’s left to the Ottawa police, who threaten to arrest anyone aiding the truckers with food, water and fuel.
Wait and see how quickly that will turn to fighting in the streets. Constitutional crisis, ay? But let’s look beyond Canada…
Progress, but Not Enough
A dozen or so other members of the Western Civ Club of Nations are ditching their COVID-19 mandates and restrictions. The reason: Despite the mighty forces of deliberate organized propaganda and resulting mass delusion, the COVID-19 “vaccines” are finally revealed as an epic fail.
Not only do they not stop you from getting or passing along the virus, but they’re a potential danger to all who submitted to them. They’re an insult to the age-old accumulated intelligence of the human race as used to be represented by science, ethics and law.
And still, America’s own “leader,” the empty suit known as “Joe Biden,” has the temerity to go on TV and once again tell his hapless people to “get vaccinated… get your kids vaccinated!”
Who does he think he’s speaking to? The counter-information to Tony Fauci’s criminal BS is flooding the zone, despite America’s sinister Intel Community attempting to control the discredited legacy news media.
Just last week CBS’ 60 Minutes told its audience that our hospitals are overwhelmed by the unvaccinated with COVID, which is an outright lie. Maybe we should start asking: Who are the individual producers and network executives responsible for this unadulterated mendacity?
Would it be interesting to see them in a court of law, having to answer whether they believe their own lies? Or is someone telling them to sell them?
Whoa!
Meanwhile, some explosive counter-information to The Official Narrative emerged last week from the U.S. military’s own Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED).
Several whistleblower doctors revealed to attorney Tom Renz heretofore suppressed statistics on the shocking increase in vaccine injuries among young, otherwise able-bodied soldiers.
Have a look at the list of serious side effects the vaccines have caused:
- Total Number of Diseases and Injuries Reported by Year (Hospitalization) up 37%
- Diseases of the Nervous System by Year up 968%
- Malignant Neuroendocrine Tumor Reports by Year up 276%
- Acute Myocardial Infarction Reports by Year up 343%
- Acute Myocarditis Reports by Year up 184%
- Acute Pericarditis Reports by Year up 70%
- Pulmonary Embolism Reports by Year up 260%
- Congenital Malformations Reports by Year up 87%
- Nontraumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Reports by Year up 227%
- Anxiety Reports by Year up 2,361%
- Suicide Reports by Year up 227%
- Neoplasms for All Cancers by Year up 218%
- Malignant Neoplasms for Digestive Organs by Year up 477%
- Neoplasms for Breast Cancer by Year up 469%
- Neoplasms for Testicular Cancer by Year up 298%
- Female Infertility Reports by Year up 419%
- Dysmenorrhea Reports by Year up 221.5%
- Ovarian Dysfunction Reports by Year up 299%
- Spontaneous Abortion Reports by Year DOWN by 10%
- Male Infertility Reports by Year up 320%
- Guillain-Barré Syndrome Reports by Year up 520%
- Acute Transverse Myelitis Reports by Year up 494%
- Seizure Reports by Year up 298%
- Narcolepsy and Cataplexy Reports by Year up 352%
- Rhabdomyolysis by Year up 672%
- Multiple Sclerosis Reports by Year up 614%
- Migraine Reports by Year up 352%
- Blood Disorder Reports by Year up 204%
- Hypertension (High Blood Pressure) Reports by Year up 2,130%
- Cerebral Infarct Reports by Year up 294%.
Starting to get the picture? Of course, the vaccine fanatics try to write it all off as coincidence. Do you believe them? Why would anyone at this point?
Downright Criminal
This is not the first time the nation has learned about vaccine injuries — the CDC’s VAERS registry has reported massive problems with the Moderna, Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson “vaccines” since early summer of 2021. (In fact, adverse events are notoriously under-reported by perhaps 100 times.)
Now the FDA has gone and issued a full approval of the Moderna vaccine, without convening the customary expert advisory panel. The documents explaining the FDA’s decision were scrubbed from the FDA’s website.
The FDA spox responded to questions about it saying, “We are aware of the issue and hope to have the document reposted as soon as possible.” So far, the docs are still missing in action.
The primary objective of this approval seems to be adding the Moderna mRNA vax to the protocol for children, which would permit the disabling and murder of millions of innocents.
This is exactly what “Joe Biden” is calling for. And by the way, adding it to the children’s vaccine schedule supposedly continues Moderna’s shield of immunity from lawsuits. Just remember: In law, fraud vitiates that protection.
“The Disillusionment Will Be Cosmic”
We now enter a period of danger as the sleepwalkers of America awaken from their induced consensus trance and begin to understand how they were harmed, swindled and robbed by a corrupt, criminal officialdom.
It will hurt badly because the public wanted so desperately to believe that vaccines would make them safe from the mysteriously conjured COVID-19 virus — and, more than that, would cure their gnawing anxiety over the wreckage of American life caused by what appears to be leadership hostage to sinister forces.
I must say, I believe the truth of our predicament will grow a whole lot weirder as we stumble into springtime. The weirdest part of all will be when America learns exactly who and what have been the prime generators of our disorder.
The disillusionment will be cosmic.
Regards,
James Howard Kunstler
for The Daily Reckoning
![](https://www.volcast.com/pics/button_speaker_174x40_1x1.png?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lewrockwell.com%2F2022%2F02%2Fvasko-kohlmayer%2Fstriking-evidence-of-covid-vaccines-failure%2F)
A website called The Expose presents eye-opening evidence of vaccine failure in England. It does this by using the numbers reported by the British Government via its public health arm called the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA).
In case you do not know, the UKHSA “publishes a weekly Vaccine Surveillance Report, with each report containing four weeks’ worth of data on Covid-19 cases, hospitalisations, and deaths by vaccination status.”
Using the data supplied by the UKHSA for week 5 of 2022, The Expose constructed the chart below. It depicts Covid case rates per 100K people for three groups: unvaccinated (green), double vaccinated (red), and triple vaccinated (maroon).
![](https://lrc-cdn.s3.amazonaws.com/assets/2022/02/Picture1-1-620x463.jpg)
The chart shows that those who have been injected with the Covid vaccines are much more likely to contract Covid-19 than those who have not been injected. This may come as a shock to true believers, but it is a fact that a vaccinated person in England is more likely to test positive for SARS-CoV-2 than their unvaccinated counterparts.
This means that the Covid vaccines have negative efficacy vis-à-vis infection. The double vaccinated posted the highest rate of this disease followed by the triple vaccinated. The unvaccinated are by far the safest cohort as far as infection is concerned.
As we can see, receiving a Covid-19 vaccine makes people more prone to contracting Covid-19. Apparently, the vaccines weaken one’s immune system so that it is less able to ward off the disease. Thus, not only do the vaccines not protect against the illness – as all good vaccines should do – but they increase one’s vulnerability to it.
Before we move further, just a couple of quick observations:
Do you remember when they claimed that this was the pandemic of the unvaccinated? This was never true. If anything, it is now more a pandemic of the vaccinated. Their constant efforts to deceive the public shows that the vaccinators and their collaborators in the media, public health and politics are inveterate liars and gaslighters.
Secondly, the data makes it clear that vaccine passports make no sense. The justification for the vaccine passport rests on the assumption that its bearer is free of infection because the vaccine will protect him from contracting the virus. This has been mostly true for all the other vaccines in history, but it is most definitely not true for the experimental Covid vaccines, which actually make people more likely to become infected. When Boris Johnson cancelled the vaccines passports in England last month, he was the first world leader to act in accordance with reason and science.
Given what we are seeing now, however, it may be necessary to reinstitute some form of vaccine passport, but for the opposite reason than the original one. We may need to know who the most likely super spreaders are. This would be the vaccinated.
Be that as it may, The Expose presents an even more powerful graphic of vaccinal failure. This chart shows the death rate for the double vaccinated (red) versus the unvaccinated (green).
![](https://lrc-cdn.s3.amazonaws.com/assets/2022/02/Picture2-1-620x475.jpg)
As you can see, for all age cohorts above 50 – which is where the vast majority of Covid deaths occur – the death rates are consistently higher among the double vaccinated.
This means that if you are a British person who is 50 years of age or older and have received two doses of Covid vaccines, you are more likely to die of Covid-19 than those who have received none. And that differential is quite substantial. In the 70 to 79 cohort, the death rate among those who received two doses is double that of the unvaccinated; in the 80+ cohort it is even higher.
This being said, the UKHSA data also shows that the death rate for those who have received three doses of the vaccines is lower than the rates for both the double vaccinated and unvaccinated. The Expose does not provide us with a graphic for this subset of data, but this is not necessary in order to understand the data’s distressing implications.
The vaccines provide some level of protection against death (but not against infection) which, however, is of limited duration. The protective effect lasts for several months, and then wanes dramatically. It, however, does not just disappear but turns negative, making people more vulnerable to both infection and death. In other words, in a relatively short period of time – six to eight months – the shots weaken and undermine the human immune system making it more vulnerable to the ravages of the very disease against which they were meant to protect.
The only way to prevent this from happening is to receive a booster. The trouble with the booster, however, is essentially the same as with the initial shots. Its protective efficacy wanes and then turns negative again, which is why some people in England have already been administered a second booster (their fourth Covid shot in less than fourteen months). The problem is that the efficacy of the boosters is even more short-lived than that of the original two shots. This why the panicked and desperate British officials suggested in November of last year that the British people would be eligible for boosters every three months.
As things stand now, those who received their third or fourth shot less than three months ago are still to some degree protected against death. This situation, however, will soon change and the boostered will then be more likely to die from Covid than the unvaccinated. If they want to forestall this situation, they will have to get another shot and repeat the whole cycle. This will give them a few months’ worth of protection which will then turn negative. If they wish to be “protected” again, they will have to get yet another booster and so on.
This, however, cannot go on indefinitely, because evidence shows that repeated mRNA injections undermine and weaken the human immune system to the point of destruction. This is why the European Medicines Agency (EMA) warned that “frequent Covid-19 booster shots could adversely affect the immune system and may not be feasible. Repeat booster doses every four months could eventually weaken the immune system and tire out people.”
This important piece of information was reported by Bloomberg in a wire titled “Frequent boosters spur warning on immune response.” The piece goes on to quote Marco Cavaleri, the Head of Biological Health Threats and Vaccines Strategy at EMA, who said that boosters “can be done once, or maybe twice, but it’s not something that we can think should be repeated constantly.”
It is precisely for this reason that the health authorities in a number of countries have said that the fourth shot may not be “necessary.” They are using this kind of evasive language because they are afraid to openly admit the truth. The fact is that none of these shots were necessary for the vast majority of people. To inject more than half of the world’s population with insufficiently tested and experimental pharmaceuticals for a disease whose survival is more than 99.8 percent in the healthy is one of the greatest crimes ever committed against humanity.
Tragically, there are hundreds of thousands of people in developed countries who have already received a fourth dose and have thus maxed out. When the protective effect of that dose wears off, they will find themselves in a bad situation. With their immune system weakened, they will be more vulnerable to Covid and a host of other diseases. And yet they can still thank God, for unlike hundreds of thousands of their fellow citizens they did not die of clots, strokes, heart attacks and other side effects from the multiple doses of these beyond-few-months ineffective and dangerous vaccines.
The predicament of the current crop of double boosterees is the eventual fate of everyone who got caught up on the Covid-19 vaccination train.
This is the public health disaster that the vaccinators have wrought.
Vasko Kohlmayer (email) was born and grew up in former communist Czechoslovakia. You can follow his writings by subscribing to his Substack newsletter ’Notes from the Twilight Zone’. He is the author of The West in Crisis: Civilizations and Their Death Drives.
Copyright © Vasko Kohlmayer
SUNDAY, FEB 20, 2022
Credit Suisse has had an extremely difficult year already, but on Sunday, dozens of respected newspapers and other media organizations from around the globe dealt Switzerland’s second-largest bank by assets a major blow: releasing reporting on leaked banking records involving 18,000 clients considered “sensitive” for their ties to corrupt government officials, Middle Eastern autocrats or foreign spymasters.
“Suisse Secrets” – as the leak is being called – was coordinated by the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project, the same organization that spearheaded “the Pandora Papers” and the “Pegasus Project”, two earlier major leaks involving topics ranging from official corruption to illicit software-enabled surveillance. Like “Pandora” and the “Panama Papers” leaks, the records exposed in “Suisse Secrets” are mostly financial data, like bank account information, as well as evidence of internal red flags that were routinely raised – and routinely ignored.
![](https://assets.zerohedge.com/s3fs-public/styles/inline_image_mobile/public/inline-images/CS3_7.jpg?itok=3Fi7r1XW)
The statistics from the leak are staggering: 18K accounts, $100 billion in aggregate assets, some of the accounts dated back to the 1940s, but even the most recent details date to the mid-2010s, allowing Credit Suisse’s PR team enough plausible deniability to insist that most of the accounts exposed in the leak have already been closed.
Clients identified in the leak included easily identifiable leaders like Jordan’s King Abdullah II as well as shadowy Pakistani intelligence chief General Akhtar Abdur Rahman Khan.
Before we break down the findings of the report, it’s worth noting that a CS spokeswoman said the bank “strongly rejects” the reports’ characterization of the bank’s “business practices.”
Candice Sun, a spokeswoman for the bank, said in a statement that “Credit Suisse strongly rejects the allegations and inferences about the bank’s purported business practices.” She said many of the accounts in the leak date back decades to “a time where laws, practices and expectations of financial institutions were very different from where they are now.”
Ms. Sun said that while Credit Suisse can’t comment on specific clients, many of the accounts identified in the leaked database have already been closed. “Of the remaining active accounts, we are comfortable that appropriate due diligence, reviews and other control related steps were taken, including pending account closures,” she said.
Ms. Sun added that the leak appears to be part of “a concerted effort to discredit the bank and the Swiss financial marketplace, which has undergone significant changes over the last several years.”
Switzerland’s banking secrecy laws have long made it a haven for stashing ill-gotten gains. Back in 2014, however, US authorities started cracking down on American customers of Swiss banks, and eventually, CS struck a settlement where it paid billions in restitution. But the DoJ and Senate Finance Committee are investigating whether Americans continue to hold unregistered assets at the bank. Meanwhile, it recently went on trial for helping a Bulgarian wrestling star/cocaine trafficker launder millions.
Without further ado, the following are some of the individuals named in the leak:
- Nervis Villalobos – a former Venezuelan vice minister of energy, CS opened an account for Villalobos in 2011 into which he deposited millions despite red flags from compliance that the money had resulted from public corruption.
- Alaa and Gamal Mubarak – the sons of former Egyptian strongman Hosni Mubarak, Alaa and Gamal held six accounts at various points including one containing nearly $200 million in 2003.
- King Abdullah II of Jordan – one of the few officials in the leaks who remains in power, had six accounts, including one whose balance exceeded $224 million.
- General Akhtar Abdur Rahman Khan – A Pakistani intelligence chief from the 1980s who helped funnel US arms and money to the mujahideen soldiers fighting an insurgency against the Soviet-backed government in Afghanistan and the Soviet military. Interestingly, in 1985, the same year President Ronald Reagan called for more oversight of the aid going into Afghanistan, an account was opened in the name of three of General Khan’s sons. Years later, the account would grow to hold $3.7 million.
- Saad Kheir – the head of Jordan’s intelligence agency, opened an account in 2003, the same year the US invaded Iraq, that would eventually hold $21.6 million.
- Billy Rautenbach – a notorious mining magnate who was eventually sanctioned by the US for his role in financing the violent outbursts around Zimbabwe’s 2008 election. The accounts were opened weeks before a mining deal funneled $100 million to the government of former Zimbabwean strongman Robert Mugabe and his government, according to the OCCRP.
- Rza and Seymur Talibov – the sons of an Azerbaijani strongman received roughly $20 million in suspicious wire transfers.
- Rodoljub Radulović – a.k.a. Misha Banana, the Balkan gangster and drug smuggler controlled two accounts at Credit Suisse, with one holding almost 3.4 million Swiss francs.
Readers looking for a more complete breakdown can find one on the OCCRP’s site here.
Of the dozens of news organizations who were provided documents from the “Suisse Secrets” leak, none were Swiss. This is by design since Switzerland has strict laws barring journalists from writing about leaked bank records.
Those bank secrecy laws cut both ways.
VAERS data released Friday by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention included a total of 1,119,063 reports of adverse events from all age groups following COVID vaccines, including 23,990 deaths and 192,517 serious injuries between Dec. 14, 2020, and Feb. 11, 2022.
Feb 20, 2022
![Every Friday, VAERS publishes vaccine injury reports received as of a specified date.](https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/Covid-vaccine-VAERS-021822-feature-800x417.jpg)
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) today released new data showing a total of 1,119,063 reports of adverse events following COVID vaccines were submitted between Dec. 14, 2020, and Feb. 11, 2022, to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). VAERS is the primary government-funded system for reporting adverse vaccine reactions in the U.S.
The data included a total of 23,990 reports of deaths — an increase of 375 over the previous week — and 192,517 reports of serious injuries, including deaths, during the same time period — up 4,382 compared with the previous week.
Excluding “foreign reports” to VAERS, 760,102 adverse events, including 10,909 deaths and 79,111 serious injuries, were reported in the U.S. between Dec. 14, 2020, and Feb. 11, 2022.
Foreign reports are reports foreign subsidiaries send to U.S. vaccine manufacturers. Under U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations, if a manufacturer is notified of a foreign case report that describes an event that is both serious and does not appear on the product’s labeling, the manufacturer is required to submit the report to VAERS.
Of the 10,909 U.S. deaths reported as of Feb. 11, 18% occurred within 24 hours of vaccination, 23% occurred within 48 hours of vaccination and 60% occurred in people who experienced an onset of symptoms within 48 hours of being vaccinated.
In the U.S., 546 million COVID vaccine doses had been administered as of Feb. 11, including 321 million doses of Pfizer, 206 million doses of Moderna and 18 million doses of Johnson & Johnson (J&J).
![From the 2/11/22 release of VAERS data](https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/vaers-vaccine-injury-february-18-2022-300x246.jpg)
Every Friday, VAERS publishes vaccine injury reports received as of a specified date. Reports submitted to VAERS require further investigation before a causal relationship can be confirmed. Historically, VAERS has been shown to report only 1% of actual vaccine adverse events.
U.S. VAERS data from Dec. 14, 2020, to Feb. 11, 2022, for 5- to 11-year-olds show:
- 8,173 adverse events, including 179 rated as serious and 3 reported deaths.
The most recent death involves a 7-year-old girl (VAERS I.D. 1975356) from Minnesota who died 11 days after receiving her first dose of Pfizer’s COVID vaccine when she was found unresponsive by her mother. An autopsy is pending.
- 16 reports of myocarditis and pericarditis (heart inflammation).
- 29 reports of blood clotting disorders.
U.S. VAERS data from Dec. 14, 2020, to Feb. 11, 2022, for 12- to 17-year-olds show:
- 29,154 adverse events, including 1,675 rated as serious and 38 reported deaths.
The most recent deaths involve a 13-year-old male (VAERS I.D. 2042005) from an unidentified state who died from a sudden heart attack seven months after receiving his second dose of Moderna, and a 17-year-old female from an unidentified state (VAERS I.D. 2039111) who died after receiving her first dose of Moderna. Medical information was limited and it is unknown if an autopsy was performed in either case.
- 68 reports of anaphylaxis among 12- to 17-year-olds where the reaction was life-threatening, required treatment or resulted in death — with 96% of cases attributed to Pfizer’s vaccine.
- 639 reports of myocarditis and pericarditis with 627 cases attributed to Pfizer’s vaccine.
- 158 reports of blood clotting disorders, with all cases attributed to Pfizer.
U.S. VAERS data from Dec. 14, 2020, to Feb. 11, 2022, for all age groups combined, show:
- 19% of deaths were related to cardiac disorders.
- 54% of those who died were male, 41% were female and the remaining death reports did not include the gender of the deceased.
- The average age of death was 72.7.
- As of Feb. 11, 5,086 pregnant women reported adverse events related to COVID vaccines, including 1,635 reports of miscarriage or premature birth.
- Of the 3,557 cases of Bell’s Palsy reported, 51% were attributed to Pfizer vaccinations, 40% to Moderna and 8% to J&J.
- 851 reports of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), with 40% of cases attributed to Pfizer, 30% to Moderna and 28% to J&J.
- 2,323 reports of anaphylaxis where the reaction was life-threatening, required treatment or resulted in death.
- 1,592 reports of myocardial infarction.
- 13,102 reports of blood clotting disorders in the U.S. Of those, 5,846 reports were attributed to Pfizer, 4,670 reports to Moderna and 2,542 reports to J&J.
- 3,992 cases of myocarditis and pericarditis with 2,456 cases attributed to Pfizer, 1,335 cases to Moderna and 170 cases to J&J’s COVID vaccine.
Pfizer and BioNTech Omicron-targeted COVID vaccine delayed
Pfizer and BioNTech’s new vaccine specific to the Omicron variant was delayed by several weeks due to a “slower-than-expected” data gathering process, Ugur Sahin, BioNTech’s CEO said Thursday.
Once a new vaccine is ready the company said it will consider whether a variant-specific vaccine was still needed, Sahin said.
“If the wave ends, that does not mean it can’t begin again,” he said, adding BioNTech could create new vaccines as variants emerge.
“I really don’t see the situation as dramatic anymore,” Sahin said, referring to how the COVID would develop in future. Pfizer and BioNTech had originally planned to release a new vaccine by the end of March, but said it was dependent on how much clinical data regulators would require.
Autopsies show two teen boys died of heart inflammation caused by Pfizer vaccine
Pathologists who examined the autopsies of two teenage boys who died days after receiving Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine concluded the vaccine caused the teens’ deaths.
The three pathologists, two of whom are medical examiners, published their findings Feb. 14 in an early online release article, “Autopsy Histopathologic Cardiac Findings in Two Adolescents Following the Second COVID-19 Vaccine Dose,” in the Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine.
The authors’ findings were conclusive. Two teenage boys were pronounced dead in their homes three and four days after receiving the second Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 dose.
There was no evidence of active or previous COVID-19 infection.
The teens had negative toxicology screens (i.e. no drugs or poisons were present in their bodies).
Judge blocks Air Force from punishing officer who refused COVID vaccine for religious reasons
Federal judge Tillman E. Self III issued a preliminary injunction for an Air Force Reserve officer who was denied a religious exemption from the military’s COVID vaccine mandate, calling the military’s process for granting religious exemption “illusory and insincere.”
The judge said the Air Force likely violated the officer’s First Amendment rights when it denied her request for a religious exemption and subsequently appeal, and ordered the branch to refrain from taking “any adverse action” against the officer on the basis of “this lawsuit or her request for religious accommodation, specifically including forcing her to retire.”
As of Feb. 8, the Air Force had only approved 3,313 vaccine exemptions, but they were granted for medical or nonreligious administrative reasons. At the time the unnamed officer filed her lawsuit on Jan. 6, the Air Force had not granted any religious accommodations.
To date, the Air Force has granted only nine religious exemptions, denied 3,665 requests and is still considering 3,288 requests — 142 active-duty airmen have been administratively separated for refusing the vaccine, the branch said in its COVID update last week.
Children’s Health Defense asks anyone who has experienced an adverse reaction, to any vaccine, to file a report following these three steps.
![Megan Redshaw's avatar](https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/megan_redshaw-150x150.jpg)
Megan Redshaw is a freelance reporter for The Defender. She has a background in political science, a law degree and extensive training in natural health.
The CDC and Wall St. Journal both say serious side effects from the COVID vaccines are extremely rare. They are lying. But now we have unassailable proof from the Israeli government!
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/how-rare-are-vaccine-side-effects?utm_source=url Steve Kirsch Feb 21, 2022 | 14559 |
![](https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F0736fde5-6ffa-401d-b142-bbd62554b68a_1617x905.png)
This article, by Wall Street Journal staff writer Jenny Strasburg (see Covid-19 Vaccines Were Deadly in Rare Cases. Governments Are Now Weighing Compensation) says:
Serious side effects so far have been very rare—estimated at roughly one to 11 per 100,000 doses for some of the more serious harmful reactions identified by regulators in the most-affected age groups, according to U.S. and European government officials and researchers. They include blood clotting, nervous-system disorders and heart problems, all of which also can be caused by Covid itself.
Similarly, a story in The Epoch Times entitled “US Agencies Quietly Studying Reports of Post-Vaccination Neurological Issues” also revealed that there are some side-effects and they are really rare, but the CDC is studying them. That article says this:
The CDC lists only one adverse event as likely having “a causal relationship” with a vaccine. That’s TTS and the Johnson & Johnson shot.
The CDC and Wall St. Journal are both lying to you. Big time.
The truth is the vaccines are an unmitigated disaster. The most dangerous vaccines in human history. They should be immediately halted.
But the mainstream media is completely silent and totally ignored this study because it goes against the narrative.
Here’s the proof… right from the Israeli Ministry of Health
The latest proof of that comes from the Israeli Ministry of Health who did something that no government agency has ever done before: did a proactive survey of people who got the booster (instead of using a passive surveillance system like everyone else does). This is the only way to get true rate data since you know the denominator.
The reason no government ever did this before is because they knew it would show the vaccines were a disaster. So if they never looked, they can plausibly say, “we had no idea.”
Obviously, something went wrong and the government of Israel did a proactive survey, something all governments in the world should have done at the very start of the vaccination program.
For passive surveillance, you are always estimating underreporting factors.
For active surveillance, no estimates are required. You see the real data. The only thing you don’t get is death data because dead people don’t answer their phone.
In this case, 2,068 people provided answers. Could it be biased? Yup. The results at worst could be over stated by a factor of two. And even with that fudge factor it doesn’t matter because the rates are off the charts.
To get the translated report, just go to this article and click the Read Now button and it will download the PDF. It’s a quick read.
For the info behind the study, read this excellent article by Josh Guetzkow.
Highlights of the Israeli report
- 0.3% of people reported hospitalization as a result of the adverse event they experienced.
- 4.5% of respondents reported neurological problems
- Nearly 10% of women under age of 54 had disruptions to their menstrual cycle
- About 25% of people with pre-existing auto-immune disorders, depression or anxiety reported a worsening of their symptoms following the booster.
I have a great first-hand data point on neuro issues. I know a neurologist group with 20,000 patients. About 1,000 have new or worsened neurological issues after vaccination. So this is a 5% rate vs. the 4.5% in the study.
So that’s a quick sanity check.
Ivermectin is the better treatment option
We have a better option. A recent paper on Ivermectin shows that Ivermectin was far more effective than the vaccine in preventing death. The effect was so strong that the vaccine was rounding error. I’ll be writing more about that tomorrow.
In general, early treatment protocols are the way to go. They always have been. But the CDC is never going to endorse them. Fareed and Tyson have treated 10,000 COVID cases with no deaths as long as the patients promptly showed up for treatment and took the drugs they were given. ZERO deaths. That’s why the CDC ignores it. The pandemic would be over.
Jamal Edwards is dead at 31
Have you noticed? There sure are a lot of young people dropping dead lately.
The causes of death are always murky. The vaccination status is never mentioned.
The autopsies are rarely done, and when they are done, they are typically not done by anyone who knows how to assess a vaccine death. We never hear from the embalmers either.
We just let people die and not ask any questions. Result: more people die and we simply do not want to know the cause of death.
Summary: The vaccines should be stopped now
The Israeli MOH study is just another nail in the coffin for the vaccine. It shows the vaccines are not safe and should be stopped immediately.
The Israeli MOH study confirms numerous other data points (doctor event reporting rates, VAERS, DMED, life insurance company data, telltale blood clots, huge vaccine victim Facebook groups, the Peter Schirmacher study, and a military doctor who is seeing a 1 in 100 rate of myocarditis post vaccine).