So that’s what the United Statians have been doing instead of taking care of their population. The US has been playing games with its citizenry.
Control, control, control.
Obey, conform, consume.
So that’s what the United Statians have been doing instead of taking care of their population. The US has been playing games with its citizenry.
Control, control, control.
Obey, conform, consume.
Following the vote in Oakland, 100 supporters rose from their chairs, clapping and cheering for the move, according to the San Francisco Chronicle.
Nicolle Greenheart, co-founder of Decriminalize Nature Oakland, said:
“I don’t have words, I could cry … I’m thrilled. I’m glad that our communities will now have access to the healing medicines and we can start working on healing our communities.”
Save the date and spread the word!!! June 4th, 2019! We will start gathering at 7pm to prepare for the final City Council vote to #DecriminalizeNature#Oakland! There is room for more than 2-300 people with overflow, let’s pack the house! pic.twitter.com/0Db4xARHFt
— Decriminalize Nature (@DecrimNature) May 31, 2019
In addition to demanding that police halt the policing of the drugs, the resolution also instructs state and federal lobbyists from Oakland to push a decriminalization agenda. The resolution further calls for the Alameda County district attorney’s officials to “cease prosecution of persons involved in the use of Entheogenic Plants or plant-based compounds” that are presently listed in Schedule I of the federal Controlled Substances Act.
The resolution was championed by Councilman Noel Gallo, who introduced it after meeting with Decriminalize Nature, supporters of the use of natural psychedelics for mental health and people’s wellbeing.
Gallo told the Chronicle that the move is a strong step toward legitimizing the medicinal use of the plants, explaining:
“My grandmother took care of us. She didn’t go to Walgreens to heal us spiritually and physically, she did it out of plants we use as Native Americans.”
The Oakland City Council listened to the testimonies of 30 people who emphatically laid out how psilocybin helped them deal with mental health disorders including depression, anxiety, addiction, and trauma, according to USA Today.
During public comment, one woman said:
“I wasn’t really living a life, I was so disconnected … it was hard for me to survive everyday. It has helped me reach deep inside my soul and helped cure damage that had been done to me.”
Another man who explained that he struggled with heroin addiction said:
“It was the most beautiful and life-changing thing that ever happened to me.”
The council president, Rebecca Kaplan, thanked supporters of the resolution for sharing their “deep and personal and profound” stories.
An amendment to the resolution clarifies that it does not authorize the commercial sale or manufacture of the plants, possession or distribution in schools, or driving while under the influence of the psychedelic drugs.
The amendment also explains that potential users of psychedelics who are in the throes of depression or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) should first consult with a doctor before taking a dose, adding that natural psychedelics should be used in small doses for inexperienced users and “don’t go solo.”
The move comes as a growing body of research has laid out the benefits of magic mushrooms. Recent studies have shown how a microdose of psilocybin—far from the level needed for a full-blown trip—actually increases the creativity and empathy of participants. Advocates note that psilocybin has shown great promise in psychotherapeutic settings, shattering the decades-old stereotype of magic mushrooms as some intoxicating and hallucination-inducing party drug that drives its users insane.
Speaking before last week’s public safety committee, Councilman Gallo explained:
“We want to be able to provide another medical service… to be able to help us at home and that is what this is all about … And it’s nothing new. It’s been happening for thousands of years in different countries, in different spiritual backgrounds.”
The passage of the resolution comes amid a wave of activism supporting policy changes that would decriminalize natural psychedelics, with similar efforts advancing in the state of Iowa along with efforts to place a psilocybin legalization measure on the ballot in Oregon.
Not just the U.S., but the rest of the Western World, alarmingly, over the last 15 years the consistently sharp increases in child mental disorders have now reached epidemic levels. 1 in 5 children have been diagnosed with a mental health problem. In turn, more children than ever before are on psychiatric drugs.
Could the rise in mental disorders be the result of the agendized push for increased psychiatric drugging that began in and around the 1990’s? As mentioned earlier, 1 in 5 children have now been diagnosed with a mental health problem:
ADHD (Attention Hyperactivity Disorder) is now well over 40%
For children aged between 10-14 years suicide rates have risen by 200%
Teenager depression – up at 37%…
Psychiatric drugs – breaking down the figures
The different age groups and corresponding figures making up the well over 8 million children on psychiatric drugs in the U.S.A alone can be summarized:
Under 6 year-olds – 1,146,530 (yes, that’s well over a million!) and breaking down this figure
Less than 1 year olds – 274,804
2-3 year olds – 370,778
4-5 year olds – 500,948
6-12 Year olds – 4,130,340
At 6 years old the psychiatric drugging increases greatly because school starts. If a child is constantly disrupting a class of say 20 to 30-odd other children then drugging is seen as the easiest way to ‘neutralize’ or sedate the disruptive child…
13-17 Year olds – 3,617,593
-Do the adding up and that comes to a staggering 8,894,463. For more information on these figures go here and here.
Parents not informed about the well-documented serious risk
Of course, parenting can be difficult at times. In this era, parents face new complex challenges such as, for example, how to make the right choices for their children’s mental health. Parents are up against Big Pharma’s highly deceptive psychiatric criminal drug cartel that cares more about profits than people in the ‘PharMonopoly. ‘
It begins with the parents who are informed of their child’s “mental disorder.” The parents are then told that their child needs “medicating” without being given the full facts. They’re not told about the dangers of prescribing their child psychiatric meds that could cause serious side-effects, based on a mental disorder than has no science: No confirming medical tests to support a “diagnosis” based only on a subjective opinion from the child’s behavioural checklist. For example, consider the flaws in the case of giving a one year-old antidepressants.
How far will this agendized reckless endangerment go? It pays no heed to the pressing issue of informed consent. In the name of freedom, the right to refuse meds needs to be preserved before every single child ends up medicated.
It’s no great secret either that psychiatric drugs don’t cure. Psychiatrists and suchlike have openly admitted this. However, if parents refuse to get their child medicated on a potentially life-destroying psychiatric drug then they could find themselves charged with “gross medical neglect” by the CPS (Child Protective Service).
What about those non-invasive, non-toxic alternative therapies?? –No money to be made on those for Big Pharma, so these options are neglected. Stand alone drug treatment should only be a last resort. A holistic approach should be used (more on this later).
Children or adults, every day, millions are affected by mood-altering meds. Some reach their breaking point, culminating in horrific violent outbursts on others, or as suicides (or attempted suicides).
Whether it’s Columbine, Parkland, or other schools, after a pupil goes on a headline-making, school-shooting, killing rampage, there’s one thing that always ends up as “speculation” when people ask why it happened. Be it, for examples, from mainstream media or with politicians when debating gun laws, rumours abound, that “speculation” is the suggestion that the school shooting violence was brought on by the affects of psychiatric meds.
But it’s not speculation.
The link between the violence and psychiatric meds is a well-documented fact. Be it with school shootings or adults, many of these infamous mass-killers had either been on or were coming off psychiatric meds.
As long as the paid-off politicians turn a proverbial blind eye to this obvious link while allowing the Big Pharma psychiatric industry a highly lucrative cosy pathway that leads to the drug sales then we are an endangered race.
As famous psychiatrist Peter Breggin tells us in so many words, the equation is quite simple: more psychiatric meds = more mass shootings.
Firstly, parents need to connect the dots; educate themselves on how to make informed choices for the mental health and well-being of their children.
As mentioned earlier, stand alone,”band-aid” toxic drug treatment capable of assaulting the mind, body and spirit should only be a last resort. A holistic approach incorporating an IEP (Individualized Education Programme), family therapy and nutrition can be used…
The following advice is not only for children but also for adults. Bear this in mind when 1 in 6 adults are on psychiatric meds. Here are 6 things for optimal health and well-being.
1. Diet
The importance of a good diet cannot be overstated. A healthy diet greatly promotes good mood, ability to concentrate and has even been shown to reduce violent behaviour. Avoiding junk food such as refined sugar products, a good diet consists of natural wholesome organic seeds, nuts, fruits and vegetables…etc. Make sure of a good supply of quality fats.
2. Drink plenty of water
Many suffering from mental health problems are known to be seriously dehydrated. For example, schizophrenics have this disposition. The human body is around 75% water. So, it goes without saying that drinking good water promotes health and well-being. The brain has the highest water content…
3. Maintain good gut health
Gut microbiome greatly influences mood and behaviour. Fermented foods, probiotics and B-vitamins promote beneficial gut microbiome. A healthy gut produces good levels of the feel-good chemical serotonin.
4. Get lots of sunlight
Those suffering from depression are known to have low vitamin D levels. Increased sunlight exposure raises body vitamin D levels and thus effectively treats depression. How about getting sunlight by spending time in nature?
5. Handle stress levels
Out-of-balance stress and mental health problems are inextricably linked. Therefore to return to balance it’s necessary to handle stress levels.
Meditation and yoga are excellent ways to handle stress. They have shown to be good for treating metal problems such as depression.
6. Reduce EMF exposure
Overexposure to EMF/RF wireless applications have been known to cause nervous, hormonal and behavioural problem, so try to minimize this. Especially with children as they are more susceptible.
Finally
Consult a health professional at all times for guided advice.
Paul A. Philips is the author of NewParadigm.ws.
To state it plainly: Psychiatric drugs represent big money for Big Pharma, and when you consider that this is the same industry that has broken all the rules to keep pushing killer opioids on vulnerable patients, you certainly can’t trust that they will take the moral high ground when it comes to those afflicted with mental health problems.
If it were just a case of exploiting vulnerable people with high-cost drugs that would be bad enough. However, the problem is so much worse than that because these drugs are not only ineffective, but downright dangerous. They carry serious side effects, including mania, violence, psychosis and homicidal ideation (the desire to commit murder), and have been linked to dozens of mass shootings, including at least 36 school shootings in which the killer was found to have been on or withdrawing from some kind of psychiatric drug at the time of the killings.
Waking Times recently reported on an eight-year study by medical researcher Craig Wagner, which investigated the efficacy of and dangers associated with antidepressants, antipsychotic drugs and benzodiazepines. His findings are both shocking and enlightening.
Wagner explained that while antipsychotics do reduce psychosis for some people, for many others they offer no relief, but many life-altering side effects:
[L]ess than a quarter of those with chronic psychosis see even a 50% reduction in symptoms when using them.4 And this partial symptom relief often comes with life-altering side effects. Additionally, evidence suggests that antipsychotics may do more harm than good in the long term.
These drugs literally shrink the brain, causing atrophy. Close to half (48 percent) of those who take them do not respond well initially, while 77 percent of chronic patients who take them long-term do not respond well. Upwards of 93 percent of people relapse, obtain no benefit or stop taking antipsychotics within a year, while 60 percent experience ongoing functional impairment, and 53 percent have to deal with sexual dysfunction. Antipsychotics also treble their users’ risk of diabetes and double the risk of cardiac death in elderly patients. Long-term patients are up to three times less likely to hold down a job, and up to four times less likely to recover from their mental illness. (Related: Young women have the highest risk of mental health issues.)
Wagner noted that meta-analyses and the Food and Drug Administration’s own studies have proved that antidepressants have virtually no benefit in comparison to placebo:
To gain this small advantage people must accept antidepressants’ side effects, risks, and limitations which can be significant. Even more startling, at milder symptom levels — representing about 85% of people taking these drugs for depression — antidepressants have no advantage over placebo.
Virtually half of all antidepressant studies (49 percent) failed to prove that these drugs offer any benefit, and it is believed that 82 percent of the beneficial effects experienced by users are pure placebo effect. At least 60 percent of those who take antidepressants feel emotionally numb, with 54 percent of their symptoms remaining after they start taking the drugs, and 62 percent experiencing sexual dysfunction. For those who try to get off these drugs, 55 percent experiencing debilitating withdrawal effects. Children and young adults under the age of 25 double their risk of suicide if they take antidepressants, and patients of any age who take them increase their risk of developing mania between two and four times.
While these drugs quickly and effectively reduce anxiety symptoms, they are highly addictive and carry dangerous side effects. While guidelines recommend prescribing them for no more than 28 days, in practice some patients have been on them for years. And this is not surprising, since dependence occurs within days or just a few weeks. Benzo users double their risk of suicide and increase their risk of a hip fracture by a staggering 80 percent after more than one month’s use. Those who take these drugs for more than six months increase their risk of Alzheimer’s by 84 percent, and can expect a 3.5 times greater risk of cognitive decline and loss in 12 functional areas.
Sadly, all of the conditions above respond well to cognitive behavioral and other psychological therapies, but these are hardly ever prescribed or recommended. (Related: Gardening and volunteering boosts mental health, relieving stress, anxiety and depression.)
After all, nobody’s making money off a patient who gets better, are they?
Read Psychiatry.news for more coverage of psychiatric drugs.
Sources include:
The psychiatric/pharmaceutical drug industry is worth a staggering $80 billion a year in sales alone, and Washington is literally crawling with lobbyists who have seemingly bottomless pots of cash to smooth the regulatory path for drug manufacturers. This has led to a situation in which the politicians tasked with protecting some of the most vulnerable people in the nation – those with mental health issues – have adopted a “see no evil, hear no evil approach.” They happily look the other way as doctors and psychiatrists continue to prescribe antidepressant and anti-anxiety drugs despite their dangerous side effects, which include mania, violence, psychosis and homicidal ideation (the desire to commit murder).
While many politicians focus on the gun debate when discussing the issue of mass shootings, what virtually none of them ever mention is the clearly established link between such mass homicides and psychiatric drugs. The mental health watchdog organization, CCHR International, recently reported that at least 36 school shootings or other school-related acts of violence were committed by people who were either on psychiatric drugs or withdrawing from them – which can be just as dangerous.
These acts of violence resulted in the deaths of 80 people and the wounding of a further 172. In addition, there have been many similar incidents where information regarding the mental health and psychiatric drug use of the killer/s was not made public, so the problem is likely far worse. (Related: Every mass shooting over the last 20 years has one thing in common, and it isn’t guns.)
Peter Breggin, a world-famous psychiatrist who has been called “the conscience of his profession,” recently warned that the side effects of psychiatric drugs are an “obvious prescription for violence.”
Last month, Waking Times published an excerpt from a column Dr. Breggin wrote for Mad in America, entitled, “Psychiatrist Says: More Psychiatry Means More Shootings:”
Not only do psychiatric drugs add to the risk of violence, but psychiatric treatment lulls the various authorities and the family into believing that the patient is now ‘under control’ and ‘less of a risk.’ Even the patient may think the drugs are helping, and continue to take them right up to the moment of violence.
Even when some of their patients signal with all their might that they are dangerous and need to be stopped, mental health providers are likely to give drugs, adding fuel to the heat of violent impulses, while assuming that their violence-inducing drugs will reduce the risk of serious aggression.
Business Insider reported that no less than 27 international drug regulatory agencies have issued warnings about the dangerous side effects of these drugs, and over 1,500 individual cases of “psychotropic drug-induced homicidal ideation” have been reported to the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s) MedWatch program.
The FDA admits that less than 10 percent of all the adverse effects of psychiatric drugs are actually reported to MedWatch. If one were to assume that five percent of all such effects are reported, a total of 30,600 instances of homicidal ideation/actual homicide could be linked directly to the use of psychiatric drugs.
One of the most shocking of all mass shooting incidents in which the shooter had a history of psychiatric drug use was the October 3, 2017 incident at the Las Vegas music festival, where shooter Stephen Paddock killed 59 people and wounded a further 500. It has subsequently emerged that the 64-year-old Paddock had been prescribed the dangerous mind-altering sedative-hypnotic drug, diazepam, which several studies have confirmed can cause “violence, aggression, homicidal ideation and suicide risk or attempts.”
Perhaps Jon Rappoport, writing for Waking Times, said it best when he noted:
The public is in the middle of a psychiatric plague. Learning the truth is the first step forward.
After that, we MUST preserve the right to refuse medication.
Freedom and life itself hang in the balance.
Read Psychiatry.news for more coverage of the mass psychiatric drugging of children.
Sources include:
Chemical-dosing experiment to force friendship toward migrants: not science fiction
I really hope you understand this.
It is not a fantasy. It isn’t science fiction. It isn’t satire.
It is Brave New World, but not the Huxley novel. It’s happening now.
It’s a published study that appears on the website of the prestigious Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
The title of the study is, “Oxytocin-enforced norm compliance reduces xenophobic outgroup rejection.” (Reference: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Aug 29;114(35):9314-9319.)
Xenophobia is defined as: “fear or hatred of foreigners, people from different cultures, or strangers.” (Dictionary.com)
Oxytocin, the chemical used in this study, is described by Medical News Today: “Widely referred to as the love hormone, oxytocin has also been dubbed the hug hormone, cuddle chemical, moral molecule, and the bliss hormone due to its effects on behavior, including its role in love and in female reproductive biological functions in reproduction.”
“Oxytocin is a hormone that is made in the brain, in the hypothalamus. It is transported to, and secreted by, the pituitary gland, which is located at the base of the brain.”
The published study details a successful attempt at chemical mind control. The goal is making people more “happy and friendly” about mass migration, by changing their hormonal response toward migrants.
Nothing in the study cites inherent migration problems, such as increased violent crime, back-breaking financial pressure on government budgets, and the eroding of local cultures. It’s all about shifting feeling and reaction toward waves of immigrants.
Here are extensive quotes from the new study:
“Here we report the results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled experiment showing that enhanced activity of the oxytocin system paired with charitable social cues [programming] can help counter the effects of xenophobia by fostering altruism toward refugees. These findings suggest that the combination of oxytocin and peer-derived altruistic norms [social cues] reduces outgroup rejection [toward migrants] even in the most selfish and xenophobic individuals, and thereby would be expected to increase the ease by which people adapt to rapidly changing social ecosystems [mass immigration].”
“…we tested the propensity of 183 Caucasian participants to make donations to people in need, half of whom were refugees (outgroup) and half of whom were natives (ingroup). Participants scoring low on xenophobic attitudes [showing they already accept mass immigration] exhibited an altruistic preference for the outgroup, which further increased after nasal delivery of the neuropeptide oxytocin. In contrast, participants with higher levels of xenophobia generally failed to exhibit enhanced altruism toward the outgroup. This tendency was only countered by pairing oxytocin with peer-derived altruistic norms [social-programming cues], resulting in a 74% increase in refugee-directed donations. Collectively, these findings reveal the underlying sociobiological conditions associated with outgroup-directed altruism by showing that charitable social cues co-occurring with enhanced activity of the oxytocin system reduce the effects of xenophobia by facilitating prosocial behavior toward refugees.”
The truly disturbing and mind-boggling aspect of this study is: many people would accept it as a reasonable way to “solve” the migrant crisis.
Forget about the actual effects of immigration. They’re irrelevant. Instead, focus on re-shaping people’s minds, through chemical intervention combined with social programming.
The authors of the mind-control study are basically saying, “If you have a problem with mass immigration, the problem has nothing to do with facts. It only has to do with your hormone system. Basically, you have a deficit of oxytocin.”
I have written many articles about the effects of philosophic materialism, including its conclusion that humans are merely biological machines and, therefore, can be manipulated at will by “those in charge.”
Free will? A delusion. Individual choice? Unacceptable. Humans are inherently programmed in every respect, and badly programmed at that. The central flaws must be fixed. Humans must be reconfigured so they automatically respond to stimuli in new ways. ‘More humane ways.’
Lost in this study, as well, are the effects of dosing with oxytocin on a person’s overall hormone system. You don’t suddenly ramp up one hormone without changing levels of others—testosterone, for example. But who cares, when the social and political goal must be attained? If men become more passive in the process, why not?
Perhaps that notion will be the formation of the next study. “Let’s cut testosterone and see what happens. How much of it do we need to reduce before men just lie around and play with toys and dolls?”
Interestingly enough, the authors of the study never considered dosing male immigrants of military age with the oxytocin “love hormone.” Heaven forbid. That would be “interfering in their culture.”
That’s called a clue.
In Brave New World, Huxley included every kind of programming he could imagine: genetically controlled, synthetic, motherless, incubator pregnancy and birth, during which extensive mind control was applied; consequent separation of classes of humans, relative to their assigned work and social relations; elimination of the traditional family; erasure of all hostile impulses; societal norms constructed to encourage physical pleasure as the highest ideal; and a “miracle drug,” Soma, ready at hand to dispel the depression and doubt that might somehow creep through and survive the massive programming. The “inevitable outcome?” EVERYONE WILL BE HAPPY.
In one stage or another, all these strategies are now being pushed forward toward a Technocratic future.
With Utopian justice for all.
Again, the proposition on which this lunacy is based is: freedom does not exist. It was always an illusion. Humans have never been anything more than programmed bio-machines. Therefore, ANY level and degree of re-programming is justified.
Objections to this crusade are merely part of the illusion that freedom is real.
However, freedom IS real. How individuals view it and what they do with it is an entirely different matter. If they see it as nothing more than choosing between a vacation in Disney World and Las Vegas, choosing between reruns of CSI and Matlock, then Brave New World will seem like a minor change.
Conceiving, realizing, and experiencing freedom as a vast space and a vast platform for individual action—creative action, meaningful action—THAT is a prerequisite for the survival of life as we know it.
The life we hold dear.
Who defines “meaningful action?”
You do.
Jon Rappoport
The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.
I used to wonder how a human being could abandon his/her humanity and commit atrocious and brutal acts of violence. Then it was revealed that most ISIS/ Daes actors were under the influence of Captagon. (More on Captagon).This is a nothing new as the entire German nation was on similar stimulants that could explain the barbarity of Germans during WW2. War is not natural. You need to pump the appropriate chemicals to change a decent human into a frenzied and violent human.
During Syrian conflict, 50 percent of the world’s amphetamine seizures happened in the Arabian Peninsula, it is known that Daesh terrorists are addicted to the ‘chemical courage.’
A Jordan Army official said that the eastern military command, in coordination with the Anti-Narcotics Department (AND) and the Military Security Department foiled an attempt to smuggle a huge amount of Captagon drugs into the Kingdom, according to local media citing a source in the Armed Forces.
The military source stated that they have to apply rules of engagement after the border guards spotted a car that attempted to enter the country, which led it to retreat to Syria.
After searching the area, a number of bags containing 497,705 Captagon pills were seized and transported to the authorities, the source of the Armed Forces said.
Captagon is a psychostimulant which is made of a combination of amphetamine and theophylline in order to bolster physical strength. In the 1950s, when it was created, it was used for treating depression, attention deficit disorder, and narcolepsy. It was banned in Western countries in the 1980s when scientist found out that it was highly addictive.
Amphetamines raise energy, allowing users to stay awake for longer times and increasing the belief that one has a greater pain threshold.
Since 2008, 50 percent of the world’s amphetamine seizures happened in the Arabian Peninsula-and Daesh* may be linked to that business, like the Taliban has done with opium, to drive income. Syria and Lebanon were the top countries for amphetamine seizures in 2016, the trade was partly fueled by the Syrian conflict.
It was found out the terrorist have taken the amphetamine-filled Captagon immediately before many assaults that took place in Syria.
*Daesh (ISIS, IS, Islamic State) is terrorist organization banned in Russia.
freedom-articles.toolsforfreedom.com
Makia Freeman
March 5, 2018
False flag mass shootings occur with regularity, so they must be working to meet the aims of the NWO orchestrators. True solutions will only come once we pass through the stages of awakening.
continue to be a favored strategy used by the New World Order (NWO) controllers to further their agenda of fear and domination. It seems that every time a gap of time opens up since the last one, the US public is again hit with another incident. This shows that these events must be working to achieve the intended objectives of their orchestrators. For those who wonder when false flag mass shootings will become an ineffective social engineering tool, the answer is simple: only once enough people awaken to the deception, bring consciousness to their reactions to these events, and intentionally respond in new ways. Having said that, there are various stages of awakening to pass through regarding these events. It is only from a broader perspective that we can truly hope to stop the effectiveness of these events, designed to play with and exploit the emotions of the average person.
The first stage is the knee-jerk reaction: “Something has to be done! Let’s get rid of all the guns!” However well-meaning these sentiments are, they lack the basic recognition that guns in and of themselves are a tool, which can be used constructively or destructively. Yes, guns are designed to shoot bullets to injure or kill, but nonetheless, they can be used as a deterrent or for other defensive purposes. For those who hunt, or simply defend their livestock from other predatory animals, guns serve a constructive purpose. To focus on the tool or instrument, rather than the intent and mindset of the person that uses them, is only approaching the issue from a very shallow perspective.
I am not a typical gun rights advocate; I don’t like guns. I recently read a bumper sticker that stated “If guns cause crime, pencils cause misspellings.” It’s humorous, yet at the same time, it’s undeniable that guns are a tool of violence. I understand that violence begets more violence. By owning and carrying a gun, you may be attracting or drawing in situations where gun use will be likely or required. However, I am a firm believer gun rights, the 2nd Amendment and the decentralization of power in all its aspects. I trust that the overwhelming majority of gun owners are sensible, moral people who exercise extreme care in handling a gun, which is more than we can say for the US Government, whose agents are trained to kill foreigners (US military) or to kill its own citizens (trigger-happy US cops). US police killings account for far more annual American deaths than false flag mass shootings.
Here are 7 reasons that gun control is short-sighted, reactionary and fails to achieve the objectives that people want:
– gun control doesn’t guarantee that criminals won’t get guns. Criminals will break the law and find a way to acquire them illegally. It only limits gun ownership by law-abiding citizens;
– gun control punishes the respectful, decent majority of gun owners for the alleged actions of a tiny few crazies;
– gun control centralizes power. It puts exclusive rights of gun ownership in the hands of the government, which people already know to be extremely untrustworthy. Why is the corrupt, deceitful and violent government somehow more likely to protect you, or do you less harm, than your average fellow citizen?
– it plays into the broader scheme of citizen disarmament which was carried out by past tyrants (Hitler, Stalin, Mao). History shows that this mostly served to solidify their power, thus making people in those nations less safe;
– gun control emboldens burglars and other criminals, who knowing that guns will be illegal and obtaining some for themselves anyway, can carry out more attacks, since their victims are less able to defend themselves;
– it abandons a right that our forefathers had the wisdom to instate in the Bill of Rights. The real reason for the 2nd Amendment was not to protect those who wanted guns for hunting, but rather as a last recourse for citizens to overthrow an out-of-control government that no longer served them; and
– gun control is a key plank of the overarching NWO agenda known as Agenda 21 or Agenda 2030. The idea is force people into human habitats like smart cities where they will be monitored 24/7, dependent on government for everything and without the rights they currently have today.
The next stage of awakening around false flag mass shootings is to look more closely at the mindset of the alleged shooter. More and more people are starting to recognize the obvious connection between pharmaceuticals – often psychiatric and psychotropic drugs – and mass shootings. These drugs are designed to numb you out, detach you from reality and kill your ability to feel emotion – including empathy. With empathy gone, it’s anything goes.
There is much evidence of the psych drug-mass shooter connection. I wrote the following in a 2013 article Psychiatric Drugs and Mass Shootings: The Definitive Connection:
“The link between violence (especially gun murder) and pharmaceutical drugs has been well established. [The former website www.ssristories.com] contain [ed] a long list of documented instances where hundreds of people have been wounded or killed by gunshot at the hands of someone who was under the influence of SSRI antidepressant psychiatric medication – Prozac, Celexa, Paxil and Zoloft being the most common. The list (which is not exhaustive) shows that psychiatric drugs are not only connected to gun violence – they have also been implicated in numerous instances of knife attacks, bomb threats, bizarre behavior, assault and hitting victims with a car. According to CCHR, between 2004 and 2011, there have been more than 11,000 reports placed via the U.S. FDA’s MedWatch system of psychiatric drug side effects related to violence, including 300 cases of homicide, close to 3,000 cases of mania and more than 7,000 cases of aggression. There is evidence that psychiatric drugs were involved in the all of the mass shootings at Columbine (1999), Virginia (2007), Aurora (2012) and Sandy Hook (2012).”
Jon Rappoport quotes psychiatrist and author Dr. Peter Breggin:
“With Luvox there is some evidence of a four-percent rate for mania in adolescents. Mania, for certain individuals, could be a component in grandiose plans to destroy large numbers of other people. Mania can go over the hill to psychosis.”
“In his book, Toxic Psychiatry, Dr. Breggin discusses the subject of drug combinations: “Combining antidepressants [e.g., Prozac, Luvox, Paxil] and psychostimulants [e.g., Ritalin] increases the risk of cardiovascular catastrophe, seizures, sedation, euphoria, and psychosis. Withdrawal from the combination can cause a severe reaction that includes confusion, emotional instability, agitation, and aggression.” Children are frequently medicated with this combination, and when we highlight such effects as aggression, psychosis, and emotional instability, it is obvious that the result is pointing toward the very real possibility of violence.”
In true problem-reaction-solution style, some are now advocating more authority for mental health agencies.
Moving beyond blaming just the weapon, or even just the shooter, some people now believe that the deepest cause for these false flag mass shootings is the culture of violence. We are inundated with violence, especially in the form of Hollywood movies and video games which are now becoming so realistic it is easy for the brain to confuse the two. We are the imagination of ourselves; we become what stories we tell to ourselves and our children. As long as our hall of heroes is full of men (and women) shooting others with guns, we will worship and emulate these “heroes.”
This culture of violence creates a mindset of “might is right”, “force is justified” and “peace through strength.” This last phrase was adopted by the US government/military (e.g. Ronald Reagan) but is very old. It was even used by leaders such as the Roman Emperor Hadrian in the first century AD. The idea is that you have to be strong, tough, macho and aggressive to deter anyone else from attacking you, and that this translates into peace. This is another shallow idea which fails to understand that genuine peace can only be created through a win/win scenario, not through a situation where others harbor feelings of fear, resentment and hate towards you, for that is powder keg waiting to blow.
This culture of violence also affects people’s mental health on an individual level, which is exacerbated by psych drugs as pointed out in #2 above. This leads on to the next stage of awakening around false flag mass shootings: mind control.
Mind control is a massive topic which has a very direct relevance to false flag mass shootings, because so many of these patsy shooters show evidence of being mentally influenced and tampered with. Mind controlled assassins can be traced way back to the Cult of the Assassins in the Middle East during the Middle Ages. In more recent history, the CIA, using Nazi research and scientists under Project Paperclip, developed MK Ultra starting in 1953, which was so large it had 149 sub-projects. The fruits of this operation begun to pay off in the 1960s, when the CIA used their mind control techniques to cultivate assassins such as those used in the murders of JFK, RFK, MLK and John Lennon.
These days the techniques have no doubt been perfected. James Holmes, the alleged gunman of the 2012 Aurora Colorado shootings, looked incredibly drugged up and mind controlled during his time in court. There are also links among James Holmes’ family, DARPA and mind control. Aaron Alexis, the Washington Navy Yard shooter of 2013, said a statement that “he heard voices in his head” which may well be a reference to the electronic and psychotronic weaponry deployed by the Intelligence Agencies to mind control the shooters. Alexis reported that “individuals were speaking to him through the floor and ceiling and using “some sort of microwave machine” to send vibrations through the ceiling, “penetrating his body so he could not fall asleep.”“
When you understand the scale on which these events operate, a knee-jerk reaction of advocating gun control seems absurd. The evidence shows that the government is literally mind controlling people to commit heinous acts without being fully conscious of it! Why are we wasting our energy and attention on the type of weapon used when this type and scale of evil is being perpetrated?
However, this is not the end of the story. Next, we need to look at unpeel another layer of the deception of false flag mass shootings.
At this stage of awakening, you begin to see that there is a large force directing events, which renders the whole gun control debate in a completely new light.
The official narratives of these mass shootings never add up. They are full of more holes than the proverbial Swiss cheese. As I covered in the article The False Flag Formula – 15 Ways to Detect a False Flag Operation, false flag mass shootings contain many elements that prove the events are orchestrated in advance by the government, such as drills at the same place at the same (or nearby) time, foreknowledge, conflicting eyewitness accounts, witnesses reporting multiple shooters when the official story is only 1 shooter, the rapid way in which the MSM names the alleged shooter or patsy, the supposed shot and kill rate of the patsy (who is often young, weak or overweight with no military training), the destruction of evidence and so on.
False flag mass shootings need to be seen in the context of false flag operations in general, which have been the instigators of countless wars, such as the 1898 Spanish-American War, World War 1, World War 2 (Pearl Harbor), the Vietnam War (Gulf of Tonkin), 9/11 and more. It’s always the same trick; someone wants war but doesn’t want to be seen as the aggressor, so they make it look they are being attacked and thus only acting in self-defense.
I could go on for a very long time but here is the point: the government is carrying out these operations. Why are we so focused on supposedly protecting our safety by advocating giving more control and weaponry to the very same government, which then has the effect of disempowers us further, thus doing the exact opposite of what we want?
There are steps beyond just seeing mass shootings as false flags. We live a world of such immense fakery – Everything is Fake! – that we have to question everything, because unfortunately our eyes and senses are easy to deceive. This is only going to become even worse as technology develops. Face fakery/invention is easy; video fakery is easy; holograms are now so good that it’s hard to tell the difference between them and reality.
Sandy Hook was a watershed event in the history of mass shootings, because for the first time, awakened individuals had to ask whether there were actually real victims, i.e. in other words, whether it was a false flag (with real victims) or a false flag hoax (with no real victims). Fake blood, fake injuries and smiling & laughing crisis actors show that these events are at least partially (and perhaps fully) staged.
From the perspective of the controllers, having an entirely staged event with no real victims is “cleaner”, because you can control everything down to the last detail (exactly who gets shot, who “dies”, etc.) without worrying about a situation getting out of hand or possible lawsuits in the future. If there are no real victims or real dead kids, there are no parents to sue the government, right?
The NWO manipulators who orchestrate these events are very cunning. They have deliberately targeted schools as the object of many false flag mass shootings, so as to inspire the maximum amount of fear and chaos, which is their life force energy. Another benefit for them is that anyone who suggests these events are not merely false flags, but actually false flag hoaxes, is immediately ridiculed and/or censored in many ways, including being viciously attacked for being insensitive to the “dead” kids. This adds to the atmosphere of self-censorship where there are certain “no go” zones for researchers (and ultimately “no think”) zones which is the exact goal, of course, of political correctness.
False flag mass shootings are all about fear, chaos and control. They are designed to usher in the New World Order. They induce an enormous amount of fear in people who worry that they or their children could be struck at any time; they create huge emotional upheaval and chaos to rip people out of their grounded, rational or sensible way of seeing the world to create a skewed perspective; and they aim to deceive people into giving up control.
False flag mass shootings will continue to be rolled out against a bamboozled and unsuspecting public as long as the deception remains profitable and effective in achieving its intended goals. However, as more and more people awaken to the game and begin to see the bigger picture, these events will become less effective. I see signs that people are beginning to question more, e.g. with the February 14th, 2018 Florida high school shooting earlier this year, people were asking questions about the psych drug-shooter connection in the immediate aftermath. Hopefully the awakening will quickly continue to the next stages en masse.
*****
Makia Freeman is the editor of alternative media / independent news site The Freedom Articles and senior researcher at ToolsForFreedom.com, writing on many aspects of truth and freedom, from exposing aspects of the worldwide conspiracy to suggesting solutions for how humanity can create a new system of peace and abundance.
Sources:
*http://freedom-articles.toolsforfreedom.com/psychiatric-drugs-mass-shootings-definitive-connection/
*http://www.cchrint.org/school-shooters/
*https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2018/02/22/mass-shootings-and-psychiatric-drugs-the-connection/
*http://freedom-articles.toolsforfreedom.com/20-declassified-files-gov-crime-p1/
*https://www.sott.net/article/248803-Wayne-Madsen-James-Holmes-Family-Tied-To-DARPA-And-Mind-Manipulation-Work
*http://www.newportthisweek.com/pageview/view/1001
*http://freedom-articles.toolsforfreedom.com/false-flag-formula-15-ways-to-detect/
*http://freedom-articles.toolsforfreedom.com/everything-is-fake-top-40-part-1/
*http://freedom-articles.toolsforfreedom.com/video-photo-evidence-faked-fabricated/
*http://freedom-articles.toolsforfreedom.com/sandy-hook-3rd-anniversary-hoodwinked/
*http://freedom-articles.toolsforfreedom.com/false-flags-funny-laughing-crisis-actors/
*http://freedom-articles.toolsforfreedom.com/political-correctness-language-thought-control/
A small, experimental study from researchers at Imperial College-London suggests that in addition to helping treat depression, psychedelic mushrooms may actually reduce politically authoritarian leanings.
Dr. Robin Carhart-Harris, Head of Psychedelic Research at the Centre for Neuropsychopharmacology, Division of Brain Sciences, led a small investigation into the effects of mushrooms on seven individuals with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). The results, titled “Increased nature relatedness and decreased authoritarian political views after psilocybin for treatment-resistant depression,” were published last week in the Journal of Psychopharmacology.
Citing previous research showing psychedelic use can alter personality traits, attitudes, and beliefs, Carhart-Harris and Ph.D. student Taylor Lyons set out to examine changes in attitudes toward nature and politics. According to their summary, they “compared the effects of psilocybin on nature relatedness and libertarian–authoritarian political perspective in patients with TRD versus healthy control subjects.” Patients who received psilocybin treatment each had two doses a week apart.
The participants’ views were all evaluated “at baseline and then again at the 1 week and 7-12-months follow-ups” using a Libertarian-Authoritarian political survey, as well as a nature-relatedness survey.
The study authors found that with regard to nature-relatedness, their “results suggest that psilocybin therapy increases the subjective sense of connectedness to nature 1 week after treatment, and that these effects are sustained for at least 7–12 months.”
“Before I enjoyed nature, now I feel part of it. Before I was looking at it as a thing, like TV or a painting… [But now I see] there’s no separation or distinction, you are it,” said one participant.
They also found that one week after treatment, dosed subjects with TRD “had depressive symptoms were significantly reduced to levels more comparable with controls.”
Further, “Patients showed a significant decrease in authoritarian political perspective 1 week after psilocybin treatment,” the authors summarized, noting that “results suggest that psilocybin therapy may persistently decrease authoritarian attitudes post-treatment with psilocybin.” They cautioned against drawing any definitive conclusions and advised that “further research is required to test the robustness of this relationship.”
Carhart and Lyons advocated more investigation for reasons including the small sample size of their study, the potential of other factors besides psilocybin to influence the results, and gender disparities between the TRD and control groups (there were more men in the TRD group and more women in the control group).
Nevertheless, they pointed to the historical relationship between psychedelic use and breaking away from authoritarian beliefs, also citing the relevance of their most recent study:
“Psychedelic drug use in the 1960s and 1970s was strongly associated with anti-establishment and egalitarian counter-culture movements (Nichols, 2016), yet very little controlled research has investigated the link between psychedelic use and political perspectives. Here we show for the first time, in a controlled study, lasting changes in political values after exposure to a psychedelic drug. This is in line with early research showing that recreational LSD users score higher on attitudes of ‘personal liberty’ and ‘foreign policy liberalism’ than control subjects.”
Source: What is Cloud 9 (The Zombie Drug of Brazil)? – disinformation
With permission from
disinfo.com
Oct 9, 2017
This is your brain on zombie drugs
You may have seen this VIDEO haunting social media of a Brazilian woman convulsing, dead-eyed and contorting all Walking Dead like – or the Brazilian going all “28 Days Later” versus a public bus – well, it’s not because “zombies are so in right now” as hollywood execs would have you believe, no, these wrangled psyches and dead-eyed possessions are that of a synthetic drug called “Cloud Nine” or “Cloud 9.”
These are reminiscent of the infamous 2012 “Florida Cannibal” or “bath-salt zombie” that flooded the news when “Rudy Eugene – who is believed to have taken the over-the-counter ecstasy-like drug – growled at officers as he chewed off most of a homeless man’s face before being shot dead by Miami police.” Reportedly he was on a similar synthetic drug known as “Flakka.”
Humor of an oncoming zombie apocalypse aside – it seems that the recent scourge of overdose-related-psychosis across Brazil are due these synthetic drugs, commonly known as “bath salts,” and they’re back with a ravenous vengeance. Lets take this time to reintroduce these easily obtained poisons, as there is something far more menacing lurking behind the undead…
What exactly are “bath salts” and more specifically, “Cloud 9”?
Both Flakka and Cloud 9 are commonly referred to an umbrella term for synthetic drugs colloquially known as “bath salts” because of their resemblance to epsom salt and because distributors are able to sell them under the guise of “bath-salts.” Because of the Florida 2012 incident, however, the government got hip to “bath salts” being synonymous with synthetic drugs, so now they’re commonly sold as “incense” from producers like China without much of any regulation and continue to do so. I have no idea what incense are like crystalline powder, nor how one burns incense in one of these but I digress.
The desired effects from Flakka and Cloud 9 are quite similar, as well. The Florida zombie incident was said to have been caused by “Flakka” specifically – “the pharmaceutical name for the designer drug is a-Pyrrolidinopentiophenone – otherwise known as a-PVP or alpha-PVP” according to the infamous Rolling Stone article about Rudy’s big-day-out. Users often desiring meth-like symptoms have reported it to be similar to that of amphetamine, and conversely, the undesired symptoms such as severe anxiety hyper fight-or-flight brain functioning is often reported at higher doses. Oh yeah, and it is still ridiculously easy to purchase online.
Cloud 9, though similar in affect both positively and negatively to Flakka, is not of the same chemical compound (a common tactic used by synthetic drug makers to evade regulation.) Because Cloud 9 has been cited as the distinct culprit of these recent Brazil zombie epidemic, Florida company Waters Edge Recovery, issued out warnings to would be users explaining that Cloud 9 resembles epsom salt, too… but unlike Flakka’s a-PVP, “chemical tests have revealed that it contains the substance methylenedioxypyrovalerone (MDPV), although it’s not listed on the ingredients.”
It’s important to note, however, that various different compounds and brands use the name ‘Cloud Nine or Cloud 9’, as all have assuredly said the MPDV compoud. I highly doubt the CBD hemp oil is the “Cloud 9” they’re speaking of… but who knows, ingredients are rarely listed and if they are, narcotic ones are almost always omitted.
“Methylenedioxypyrovalerone (MDPV),” according to Wikipedia, “is the 3,4-methylenedioxy ring–substituted analog of the compound pyrovalerone, developed in the 1960s, which has been used for the treatment of chronic fatigue and as an anorectic, but caused problems of abuse and dependence… it has been shown to produce robust reinforcing effects and compulsive self-administration in rats, though this had already been provisionally established by a number of documented cases of misuse and addiction in humans, before the animal tests had been carried out.”
As with a-PVP, “MDPV acts as a stimulant and has been reported to produce effects similar to those of cocaine, methylphenidate, and amphetamines.”
And the adverse effects?
“High doses have been observed to cause intense, prolonged panic attacks in stimulant-intolerant users, and there are anecdotal reports of psychosis from sleep withdrawal and addiction at higher doses or more frequent dosing intervals.”
Retailers like THIS and THIS still have the product listed, but further investigation shows that it is unavailable to purchase – I sense a repackaging/branding like that of this new BIZARRO INCENSE one company is adamant in promoting on the Cloud 9 product pages. But that’s the thing with these unregulated drugs, love them or hate them, as they can rename and re-label it as “incense” to evade regulation and public safety, they may also do so the exact compound if one is outlawed.
The same retailer claimed Cloud 9 “is a high quality herbal blend that gives the perfect synergy of mood and aroma. If your busy lifestyle has left you craving an escape, this incense will help you get away from it all without ever leaving the privacy of your living room.”
The term “herbal” obviously another buzz word for would-be millennial consumers…”it’s herbal so it’s okay!”
I’m not here to proselytize regulation or deregulation – but I will say this… remember those Johnny Depp anti-drug ads “This is your brain on drugs…” (especially the ‘Freddy’s Dead’ one)? Well, what could be more revealing of this harmful drug than an advert like this (even if the following video is fake):
I’m casing the local mall for refuge if you idiots keep buying this shit, is all I’m saying.
Know what the fuck you’re taking. These companies don’t give two shits about your sanity nor your vegetarianism.
Source: Can pills for depression turn you into a killer? – Darkmoon
With permission from
By Caroline Scott
(‘The Daily Mail’)
Abridged by Lasha Darkmoon
with additional notes and comments
Antidepressants can lead to brain damage, suicide and murder, yet they are being prescribed to 120 million people worldwide, including 1-year-old babies. Has the world gone mad?
David Carmichael, 59, calmly and methodically describes the events leading up to the day he killed his 11‑year-old son Ian. He maintains his composure right up to the point when he describes his boy: “Oh man, he was the most loving child.” His face clouds and he rocks with pain. “We spent so much time together and we got along great. He was a beautiful boy, a beautiful gift. I miss him so much.”
Ian had epilepsy and very mild dyslexia, but had no problems other than being a little behind with his reading. David was a nurturing and devoted dad, a sports coach from Toronto, Canada, who’d spent his entire professional life working with children.
But when David took Ian’s life during a psychotic episode, he was convinced that his wife Beth and daughter Gillian would thank him for getting rid of the “intolerable” burden Ian had become. David was tried for first-degree murder, but the judge ruled he was “not criminally responsible on account of a mental disorder”. Two forensic psychiatrists diagnosed him as being in a “major depression with psychotic episodes” when he killed Ian.
David was sent to a psychiatric hospital where he spent four years. On December 4, 2009, he received an absolute discharge: a finding of guilt, but with no criminal record.
It is a truly shocking and bitterly tragic story, and one that will divide opinion. David has always believed that his psychosis was caused by a type of antidepressant known as a selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor (SSRI). But it has not yet been proven that SSRIs were to blame.
David was taking paroxetine (sold as Paxil in the U.S. and called Seroxat in the UK). While the drugs appear to work for some people, SSRIs, like all medicines, can cause side-effects. Drowsiness, nausea, insomnia and loss of libido are some of the recognised ones. However, there is growing concern about other SSRI side-effects such as anxiety, agitation, hallucinations and paranoid delusions, which, although more rare, can have a devastating impact.
David Carmichael: he killed the son he loved
after they put him on seroxat
— § —
In these pages [‘The Pill That Steals Lives‘] filmmaker Katinka Blackford Newman, a previously super-fit mother of two, has described her terrifying experiences. Hours after taking her first SSRI dose she became psychotic.
“I didn’t harm my kids, Lily, now 15, and Oscar, now 14, but it still terrifies me that I might have done,” she says.
Katinka has since investigated other adverse reactions, meeting David Carmichael and others affected, “who made me realise it was pure luck I didn’t kill my children. I was determined to make this issue public, and so took my research to BBC Panorama.”
Panorama then takes up the story, asking: is it possible that a pill prescribed by your doctor can turn you into a killer?
More than 60 million prescriptions for anti-depressants were written in the UK in 2015.
LD : In the US the problem is even worse. One in six Americans is known to be on antidepressants or similar psychiatric drugs, with depression hitting more than twice the number of white Americans as it does Hispanics or African Americans. Depression is becoming a massive problem among teenagers, especially girls, with large numbers committing suicide every year. (See here).
All these drugs tend to be highly addictive and withdrawing from them is not easy, one of the results of withdrawal being a sharp increase in depression, with other unpleasant side effects. There is a wide variety of pretty pills to choose from: Citalopram (Celexa), Escitalopram (Lexapro or Cipralex), Paroxetine (Paxil or Seroxat), Fluoxetine (Prozac), Fluvoxamine (Luvox), and Sertraline (Zoloft or Lustral). These are known as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). Other frequently prescribed drugs with equally exotic names are Cymbalta, Desyrel, Effexor, Oleptro, Pexeva, Symbyax, and Viibryd.
Recent research has shown that prozac, one of the most popular antidepressants, is no better than a placebo. Moreover, antidepressants can cause brain damage and lead to suicide. [LD]
According to David Healy, a professor of psychiatry at Bangor University and a leading critic of SSRIs, as many as one in 1,000 people taking the medication is severely affected.
“There are probably up to an extra 2,500 suicides in Europe triggered by an SSRI antidepressant,” claims Professor Healy, who founded rxisk.org, a website that helps identify potential drug risks. Chillingly, he believes the figures are similar for episodes of violence, including mass killings.
In March 2012, 28 Belgian and Dutch schoolchildren and teachers were killed when the coach they were travelling in drove into the wall of a tunnel.
Investigators hired by the parents found that the driver was withdrawing from Paxil/Seroxat. They believe he killed himself while suffering delirium caused by fluctuating levels of the drug.
In the same year, at the premiere of a Batman film in Aurora, Colorado, James Holmes, a 24-year-old PhD student with no record of violence, murdered 12 people and injured 70.
He is serving multiple life sentences in jail, but questions have been asked as to whether the SSRI he’d been prescribed played a part.
Andreas Lubitz, the German pilot who on March 24, 2015, deliberately crashed a Germanwings flight into the French Alps, killing all 150 people on board, was taking antidepressants, including the SSRI mirtazapine.
While no one knows for sure why SSRIs may adversely affect some people and not others, Professor Healy believes David Carmichael was “almost certainly” in the grip of SSRI psychosis when he killed Ian.
At the time, David was running sports camps while his wife stayed at home to look after their children.
“I wanted to be the best worker, the best provider, the best father, and I stressed myself out to provide for my family,’ he tells me. “I got into the shower one morning and I started to shake. Over the next few weeks, I was conscious that my heart was racing and I lost confidence in things I’d always been able to do.”
His doctor diagnosed depression and prescribed 40mg of Paxil. “Right from the outset, I experienced akathisia — a compulsion to be in constant motion.’
This is a recognised side-effect of antidepressants and antipsychotics: statistics from clinical trials suggest that as many as one in 20 patients stops taking SSRI drugs because of agitation, with one in 100 experiencing hallucinations.
“I felt like I was coming out of my skin,” David says. “I was so agitated, I’d be pacing the floor in the middle of the night.” But the agitation died down after ten days and David began to feel better within six weeks. “I started to feel great. I thought I was recovered.”
But there were side-effects David didn’t like: excessive sweating, weight gain and sexual dysfunction. “These got me down, so I began to wean myself off them,” he says.
He doesn’t know why he didn’t go back to the doctor. Nor does he know why he didn’t consult his doctor before taking them again a year later. “I felt the symptoms coming on again: I was anxious and I could feel my confidence drain away. I had a full three-month prescription left over from the year before, so on July 8, 2004, I put myself back on 40mg a day.”
Almost immediately, David began to feel agitated again. “I started to feel incredibly negative, and suicidal thoughts raced through my mind,” he says. Thinking his depression was getting worse, he increased the dose to 60mg. “I believed it would help me recover more quickly, like taking two aspirin instead of one for a headache,” he says.
Over the next few days the akathisia subsided and, outwardly, David appeared to be functioning normally. “I’d get up, go to work. But inside, I was disintegrating. I became detached, unemotional and fixated on ending my life.’
David became convinced that he should end Ian’s life, too. “I felt strongly that it was my role as his dad to send him to a better place with me,” he says.
David’s 11-year-old son Ian (pictured right)
David describes a chilling state of calm as he worked his plan through. He decided to take Ian to the family’s weekend cottage where he would drown them both by going out in the family boat.
But when he found he’d forgotten to pack his own bathing shorts, he changed his mind.
David decided to kill Ian with medication he bought specifically for that purpose from a chemist. The day after buying it, he calmly researched how much time he’d spend in prison for murder, and what jail would be like.
David arranged to take Ian on a trip to an indoor BMX park he knew his son would love, followed by a night in their favourite hotel in London, Ontario.
Three days after buying the medication, David told Ian to kiss his mother goodbye and they headed off. “I wasn’t worried,” David recalls. “I knew in my wildly distorted mind that killing Ian was the right thing to do.”
The pair checked into the hotel on Saturday, July 30, ordering room service of all Ian’s favourite food and watching a superhero movie. All the while, David was fixated with the idea that he would sacrifice his freedom and go to prison for 25 years so Ian could go to a better place.
“Nothing kicked in, no innate sense that I was doing the wrong thing,” he says.
Just after 10pm, he poured the medication into a glass of orange juice for Ian. But, instead of becoming sleepy, his son became agitated and began to hallucinate. At 3am David “very calmly” strangled him.
When David was sure Ian was dead, he kissed him, told him he loved him and folded his hands over his chest. Then he watched TV “without any tears” for six hours before calling emergency services.
For two weeks, David remained in a psychotic state, with no comprehension of what he had done. CCTV from the police station shows him calmly shaking the hand of the pathologist who had attended the scene, as if nothing untoward had happened.
“I didn’t feel anything,” he says. “I thought that everyone would understand why I had to do what I’d done.”
When Beth was told that her son was dead and her husband was in custody, she collapsed, screaming. “A former boss came to see me and he said: ‘She will never forgive you.’ I remember saying: ‘What? Of course she will! I did this for all of us,’” says David.
Three days after this, reality finally filtered through. The pain was so excruciating David cried for “whole days. I’d shut my eyes, praying I’d die in my sleep.”
David’s daughter Gillian has never blamed him. He says her unconditional love and forgiveness gave him the motivation to carry on living. Alone in his cell he’d repeat the mantra: “I’m a good dad. I’m going to be a good dad again.”
The question now, says David, is: “What caused my psychosis? That’s what we’re dealing with now.” David believes akathisia is the key to recognising a potential risk. “Anyone who has been prescribed SSRIs who becomes agitated and restless should be monitored closely and, if necessary, taken off the drug,” he says.
He has taken out a $20 million lawsuit against GlaxoSmithKline, the maker of Seroxat, on the grounds of personal injury and product liability. “I believe there have been many, many deaths associated with Seroxat and I want to see the data on the table,’ says David.
When he was discharged from the psychiatric institution, the community and some family shunned David.
David and Beth now live in a different part of Canada, with Ian’s treasured BMX bike sitting in the hall. “Gillian and I have talked about Ian a lot, but Beth and I have only started talking about him,” he says. “Sometimes, we don’t even talk, we just hug.”
David says he has forgiven himself for Ian’s death. “I stopped beating myself up a long time ago. I recognise it was the drug and not me that killed my son.”
Based on The Pill That Steals Lives, by Katinka Blackford Newman
LD: Few people realize the gravity of the situation in America vis-à-vis antidepressants.
Not only are one in six Americans on antidepressants, antipsychotics, and anti-anxiety drugs, which is roughly 50 million Americans experiencing toxic side effects which in some instances drive them to suicide or else make them crazy enough to kill someone, but in addition over a million American children under six years old have been prescribed psychiatric drugs. Alarmingly, 274,000 babies under one year old are also on constant medication for anxiety.
Doctors have a wide variety of pills to choose from, and the pharmaceutical companies have been raking in a veritable bonanza of profits, thanks to an epidemic of artificially manufactured miseries — ranging from mass unemployment to job insecurity, and from huge increases in crime and social anarchy to the escalation of all types of systematically created vices and addictions. Obviously an outbreak of happiness would be extremely bad for business. [LD]
Source: CIA mind control morphed into psychiatry? « Jon Rappoport’s Blog
With permission from
jonrappoport.wordpress.com
by Jon Rappoport
July 11, 2017
Here is a new introduction to a piece I wrote several years ago. Then I’ll reprint the piece.
The famous CIA mind-control program, MKULTRA, always used psychiatrists; often these professionals headed up projects; they carried out the bulk of the research. But what I’m talking about here is the “evolution” of MKULTRA into mainstream psychiatry that affects the lives of millions of people every day.
I’ve demonstrated, on a number of occasions, that not one of the 300 so-called official mental disorders has a lab test to back up the diagnosis. No defining lab test. No blood test, no saliva test, no brain scan, no genetic assay. All 300 “disorders” are described and defined by committees of psychiatrists—and their non-scientific decisions are published in the DSM, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, published by the American Psychiatric Association.
Unfortunately, the treatments for every one of these arbitrary diagnoses are toxic drugs; drugs that addle the brain; drugs that reduce people to a state of abject dependence; drugs that make people think they’re insane; drugs that cause violent behavior; drugs that create life-threatening problems when patients try to withdraw from them quickly; drugs whose effects mimic the very descriptions of mental illness.
In other words, modern psychiatry, backed by drug makers, has an ideal formula for disabling populations.
So it’s more than interesting that the CIA has pursued a mind control program (MKULTRA) to achieve, in certain respects, the same objectives.
—end of introduction—now here is my piece on a forgotten CIA document:
Drugs to transform individuals…and even, by implication, society.
Drug research going far beyond the usual brief descriptions of MKULTRA.
The intention is there, in the record:
A CIA document was included in the transcript of the 1977 US Senate Hearings on MKULTRA, the CIA’s mind-control program.
The document is found in Appendix C, starting on page 166. It’s simply labeled “Draft,” dated 5 May 1955 (note: scroll down to #123-125 in the document).
It states: “A portion of the Research and Development Program of [CIA’s] TSS/Chemical Division is devoted to the discovery of the following materials and methods:”
What followed was a list of hoped-for drugs and their uses.
First, a bit of background: MKULTRA did not end in 1962, as advertised. It was shifted over to the Agency’s Office of Research and Development.
John Marks is the author of the groundbreaking 1979 book, Search for the Manchurian Candidate, which helped expose MKULTRA. Marks told me a CIA representative informed him that the continuation of MKULTRA, after 1962, was carried out with a greater degree of secrecy, and he, Marks, would never see a scrap of paper about it.
I’m printing below, the list of the 1955 intentions of the CIA regarding their own drug research. The range of those intentions is stunning.
Some of my comments gleaned from studying the list:
The CIA wanted to find substances which would “promote illogical thinking and impulsiveness.” Serious consideration should be given to the idea that psychiatric medications would eventually satisfy that requirement.
The CIA wanted to find chemicals that “would produce the signs and symptoms of recognized diseases in a reversible way.” This suggests many possibilities—among them the use of drugs to fabricate diseases and thereby give the false impression of germ-caused epidemics.
The CIA wanted to find drugs that would “produce amnesia.” Ideal for discrediting whistleblowers, dissidents, certain political candidates, and other investigators. (Scopolamine is such a drug.)
The CIA wanted to discover drugs which would produce “paralysis of the legs, acute anemia, etc.” A way to make people decline in health as if from diseases.
The CIA wanted to develop drugs that would “alter personality structure” and thus induce a person’s dependence on another person. How about dependence in general? For instance, dependence on institutions, governments?
The CIA wanted to discover chemicals that would “lower the ambition and general working efficiency of men.” Sounds like a general description of the devolution of society.
As you read the list yourself, you’ll see more implications/possibilities.
Here, from 1955, are the types of drugs the MKULTRA men at the CIA were looking for. The following statements are direct CIA quotes:
A portion of the Research and Development Program of TSS/Chemical Division is devoted to the discovery of the following materials and methods:
1. Substances which will promote illogical thinking and impulsiveness to the point where the recipient would be discredited in public.
2. Substances which increase the efficiency of mentation and perception.
3. Materials which will prevent or counteract the intoxicating effect of alcohol.
4. Materials which will promote the intoxicating effect of alcohol.
5. Materials which will produce the signs and symptoms of recognized diseases in a reversible way so that they may be used for malingering, etc.
6. Materials which will render the induction of hypnosis easier or otherwise enhance its usefulness.
7. Substances which will enhance the ability of individuals to withstand privation, torture and coercion during interrogation and so-called “brain-washing”.
8. Materials and physical methods which will produce amnesia for events preceding and during their use.
9. Physical methods of producing shock and confusion over extended periods of time and capable of surreptitious use.
10. Substances which produce physical disablement such as paralysis of the legs, acute anemia, etc.
11. Substances which will produce “pure” euphoria with no subsequent let-down.
12. Substances which alter personality structure in such a way that the tendency of the recipient to become dependent upon another person is enhanced.
13. A material which will cause mental confusion of such a type that the individual under its influence will find it difficult to maintain a fabrication under questioning.
14. Substances which will lower the ambition and general working efficiency of men when administered in undetectable amounts.
15. Substances which promote weakness or distortion of the eyesight or hearing faculties, preferably without permanent effects.
16. A knockout pill which can surreptitiously be administered in drinks, food, cigarettes, as an aerosol, etc., which will be safe to use, provide a maximum of amnesia, and be suitable for use by agent types on an ad hoc basis.
17. A material which can be surreptitiously administered by the above routes and which in very small amounts will make it impossible for a man to perform any physical activity whatsoever.
—end of quoted section from the 1955 CIA document—At the end of this 1955 CIA document, the author [unnamed] makes these remarks: “In practice, it has been possible to use outside cleared contractors for the preliminary phases of this [research] work. However, that part which involves human testing at effective dose levels presents security problems which cannot be handled by the ordinary contactors.”
“The proposed [human testing] facility [deletion] offers a unique opportunity for the secure handling of such clinical testing in addition to the many advantages outlined in the project proposal. The security problems mentioned above are eliminated by the fact that the responsibility for the testing will rest completely upon the physician and the hospital. [one line deleted] will allow [CIA] TSS/CD personnel to supervise the work very closely to make sure that all tests are conducted according to the recognized practices and embody adequate safeguards.”
In other words, this was to be ultra-secret. No outside contractors at universities for the core of the experiments, which by the way could be carried forward for decades.
A secret in-house facility.
Over the years, more facilities could be created.
If you examine the full range of psychiatric drugs developed since 1955, you’ll see that a number of them fit the CIA’s agenda. Speed-type chemicals to addle the brain over the long term, to treat so-called ADHD. Anti-psychotic drugs [Haldol, Risperdal, etc.], AKA “major tranquilizers,” to render patients more and more dependent on others (and government) as they sink into profound disability and incur motor brain damage. And of course, the SSRI antidepressants, like Prozac and Paxil and Zoloft, which produce extreme and debilitating highs and lows—and also push people over the edge into committing violence.
These drugs drag the whole society down into lower and lower levels of consciousness and action.
If that’s the goal of a very powerful and clandestine government agency…it’s succeeding. In mainstream psychiatry.
Jon Rappoport
The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at NoMoreFakeNews.com or OutsideTheRealityMachine.
Source: Study Finds That Dolphins Purposefully Get High By Doing This (VIDEO) – True Activist
trueactivist.com
Recent BBC footage showed the dolphins enjoying the high.
Credit: BBC
A new discovery has just been made about dolphins which states that they get recreationally high by using pufferfish. The act of the dolphins seeking out the pufferfish, catching them in their mouths and swimming around with them is what causes the high, due to the neurotoxic chemical that pufferfish release as they balloon up when they feel that they are in trouble. Although ordinarily, the chemical can kill, in the small doses that are absorbed by the dolphins, it simply gives them a high, according to recent reports.
The specific chemical is said to produce an effect similar to narcotics, although the dolphins have cleverly mastered the way to obtain the perfect amount of it, which means that they feel the high without suffering any of the negative damage. The subject was recently explored, and filmed, in a BBC One show that was created by the award-winning wildlife documentary producer John Downer. The stunning images that were captured depict the dolphins on a high and absolutely loving it, as well as how the dolphins seem to release the pufferfish after they have obtained the right amount of the chemical from them.
Rob Pilley, a zoologist working as a producer on the show, explained exactly what he interpreted happening. He said, “this was a case of young dolphins purposely experimenting with something we know to be intoxicating. After chewing the puffer gently and passing it round, they began acting most peculiarly, hanging around with their noses at the surface as if fascinated by their own reflection. It reminded us of that craze a few years ago when people started licking toads to get a buzz, especially the way they hung there in a daze afterward. It was the most extraordinary thing to see.”
First, a bit of background: MKULTRA did not end in 1962, as advertised. It was shifted over to the Agency’s Office of Research and Development.
Source: CIA MKULTRA: Drugs to Ruin the Nation
Drugs to transform individuals…and even, by implication, society.
Drug research going far beyond the usual brief descriptions of MKULTRA.
The intention is there, in the record:
A CIA document was included in the transcript of the 1977 US Senate Hearings on MKULTRA, the CIA’s mind-control program.
The document is found in Appendix C, starting on page 166. It’s simply labeled “Draft,” dated 5 May 1955 (note: scroll down to #123-125 in the document).
It states: “A portion of the Research and Development Program of [CIA’s] TSS/Chemical Division is devoted to the discovery of the following materials and methods:”
What followed was a list of hoped-for drugs and their uses.
First, a bit of background: MKULTRA did not end in 1962, as advertised. It was shifted over to the Agency’s Office of Research and Development.
John Marks is the author of the groundbreaking book, Search for the Manchurian Candidate, which exposed MKULTRA. Marks told me a CIA representative informed him that the continuation of MKULTRA, after 1962, was carried out with a greater degree of secrecy, and he, Marks, would never see a scrap of paper about it.
I’m printing below, the list of the 1955 intentions of the CIA regarding their own drug research. The range of those intentions is stunning.
Some of my comments gleaned from studying the list:
The CIA wanted to find substances which would “promote illogical thinking and impulsiveness.” Serious consideration should be given to the idea that psychiatric medications, food additives, herbicides, and industrial chemicals (like fluorides) would eventually satisfy that requirement.
The CIA wanted to find chemicals that “would produce the signs and symptoms of recognized diseases in a reversible way.” This suggests many possibilities—among them the use of drugs to fabricate diseases and thereby give the false impression of germ-caused epidemics.
The CIA wanted to find drugs that would “produce amnesia.” Ideal for discrediting whistleblowers, dissidents, certain political candidates, and other investigators. (Scopolamine, for example.)
The CIA wanted to discover drugs which would produce “paralysis of the legs, acute anemia, etc.” A way to make people decline in health as if from diseases.
The CIA wanted to develop drugs that would “alter personality structure” and thus induce a person’s dependence on another person. How about dependence in general? For instance, dependence on institutions, governments?
The CIA wanted to discover chemicals that would “lower the ambition and general working efficiency of men.” Sounds like a general description of the devolution of society.
As you read the list yourself, you’ll see more implications/possibilities.
Here, from 1955, are the types of drugs the MKULTRA men at the CIA were looking for. The following statements are direct CIA quotes:
A portion of the Research and Development Program of TSS/Chemical Division is devoted to the discovery of the following materials and methods:
1. Substances which will promote illogical thinking and impulsiveness to the point where the recipient would be discredited in public.
2. Substances which increase the efficiency of mentation and perception.
3. Materials which will prevent or counteract the intoxicating effect of alcohol.
4. Materials which will promote the intoxicating effect of alcohol.
5. Materials which will produce the signs and symptoms of recognized diseases in a reversible way so that they may be used for malingering, etc.
6. Materials which will render the induction of hypnosis easier or otherwise enhance its usefulness.
7. Substances which will enhance the ability of individuals to withstand privation, torture and coercion during interrogation and so-called “brain-washing”.
8. Materials and physical methods which will produce amnesia for events preceding and during their use.
9. Physical methods of producing shock and confusion over extended periods of time and capable of surreptitious use.
10. Substances which produce physical disablement such as paralysis of the legs, acute anemia, etc.
11. Substances which will produce “pure” euphoria with no subsequent let-down.
12. Substances which alter personality structure in such a way that the tendency of the recipient to become dependent upon another person is enhanced.
13. A material which will cause mental confusion of such a type that the individual under its influence will find it difficult to maintain a fabrication under questioning.
14. Substances which will lower the ambition and general working efficiency of men when administered in undetectable amounts.
15. Substances which promote weakness or distortion of the eyesight or hearing faculties, preferably without permanent effects.
16. A knockout pill which can surreptitiously be administered in drinks, food, cigarettes, as an aerosol, etc., which will be safe to use, provide a maximum of amnesia, and be suitable for use by agent types on an ad hoc basis.
17. A material which can be surreptitiously administered by the above routes and which in very small amounts will make it impossible for a man to perform any physical activity whatsoever.
At the end of this 1955 CIA document, the author [unnamed] makes these remarks: “In practice, it has been possible to use outside cleared contractors for the preliminary phases of this [research] work. However, that part which involves human testing at effective dose levels presents security problems which cannot be handled by the ordinary contactors.
“The proposed [human testing] facility [deletion] offers a unique opportunity for the secure handling of such clinical testing in addition to the many advantages outlined in the project proposal. The security problems mentioned above are eliminated by the fact that the responsibility for the testing will rest completely upon the physician and the hospital. [one line deleted] will allow [CIA] TSS/CD personnel to supervise the work very closely to make sure that all tests are conducted according to the recognized practices and embody adequate safeguards.”
In other words, this was to be ultra-secret. No outside contractors at universities for the core of the experiments, which by the way could be carried forward for decades.
A secret in-house facility.
Over the years, more facilities could be created.
If you examine the full range of psychiatric drugs developed since 1955, you’ll see that a number of them fit the CIA’s agenda. Speed-type chemicals to addle the brain over the long term, to treat so-called ADHD. Anti-psychotic drugs, AKA “major tranquilizers,” to render patients more and more dependent on others (and government) as they sink into profound disability and incur motor brain damage. And of course, the SSRI antidepressants, like Prozac and Paxil and Zoloft, which produce extreme and debilitating highs and lows—and also push people over the edge into committing violence.
These drugs drag the whole society down into lower and lower levels of consciousness and action.
If that’s the goal of a very powerful and clandestine government agency…it’s succeeding.
(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)
The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at NoMoreFakeNews.com or OutsideTheRealityMachine.
Image Credit: Dees Illustration
Wiki
Source: CIA MKULTRA: drugs to take down the nation « Jon Rappoport’s Blog
With permission from
jonrappoport.wordpress.com
November 29, 2016
Drugs to transform individuals…and even, by implication, society.
Drug research going far beyond the usual brief descriptions of MKULTRA.
The intention is there, in the record:
A CIA document was included in the transcript of the 1977 US Senate Hearings on MKULTRA, the CIA’s mind-control program.
The document is found in Appendix C, starting on page 166. It’s simply labeled “Draft,” dated 5 May 1955 (note: scroll down to #123-125 in the document).
It states: “A portion of the Research and Development Program of [CIA’s] TSS/Chemical Division is devoted to the discovery of the following materials and methods:”
What followed was a list of hoped-for drugs and their uses.
First, a bit of background: MKULTRA did not end in 1962, as advertised. It was shifted over to the Agency’s Office of Research and Development.
John Marks is the author of the groundbreaking book, Search for the Manchurian Candidate, which exposed MKULTRA. Marks told me a CIA representative informed him that the continuation of MKULTRA, after 1962, was carried out with a greater degree of secrecy, and he, Marks, would never see a scrap of paper about it.
I’m printing below, the list of the 1955 intentions of the CIA regarding their own drug research. The range of those intentions is stunning.
Some of my comments gleaned from studying the list:
The CIA wanted to find substances which would “promote illogical thinking and impulsiveness.” Serious consideration should be given to the idea that psychiatric medications, food additives, herbicides, and industrial chemicals (like fluorides) would eventually satisfy that requirement.
The CIA wanted to find chemicals that “would produce the signs and symptoms of recognized diseases in a reversible way.” This suggests many possibilities—among them the use of drugs to fabricate diseases and thereby give the false impression of germ-caused epidemics.
The CIA wanted to find drugs that would “produce amnesia.” Ideal for discrediting whistleblowers, dissidents, certain political candidates, and other investigators. (Scopolamine, for example.)
The CIA wanted to discover drugs which would produce “paralysis of the legs, acute anemia, etc.” A way to make people decline in health as if from diseases.
The CIA wanted to develop drugs that would “alter personality structure” and thus induce a person’s dependence on another person. How about dependence in general? For instance, dependence on institutions, governments?
The CIA wanted to discover chemicals that would “lower the ambition and general working efficiency of men.” Sounds like a general description of the devolution of society.
As you read the list yourself, you’ll see more implications/possibilities.
Here, from 1955, are the types of drugs the MKULTRA men at the CIA were looking for. The following statements are direct CIA quotes:
A portion of the Research and Development Program of TSS/Chemical Division is devoted to the discovery of the following materials and methods:
1. Substances which will promote illogical thinking and impulsiveness to the point where the recipient would be discredited in public.
2. Substances which increase the efficiency of mentation and perception.
3. Materials which will prevent or counteract the intoxicating effect of alcohol.
4. Materials which will promote the intoxicating effect of alcohol.
5. Materials which will produce the signs and symptoms of recognized diseases in a reversible way so that they may be used for malingering, etc.
6. Materials which will render the induction of hypnosis easier or otherwise enhance its usefulness.
7. Substances which will enhance the ability of individuals to withstand privation, torture and coercion during interrogation and so-called “brain-washing”.
8. Materials and physical methods which will produce amnesia for events preceding and during their use.
9. Physical methods of producing shock and confusion over extended periods of time and capable of surreptitious use.
10. Substances which produce physical disablement such as paralysis of the legs, acute anemia, etc.
11. Substances which will produce “pure” euphoria with no subsequent let-down.
12. Substances which alter personality structure in such a way that the tendency of the recipient to become dependent upon another person is enhanced.
13. A material which will cause mental confusion of such a type that the individual under its influence will find it difficult to maintain a fabrication under questioning.
14. Substances which will lower the ambition and general working efficiency of men when administered in undetectable amounts.
15. Substances which promote weakness or distortion of the eyesight or hearing faculties, preferably without permanent effects.
16. A knockout pill which can surreptitiously be administered in drinks, food, cigarettes, as an aerosol, etc., which will be safe to use, provide a maximum of amnesia, and be suitable for use by agent types on an ad hoc basis.
17. A material which can be surreptitiously administered by the above routes and which in very small amounts will make it impossible for a man to perform any physical activity whatsoever.At the end of this 1955 CIA document, the author [unnamed] makes these remarks: “In practice, it has been possible to use outside cleared contractors for the preliminary phases of this [research] work. However, that part which involves human testing at effective dose levels presents security problems which cannot be handled by the ordinary contactors.
“The proposed [human testing] facility [deletion] offers a unique opportunity for the secure handling of such clinical testing in addition to the many advantages outlined in the project proposal. The security problems mentioned above are eliminated by the fact that the responsibility for the testing will rest completely upon the physician and the hospital. [one line deleted] will allow [CIA] TSS/CD personnel to supervise the work very closely to make sure that all tests are conducted according to the recognized practices and embody adequate safeguards.”
In other words, this was to be ultra-secret. No outside contractors at universities for the core of the experiments, which by the way could be carried forward for decades.
A secret in-house facility.
Over the years, more facilities could be created.
If you examine the full range of psychiatric drugs developed since 1955, you’ll see that a number of them fit the CIA’s agenda. Speed-type chemicals to addle the brain over the long term, to treat so-called ADHD. Anti-psychotic drugs, AKA “major tranquilizers,” to render patients more and more dependent on others (and government) as they sink into profound disability and incur motor brain damage. And of course, the SSRI antidepressants, like Prozac and Paxil and Zoloft, which produce extreme and debilitating highs and lows—and also push people over the edge into committing violence.
These drugs drag the whole society down into lower and lower levels of consciousness and action.
If that’s the goal of a very powerful and clandestine government agency…it’s succeeding.
Jon Rappoport
The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at NoMoreFakeNews.com or OutsideTheRealityMachine.
Source: So, For How Long has Washington been on Dope? | New Eastern Outlook
journal-neo.org
It’s safe to say that the abuse of painkillers and psychotropic drugs has become epidemic in the United States, while the situation is being aggravated by the struggle for the legalization of marijuana that has been on the rise in most states. Recently, the Attorney General of the United State, Loretta Lynch has stressed the catastrophic effect that the systematic drug abuse has had on all layers of the American society.
This sinister addiction has been manifesting itself in the growing number of crimes being committed all across the country. According to the American Thinker, the number of crimes committed under the influence of drugs has increased by 17% in Washington and Colorado. Yet, it won’t be an exaggeration to state that the US hasn’t realized what kind of a Pandora box it has opened.
But the rise of crime is not the only way the systematic drug abuse manifests itself in the American society, since it seems that certain statements of the prominent representatives of US political and business elites were made under painkillers and psychotropic drugs. This “deviant behavior” has recently been manifesting itself in the Russophobic remarks that can often be heard in Washington these days.
Just take a look at one of the articles featured in The Washington Post:
While we’re on the subject of Vladimir Putin, it’s worth noting another way Russia is working against US interests. Russia is helping to sustain the war on drugs. Russia can also surely see that the war on drugs is weakening the United States.
This article partially explaining the sudden row of accusations against Russia, that one could only make while being high as a kite.
For example, the US State Department has decided to announce that Russia fabricated the Northern Lights, to undermine mental fortitude of the American population. The White House spokesman Josh Ernest has claimed that:
The motive is obvious The constant flashing and gyrating shapes in the sky are intended to cause sleep deprivation. When people do not get enough sleep, their guard is down. The Russians are trying to undermine our national security with this cheap stunt.
In turn, US Ambassador to the UN, Samantha Power, has just recently demanded the United Nations Security Council to introduce a regime of economic sanctions against Russia “for tampering with the electromagnetic field of the Earth”.
In her latest speech, the US Air Force General Nina M. Armagno stated that there’s a distinct Russian-Chinese threat coming from space, which by 2025 will threaten all the US satellites.
If those reports are not enough to blow one’s top off, how about the announcement that the State of California just decriminalized child prostitution. Therefore, it is no longer illegal for anyone under the age of 18 to engage in prostitution or to solicit money for sex. CBS Sacramento has reported that Governor Jerry Brown signed the bill that exempts minors from the current California prostitution laws. In other words, a person under the age of 18 can no longer be arrested for violating prostitution laws that apply to adults.
Against this background, the recent arrest of Fairfax City Mayor Richard “Scott” Silverthorne for his attempt to pay for gay sex with drugs seems rather strange, since it must be the typical sort of behavior for the American political elites today.
It’s clear that American politicians have lost touch with reality, since they fail to recognize how delusional their statements sound. Probably, to get American elected representatives off drugs one must call WADA, which must be pretty convenient, since the latter has been working for Washington for quite a while now.
Grete Mautner is an independent researcher and journalist from Germany, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook.”
Patrick Henningsen | In addition to fuelling the West’s insurgency, these drugs are being used to terrorize local populations and shock western media consumers.
Source: CIA Drug Wars Could Explain Why Syrian ‘Rebels’, ISIS Violence Fuelled by Captagon Pills
Patrick Henningsen
October 14, 2016
When commenting on the horrors of ISIS and all of their violent videos promoted around the clock by CNN and other mainstream media outlets, I will often hear people say, “This is just pure evil. How could they do such horrible things?” Far from being some existential mystery, there are answers to these questions, but if you are waiting for your elected representatives or their highly paid media surrogates to provide any, you will be waiting in vain.
This week, yet another clue surfaced when Lebanon’s Daily Star reported:
“The Internal Security Forces announced Tuesday that an operation to smuggle 3.5 million Captagon pills into Saudi Arabia has been foiled…”
“Captagon? Never heard of it,” would be your standard answer in the west.
This story is much deeper than most people realize. Captagon is a highly addictive compound, presently produced in places like Lebanon and Syria and currently expanding to other locations across the region. Here’s where it gets interesting: its proceeds inject hundreds of millions of dollars back into Syria’s black-market. It would not be an exaggeration to say that this is one of the main drivers of this war.
This is one item which US officials generally will not comment on, much less try and mitigate. The reason for this is simple: Captagon is a major asset in the US Coalition’s primary directive in Syria: to destabilize the state and overthrow the government of Bashar al Assad in Damascus.
The drug gives Washington’s “rebels” a crucial edge.
“A powerful amphetamine tablet based on the original synthetic drug known as “fenethylline,” Captagon quickly produces a euphoric intensity in users, allowing Syria’s fighters to stay up for days, killing with a numb, reckless abandon.” (Source: Washington Post)
Pills sell for between $5 and $20 per tablet and according to a report filed by The Guardian is popular with western-backed ‘rebels’ and fellow travellers from western Europe who don’t follow, “strict interpretations of Islamic law.”
The ‘moderate rebel’ wonder drug? (Image Source: Menaribo)
The Saudi Connection
Most people will know by now that Saudi Arabia and Qatar are some of the chief financial sponsors of the Syrian Conflict and have a vested interest in seeing its Takfiri terrorist forces succeed. It seems that Saudi is prepared to go to any lengths in making that happen.
This time last year during a drug bust at Beirut’s Rafik Hariri International Airport, Lebanon security services arrested a Saudi prince (identified as Abdel Mohsen Bin Walid Bin Abdulaziz) for attempting to smuggle two tonnes of amphetamines on his private jet.
The Burning Blogger of Bedlam followed-up on this report by adding:
“This recent seizure of amphetamines involving the Saudi prince in Lebanon is simply the latest tell-tale incident. Not very long ago, a reported shipment of around 6 million captagon pills were seized, headed for ISIS/ISIL fighters in Syria, and the accusation was being made from multiple sources that NATO itself began production of the drug in a Bulgarian laboratory in 2011 – the very year of the Libyan and Syrian ‘uprisings’ – and that they are now also producing the drug elsewhere too.By now, I would suggest we have enough evidence to suggest that these drugs have been driving much of the most ultra-violent terrorism since 2011, first in Libya, then Syria and Iraq, and that the drug has been steadily provided by agencies within NATO, Saudi Arabia and possibly other sources, from the very start. Which, if true, would provide a very different context to some of the more inhuman, shocking behaviour of jihadists and extremists; including mass beheadings or, for example, the setting alight of the Jordanian pilot or even the sadistic rape and murder of Gaddafi himself in October 2011.”
Indeed, it was the late Libyan leader Mummar Gaddafi who warned the world (to no avail) how, from the very onset of NATO’s operation to take down Libya, Al-Qaeda leaders and their operatives were supplying young men “free drugs and weapons” and telling them to ‘join the fight’ (read more here).
This video aired on Syrian TV in 2014, which shows one crazed Al Nusra fighter (armed and financed by the US and Saudi Arabia) high on Captagon. What he says is very telling:
.
As it turns out, this brand of subterfuge is well-thread ground for Washington and the CIA – who have relied on drugs to fuel key aspects of past dirty wars, including in Vietnam, Cambodia, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Honduras, Guatemala, Colombia, Bosnia, Kosovo, Afghanistan, Iraq and now it seems, in Syria, too. Nearly all of these dirty wars have featured death squads, and resulting in a massive outflow of refugees.
Drugs serve various purposes for the US and its allies, including corrupting local populations, undermining state structures by promoting ‘warlordism’ and organized crime syndicates, providing a cheap stimulant for guerrilla fighters, and most importantly – a way to raise dark cash to fund insurgency groups. Menaribo puts this into historical perspective:
“In every war that occurred in the last century there was some kind of stimulant consumed by fighters to give them a physical and mental superiority. During World War II, the Nazi soldiers were first given Pervitin pills (known as Speed today) to boost endurance during the invasions of Poland and France. Post-war, the USA put hand on this Nazi invention but found its soldiers addicted to heroin during the Vietnam War. In the early 70’s a new more social drug appeared, cocaine, not long before it took a major role in conflicts around the world mainly in Africa, Lebanon and Latin America.”
In 2001, Executive Intelligence Review described the phenomenon as follows:
“In general, the official justification for support for such groups, is that a particular group, even if devoted to criminal activities, “must” be supported, on behalf of some higher necessity, often “national security.” This was the justification for the support by British and U.S. agencies to the Afghan mujahideen after the 1979 Soviet invasion of that country; as for that given to the Nicaraguan Contras. Both groups financed themselves, and a much bigger structure, with a huge traffic in cocaine, in the case of the Contras, and opium/heroin in the case of the Afghanistan “freedom fighters.” This was tolerated, or even aided, by Western agencies.
With permission from
July 30, 2016
At the time when Aldous Huxley received George Orwell’s iconic book 1984, Huxley’s eye-sight was already deteriorating quickly.
But because he concerned himself with the monumental importance of the subject of the book, he took the arduous effort to finish it.
What follows is an exploration of Huxley’s thoughts on the haunting future envisioned in the totalitarian world of 1984.
Huxley starts by praising Orwell’s vision of dystopia and the accuracy with which Orwell highlights the ruling elite’s deep-rooted belief that they can and should control the entire human organism, their perception, thoughts, and feelings.
Huxley believed when we can all become critical of these agenda’s we will have “the Ultimate Revolution.”
Yet, Huxley believed one single determining factor would in the end prove Orwell wrong: namely, efficiency.
“The policy of boot-on-the-face,” as Huxley called it, is wasteful. It takes too much energy to sustain itself.
Because of Huxley’s intimate knowledge of mind-altering drugs, psychological conditioning, and the sedating effects narcotics, he knew there was something far more powerful to manipulate the masses. And he was right.
But the fact that we don’t see the “boot” regularly doesn’t make Orwell wrong. You only have to look at the truth of our situation today to see that both of their radical insights act perfectly in conjunction.
Read Aldous Huxley’s prophetic letter to George Orwell Regarding 1984 below:
Wrightwood. Cal.
21 October, 1949
Dear Mr. Orwell,
It was very kind of you to tell your publishers to send me a copy of your book.
It arrived as I was in the midst of a piece of work that required much reading and consulting of references; and since poor sight makes it necessary for me to ration my reading, I had to wait a long time before being able to embark on Nineteen Eighty-Four.
Agreeing with all that the critics have written of it, I need not tell you, yet once more, how fine and how profoundly important the book is.
May I speak instead of the thing with which the book deals — the ultimate revolution?
The first hints of a philosophy of the ultimate revolution — the revolution which lies beyond politics and economics, and which aims at total subversion of the individual’s psychology and physiology — are to be found in the Marquis de Sade, who regarded himself as the continuator, the consummator, of Robespierre and Babeuf.
The philosophy of the ruling minority in Nineteen Eighty-Four is a sadism which has been carried to its logical conclusion by going beyond sex and denying it.
Whether in actual fact the policy of the boot-on-the-face can go on indefinitely seems doubtful.
My own belief is that the ruling oligarchy will find less arduous and wasteful ways of governing and of satisfying its lust for power, and these ways will resemble those which I described in Brave New World.
I have had occasion recently to look into the history of animal magnetism and hypnotism, and have been greatly struck by the way in which, for a hundred and fifty years, the world has refused to take serious cognizance of the discoveries of Mesmer, Braid, Esdaile, and the rest.
Partly because of the prevailing materialism and partly because of prevailing respectability, nineteenth-century philosophers and men of science were not willing to investigate the odder facts of psychology for practical men, such as politicians, soldiers and policemen, to apply in the field of government.
Thanks to the voluntary ignorance of our fathers, the advent of the ultimate revolution was delayed for five or six generations.
Another lucky accident was Freud’s inability to hypnotize successfully and his consequent disparagement of hypnotism.
This delayed the general application of hypnotism to psychiatry for at least forty years.
But now psycho-analysis is being combined with hypnosis; and hypnosis has been made easy and indefinitely extensible through the use of barbiturates, which induce a hypnoid and suggestible state in even the most recalcitrant subjects.
Within the next generation I believe that the world’s rulers will discover that infant conditioning and narco-hypnosis are more efficient, as instruments of government, than clubs and prisons, and that the lust for power can be just as completely satisfied by suggesting people into loving their servitude as by flogging and kicking them into obedience.
In other words, I feel that the nightmare of Nineteen Eighty-Four is destined to modulate into the nightmare of a world having more resemblance to that which I imagined in Brave New World.
The change will be brought about as a result of a felt need for increased efficiency.
Meanwhile, of course, there may be a large scale biological and atomic war — in which case we shall have nightmares of other and scarcely imaginable kinds.
Thank you once again for the book.
Yours sincerely,
Aldous Huxley
According to Huxley, then, the “boot” would transmute into a happy-pill because of a “felt need for increased efficiency.”
The nightmare Huxley envisioned is nightmarish exactly because it wouldn’t be experienced as a nightmare, it would just be considered normal.
If we finally break out of the force-fed bubble of egotism and passivity and educate ourselves of the truth amidst the swamp of disinformation, the boot still comes down.
We might not live in either fully realised dystopia yet, but there are alarming trends that a conjunction of both are possible.
Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World and George Orwell’s 1984 are available on Amazon and every good bookstore.
Source: Researchers to Trial Ketamine as a Treatment for Alcoholism | Natural Society
With permission from