UFOs/UAPs/Ufology/Aliens
…Mr. Grusch accused the Pentagon and its private contractors of covering up a “multi-decade” program to reverse-engineer technology retrieved from crashed UFOs piloted by “non-human” beings, or “biologics” as he called them.
SUNDAY, JAN 14, 2024
Authored by Wim De Gent via NTD News,
A classified briefing on UFOs delivered to members of the House Oversight and Accountability Committee on Friday elicited a mixed response, with some saying they were dissatisfied by the fragmented information presented, while others were grateful to receive some more clarity.
Interest in UFOs, which officials now call unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP), surged in July 2023 when the Oversight Committee invited Air Force veteran David Grusch to speak after he’d filed a formal complaint with the Inspector General of the U.S. intelligence community, claiming “the U.S. government is operating with secrecy—above Congressional oversight” on the subject.
David Grusch, former National Reconnaissance Officer Representative on the Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Task Force, arrives to testify during a House Subcommittee on National Security, the Border, and Foreign Affairs hearing titled “Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena: Implications on National Security Public Safety and Government Transparency,” on Capitol Hill in Washington, on July 26, 2023. (Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images)
During that hearing, Mr. Grusch accused the Pentagon and its private contractors of covering up a “multi-decade” program to reverse-engineer technology retrieved from crashed UFOs piloted by “non-human” beings, or “biologics” as he called them.
He also mentioned knowledge of people harmed or injured in efforts to cover up or conceal the extraterrestrial technology program.
Though apparently only limited information was disclosed during Friday’s 90-minute briefing at the Capitol Building in Washington, the attendees agreed that the hearing seemed to confirm Mr. Grusch’s claims.
“Based on what we heard,” Rep. Jared Moskowitz (D-Fla.) said, “many of Grusch[’s] claims have merit!”
“I think everybody left there thinking and knowing that Grusch is legit—if they didn’t think that before,” attested Rep. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.).
The Tennessee legislator, one of the stronger voices calling for transparency on the issue of UAPs, nevertheless left the meeting somewhat frustrated, saying the meeting was just “more of the same.”
“By design this issue is very compartmentalized,” he explained. “It’s like looking down the barrel of a .22 rifle. All they know is just right in that little circle.”
“Now it’s just whack-a-mole—you go to the next [briefing], until we get some answers.”
For Rep. Andy Ogles (R-Tenn.) the limited information presented only proved there was a “concerted effort to conceal as much information as possible—both in Congress and to the general public.”
“I asked very specific questions and was unable to get specific answers,” he said. “And so that’s a problem, and we’re not going to stop until we get the truth.”
Rep. Eric Burlison (R-Mont.) was a bit more optimistic, calling the briefing a step in the right direction.
“I think that some people were looking for things,” he said. “This was not the venue to determine those things, but for me, I got a lot of clarity,” he added.
Rep. Robert Garcia (D-Calif.) was glad that “every one that was in the room received probably new information.”
Earlier this week, Mr. Garcia introduced the Safe Airspace for Americans Act, along with Rep. Glenn Grothman (R-Wisconsin), a bill that enables civilian pilots and personnel to report UAP sightings with the Federal Aviation Administration.
During the July hearing, Mr. Grusch said he hoped that unearthing the non-human reverse engineering programs will act as “a catalyst for a global reassessment of our priorities.”
A Pentagon spokesperson replied at the time that it has not found “any verifiable information to substantiate claims that any programs regarding the possession or reverse-engineering of extraterrestrial materials have existed in the past or exist currently.”
“This is not about whether there are aliens or there are not aliens,” Mr. Moskowitz, a member of the UAP Caucus, said in early December. “The problem is when we ask those questions, rather than being provided information that would prove it false, they stonewall the information, and that is what piques the interest.”
This is long but if you want to know where we are with the alien disclosure, this is it.
“The non-human intelligence phenomenon is real. We are not alone. Retrievals are not limited to the United States.
Níall Feiritear
Sunday World
Tue, 05 Dec 2023
George Knapp and Dr Colm Kelleher
In 2017, The New York Times published a series of articles exposing a hidden Pentagon programme that investigated unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP). An Irish man, Dr Colm Kelleher (67), ran that secret operation.
Over a Microsoft Teams chat from the Nevada desert, the AAWSAP (Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications Program) manager for the Defence Intelligence Agency, Dublin born scientist Dr Kelleher, described, what he believes, are the profound nature of his work.
“The idea that humans are the only life form in the universe is no longer true, that there is another intelligence very close to planet earth, is a shattering experience to internalise,” he said.
“This was not taught in Templeogue College. Suddenly you are faced with a reality that should not exist. There’s that phrase, ‘ontological shock.’ You make a shift psychologically and you never go back.
“For people who have experienced this, something changes and it becomes extremely important. People who have come face to face with this are very engaged. People who haven’t are on the side lines.
“In general, there is a psychological form of denial because if you admit this into your reality, there is a whole slew of things that are not true.
“That is why society is kind of split, as some people have been awakened to something that should not exist.”
An intelligence officer for the US National Geospatial Intelligence Agency, which is the primary source on earth for space threat analysis, made headlines in June when he said that:
“The non-human intelligence phenomenon is real. We are not alone. Retrievals are not limited to the United States.
“A vast array of our most sophisticated sensors, including space based platforms, have been utilized by different agencies, typically in triplicate, to observe and accurately identify the out of this world nature, performance and design of these anomalous machines, which are then determined not to be of earthly origin.”
Dr Kelleher’s journey to the upper echelons of Washington began after he graduated from Trinity College Dublin to go to Canada in 1984. He spent seven years there and moved to the States in 1991.
“I was born between Walkinstown and Terenure. I went to Templeogue College and then went to UCD to study Biochemistry and Chemistry. Then went to Trinity for my PhD.
“My background is in mainstream science. In 1996 I was working in an immunology research centre in Denver, Colorado, when I was looking at a science journal and I saw an ad recruiting scientists with a passion for the ‘origin and evolution of consciousness in the universe.’
“I took a leap into the un-known. Anomalies can lead to new doorways in science.”
Dr Kelleher picked up the phone and talked to Robert Bigelow, who was head of the US National Institute for Discovery Science (NIDS).
He joined the organization in August 1996. Meanwhile, there was a ranch in Utah where a family was experiencing suspected UAP activity.
“This rancher was saying, ‘Look, I see UFOs over my property every day. I have a herd of top end cattle, purebred and expensive. I have lost a dozen to cattle mutilations. I’m going out of business.’
“Within a month I was up there with a PhD physicist and a veterinary pathologist. Evidence suggested UFOs seemed to be in the same place at the same time as these cattle were being mutilated.
“We were playing cat and mouse with something that did not want to be hunted. Cattle kept on being mutilated and disappearing. It was some kind of intelligence, some sort of high technology that could move around easily and surreptitiously. It chose whether or not be photographed,” Dr Kelleher said.
Dr Kelleher described, what he considers, his first encounter on the ranch and the types of UAP he encountered with his team.
“It happened within a month. I was standing with this physicist at about 10 pm when this low-flying, fast-moving, very bright light came in over the ridge.
“Really fast, really low, I could see the structure behind the light. It was moving as fast as a jet fighter.
“It sped right across above our heads, then did a 180-degree turn, a U-turn directly above. Completely silent. It retraced its steps and vanished again beyond the ridge.”
Back in June, both NASA and the Pentagon revealed the existence of “metallic orb” UFOs which have been spotted all over the world.
They stressed that there was no evidence the UFOs are “extraterrestrial” in nature, but admitted that better data is needed to understand some encounters.
The report detailed movements that have defied explanation.
Dr Kelleher said he experienced similar UFO movements on the farm.
“There were multiple different types of orbs. Blue, yellow, white, red. All had different purposes.
“The blue were not to be messed with. They caused injuries to people and incinerated animals. They had profound negative, effects on people’s health. If you see a blue orb, run like hell.”
Dr Kelleher wrote a book about his work called ‘Hunt for the Skinwalker: Science Confronts the Unexplained at a Remote Ranch in Utah.’
The Dubliner studied with NIDS until 2004 and then worked in biotechnology for 5 years in San Francisco. He got a call regarding a new Government programme that was opening in 2008. It was top secret and was run by the Defence Intelligence Agency.
The focus was threat analysis for the UFO phenomenon.
“The official line from the Pentagon had always been ‘Nothing here folks, move on.’ The fact that the DIA was studying them underneath the radar was of tremendous interest. DIA provided 22 million in funding over two years.
“It required top secret clearances. All facilities had to be top secret, not a trivial exercise. One of the first cases we investigated was the ‘tic tac’ incident which years later featured in the New York Times article.
“F-18 fighters encountered multiple UFOs off the coast of San Diego. UFOs were coming in on ballistic missile trajectories, hurtling in at 80,000 feet, dropping down to just above the ocean.
“A carrier strike group was training- the Nimitz- with a bunch of destroyers, the most advanced radars on the planet. They tracked these things coming from space down to sea level.
“We contacted Washington, the guy running the operation for the DIA was James T Lacatski, the original rocket scientist. Our investigation remained top secret. We submitted our paper to the DIA in July 2009.
“That was eight years prior to the New York Times breaking that story. These UFOs were sighted by Top Gun pilots and tracked on multiple radar systems and infrared. There was no ambiguity. It was one of the most spectacular UFO engagements, probably in history.”
Dr Kelleher believes “the winds of change are blowing” as UAP information reaches members of the public.
“The Senate’s amendment mandates all UFO technology hidden with aerospace contractors to be revealed. The US Government will take possession of reversed engineered crashed technology.
“10 years ago official policy was ‘nothing to see here. People who report UFOs are drunk or delusional or mentally unstable.’ That was a standard part line until the story broke about our programme.”
Does Dr Kelleher know exactly what we are contending with?
“If I came down with an absolute ‘this is what it is’, I would not be telling the truth. The bottom line is we are dealing with very advanced technology. We are dealing with something that can manipulate human perception. It is something that can invade people’s lives and it is very deceptive.
“This phenomenon displays itself on its own terms. It is difficult to gather the evidence on this and it seems to be specifically engineered to sabotage the gathering of scientific evidence. There seems to be a fundamental deception there, I believe.
“During the 1950s, there seemed to be attempts made to start new religions. We have a lack of understanding. The UFO phenomenon is very far ahead of us and I think it always has been very far ahead of us and continues to be.
“The good news is that the Government has been taking this very seriously.”
Dr. Kelleher, Mr. Lacatski and award-winning journalist George Knapp have penned a book called ‘Inside the US Government Covert UFO Program: Initial Revelations‘.
The book contains their description of the secret UAP operation, focusing on the physics and engineering of UFO performance.
“How can they accelerate from 0 to Mach 15 in seconds? How can they come out of the water and into lower earth orbit without surface wings or obvious propulsion systems? Mostly silent. From an aerodynamic perspective; what is happening?
“Are they extremely advanced drones? Are they AI drones? The book is to explain to the public that we were going after this 100 pc in secret.
“James T. Lacatski got permission to write certain information from the Defence Office of Pre-publication Security regarding advanced technology and reversed engineering of these crashed vehicles. I am in the same position. I am in receipt of information I simply can’t talk about.
“These things are monitored. It’s not a slap on the wrist. You end up in prison for violation of security oath so we have to be very careful.“
Connacht astronomer, Dr Eamonn Ansbro, claimed 30 years ago that UFOs were orbiting Earth on specific orbital tracks, and captured alleged footage of a ‘tic tac’ UFO over Lough Key.
“I know Dr Ansbro’s material,” said Dr Kelleher. “From what I can see his premise is that there are a lot of probes on predictable orbits. Absolutely, ‘Tic tac’ cases are perfect examples of that. They came in on very similar ballistic missile trajectory orbits, coming in at 80,000 feet. Very, very predictable.
“The USS Princeton had them on radar day after day. On day 5, they launched the F-18s to vector them. So, Eamonn Ansbro’s theory has a lot of merit. Another good thing about his theory is that it is very testable. It can be tested against multiple databases. Not easy, but definitely doable.”
Is there any workable explanation for the triangle UFOs which have been photographed by US Navy personnel and engaged with by the Belgian Air Force?
“At NIDS we did a lengthy investigation of the black triangles. 150 cases. These things were one hundred yards long, low flying, huge, coming in over neighbourhoods and interstate highways and flying at tree-top level.
“Brightly lit and silent. After the first ten we thought it had to be an advanced tech Special Access Programme by the Air Force. But the pilots were taking enormous risks over populated neighbourhoods with experimental craft?
“After 100 cases we concluded they were not US Air Force. Pilots were violating all safety features. It was decided the phenomenon was mimicking SAPs. We created a hypothesis: ‘bi-directional mimicry’ where the phenomenon was reflecting back to us what our advanced SAPs were doing.
“They were not us. But it was so confusing. Low-flying, massive black triangles. One flew over Scott Air Force Base in Illinois on January 5, 2000. Four separate police precincts with multiple officers watched it move around. It was unbelievable.
“The Pentagon has had a cushy number covering this up for years. The cat is out of the bag. There’s no putting the genie back now.”
‘Project Morrigan’ is an initiative brought to Dáíl Eíreann by researchers Chris Gaffney and Dr Eamonn Ansbro to establish an Irish research body to scientifically study UAP over Ireland.
“I think that would be great,” said Dr Kelleher. “For the Irish Government to get out in front of the UAP issue and take the initiative of forming a scientific body (with a reporting mechanism for the Irish public to report UAPs) to study UAPs. This would be very innovative.
“If the initiative was serious, with a couple of internal champions and not just a PR exercise, I would consider getting involved,” Dr Kelleher added.
Chrissy Newton
The Debrief
Wed, 29 Nov 2023
Pickering Nuclear Generating Station
Senior military and intelligence personnel have consistently reported the presence of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) in proximity to locations linked to nuclear power, weaponry, and technology across the United States for the past 75 years.
However, the U.S. is not the only country in which unknown aerial objects have been observed, and sometimes close to sites of national security significance.
“Canadians report seeing UFOs in the sky at a rate of 3 times a day,” says Chris Rutkowski, a Canadian ufologist and media expert. “There are about 1,000 UFO reports filed in Canada every year, and the number remains high.”
However, amidst this extensive reporting of the phenomena, another question arises: where are the official Canadian records involving UAP observed near nuclear power facilities?
Now, The Canadian Constitution Foundation (CCF), a national and non-partisan charity with the mission to defend constitutionally protected rights and freedoms, is supporting a Canadian freelance investigative journalist, Daniel Otis, in his effort to appeal a decision made by Ontario Power Generation (OPG), involving the denial of access to records pertaining to UAP detected at or near nuclear power plants in Canada.
Daniel Otis’s UAP investigations, reporting on UAP activity, and social-political commentary on the topic have been extensively published in national outlets such as CTV News and Motherboard. Through his reports, Otis plays a vital role in enhancing Canadians’ understanding of how government agencies are addressing these enigmatic phenomena.
In support of his investigative work, Otis has submitted over 200 requests under federal and provincial freedom of information laws to various Canadian agencies, including the Department of National Defense, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, and the Royal Canadian Air Force. Historically, these agencies have nearly always provided the records requested with information that poses a security risk redacted.
“For more than two years, I have used freedom of information requests to uncover case files, procedures, and briefing material about unidentified objects and lights in Canadian airspace,” Otis says. “While this might seem outlandish at first, I have obtained thousands of pages of relevant material, including 70 years of reports from Canadian pilots, soldiers, and police officers.“
Last year, OPG turned down Otis’s inquiry under Ontario’s Freedom of Information and Privacy Protection Act (FIPPA) for the supply of records concerning Unidentified Aerial Phenomena identified near Ontario’s nuclear power plants.
Otis launched the request based on an anonymous tip he received. Even though the existence of records was acknowledged, OPG initially refused to provide the copies, insisting on an exemption within FIPPA. This exemption states that records need not be disclosed if their revelation could reasonably be expected to seriously threaten an individual’s safety or health.
On March 2, 2023, during a meeting of the House of Commons Standing Committee on Natural Resources, Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) officials were asked by Committee Vice-Chair and Member of Parliament Larry Maguire if the government shared any information it had on UAP or drone reports from nuclear power facilities throughout the country.
“The CNSC can report that there have been no reported drone intrusions or attempted intrusions at Canadian high-security nuclear facilities,” wrote Kathleen Heppell-Masys, Director General Directorate of Security and Safeguards, in a response on March 11.
She added that “All CNSC licensees, including operators of high-security sites such as nuclear power plants and Chalk River Laboratories, are required as conditions of their licenses and under NSC regulations to report on any attempted or actual breaches of security, or attempted or actual acts of sabotage at their sites. This requirement applies to any actual or attempted intrusion of the facilities by ‘drones’ including autonomous, semi-autonomous, and remotely piloted aircraft systems.”
“The excessive secrecy is absurd,” House of Parliament Member Larry Maguire told The Debrief. “It is my sincere hope the Chief Science Advisor’s Sky Canada Project will include specific recommendations on how information can be released into the public domain for further study and investigation.”
“By making information publicly available, it will help scientists and researchers analyze the data and cross-reference it with other open-source material. We also need to see a scientific plan and best practices the government could adopt,” Maguire said.
Maguire told The Debrief that he had made his own inquiries about UAP sightings near Canadian nuclear facilities, to which officials provided lackluster responses.
“When I originally asked questions about incidents near nuclear facilities at the Natural Resources Committee, it was clear the department did not have a plan on how to investigate occurrences. Even though the Deputy Minister, who is now the Clerk of the Privy Council, said they would be willing to work with their American counterparts, I have seen no information to suggest it is happening.”
“It should also be noted the department said they had no records of incidences, while OPG is now willing to go to great lengths not to comply with this access to information request.”
After Otis appealed the decision to Ontario’s Information and Privacy Commissioner (IPC), OPG raised several other dubious reasons that it cannot provide even redacted records. The reasons cited include the constitutional division of powers, the federal Nuclear Safety and Control Act, and other related regulations.
However, OPG’s interpretation of the law is incorrect, as illustrated by the decision of New Brunswick Power, which is governed by the same constitution and federal regime as OPG, to provide Otis with records of UAP sightings at or near its nuclear plant.
“How many UAPs are associated with nuclear sites? It’s actually hard to say,” Rutkowski told The Debrief.
“I was asked a few years ago for a list of UAP near Canadian nuclear sites and it was quite long. But the problem is how to define a nuclear site and what does ‘near’ or ‘over’ one mean?”
One example Rutkowski gives is his Canadian UFO Survey, which he says now has almost 25,000 reports in it spanning more than three decades. “If we search the database for a specific location, such as Pickering, where a nuclear energy generating station is located, we get more than 50 reports! So in one sense, UAP are definitely associated with nuclear sites.”
“Since Pickering is near large population centers and is on an airline flight path, someone in southern Ontario who sees a UAP in the direction of Pickering might only see a light in the general area, not really directly over the nuclear site,” Rutkowski says. “The same is likely true for Chalk River, Bruce Point, etc.
“So, it might also be that UAP are only incidentally associated with nuclear sites.”
Rutkowski says that he has been told of security officials at nuclear sites that have observed unusual aerial phenomena, although such reports “are not routinely reported to me or to civilian organizations so it’s hard to say what they might be. I’d have to say that from experience, many would turn out to be misidentified aircraft or astronomical objects.”
“Nevertheless, I think that Otis’s requests should be given due consideration and that he should have access to UAP reports filed by security personnel working a nuclear sites,” Rutkowski said.
“Ontario’s freedom of information law is clear that the public has a right to access information from public institutions and exemptions must be limited and specific,” says CCF counsel Josh Dehaas.
“Mr. Otis has been more than reasonable in his request,” Dehaas adds. “He simply wants those parts of the documents that are not exempt from disclosure so that he can do his job and inform the public about the UFOs that have been reported at or near OPG’s nuclear plants.”
Presently, Otis is urging Ontario’s Information and Privacy Commissioner to order and oversee the release of redacted records in this case.
“Ontario Power Generation, a multi-billion-dollar provincial Crown corporation, has put the weight of their legal team into fighting my request,” Otis said.
“By simply redacting and releasing records, we could achieve a reasonable outcome that protects sensitive personal and security-related information while providing important data that researchers and the public can use to help unravel the enduring mystery of sightings like these.”
Requests for a comment were sent to Ontario Power Generation by The Debrief, but no responses had been received from the company as of the time of publication.
Chrissy Newton is a PR professional and founder of VOCAB Communications. She hosts the Rebelliously Curious podcast, which can be found on The Debrief’s YouTube Channel. Follow her on X: @ChrissyNewton Or chrissynewton.com
A “secretive” office of the US spy agency has reportedly recovered nine “non-human craft”
“There’s at least nine vehicles. There were different circumstances for different ones,” one of the sources said. “It has to do with the physical condition they’re in. If it crashes, there’s a lot of damage done. Others, two of them, are completely intact.”
https://www.rt.com/news/588160-ufo-retrieved-cia-whistleblowers/
Nov 28, 2023
FILE PHOTO: Unidentified flying object, illustration. © Getty Images / KTSDesign / SCIENCE PHOTO LIBRARY
American spies have managed to recover at least nine potentially alien vehicles, two of them “completely intact,” the Daily Mail reported on Tuesday, citing three anonymous sources.
The sources, supposedly briefed on top secret operations, told the UK outlet that the main player in the retrievals has been the Office of Global Access (OGA), a branch of the CIA Science and Technology Directorate established in 2003.
“There’s at least nine vehicles. There were different circumstances for different ones,” one of the sources said. “It has to do with the physical condition they’re in. If it crashes, there’s a lot of damage done. Others, two of them, are completely intact.”
The CIA has a system to detect unidentified flying objects (UFO) “while they’re still cloaked” and helps special US military units salvage the wreckage if “non-human craft” land, crash, or are brought down, the source added.
Another anonymous source described the OGA’s role as “basically a facilitator” for US operatives to access areas where they would normally not be allowed.
“They are very clever at being able to get anywhere in the world they want to,” the second source said.
Most of OGA’s operations involve “stray nuclear weapons, downed satellites or adversaries’ technology,” according to the Mail, but some missions have involved retrieval of UFOs – or as the US government now prefers to call them, “Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena” (UAP).
Aliens are living among us – Stanford professor
“The task at hand is simply to get it into custody and protect the secrecy of it,” one source said. “The actual physical retrieval is by the military. But it’s not kept under military control, because they have to keep too many records. So they start moving it out fairly quickly into private hands.”
Two of the sources said that the OGA coordinates with Delta Force or SEAL teams working under the US Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC), or the Nuclear Emergency Support Team (NEST), to recover the potentially alien craft.
“We have nothing for you on this,” JSOC said in a written response to the British outlet. A NEST spokesperson said that the agency’s personnel “encounter materials from unknown origins on a regular basis,” but have “never encountered any material related to UAP.”
One of the sources described the CIA as the “portfolio manager” of the UFO “crash retrieval operation.” Recovered radioactive materials are sent to national laboratories run by the Department of Energy, while “aerospace-defense industry” contractors handle “other non-radioactive material – and intact craft,” the source claimed.
After three military and intelligence whistleblowers testified about the UFO retrieval program to US Congress in July, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer sponsored a bill that would require the government to disclose “recovered technologies of unknown origin and biological evidence of non-human intelligence.” This UAP Disclosure Act was adopted as part of the 2024 National Defense Authorization Act in September.
1) The US Federal Government has engaged in formal contracts and official agreements with evil ETs that are profoundly treasonous and which severely violate the human rights of Americans; hence, “Disclosure” would reveal this utterly odious treachery and turn the populace against the government.
(2) Much of the highly advanced UFO technology which has been reversed engineered over the years is being used for malevolent purposes, some even being used to further control and target the American people in quite nefarious ways.
(3) The Powers That Be who currently oversee the entire planetary civilization want all of humanity to believe that they are gods by virtue of their advanced technologies which have been given to them by the evil ETs; therefore, any revelations about UFO truth would immediately expose them as mere tools of EBEs from off-planetary civilizations who are far more intelligent and superior in terms of destructive weaponry.
(4) The Military Industrial Complex has a vested interest to never see those highly secret and sophisticated technologies ever revealed to the public because it gives them extraordinary power over the masses especially serving to distract the citizenry via UFO events which are mostly US military experiments using the reverse engineered tech.
(5) UFOs and Alien activity have been both witnessed and pointed out over millennia as evidenced by the archeological record and countless written accounts, so once the cover-up began, the costs associated with reversing it became more enormous and impractical by the year.
(6) Every POTUS going back to 1900 has participated in this massive coverup which would not only implicate them and their respective administrations in a highly premeditated criminal conspiracy, it would also expose the US government to a tremendous amount of legal liability and financial damages for untold deaths and injuries related particularly to the abuse of various weapon technologies.
According to a detailed report by the Daily Mail, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) of the United States has been engaged in the retrieval of unidentified flying objects (UFOs) for several decades. Sources familiar with these top-secret operations claim that since 2003, the CIA has collected at least nine non-human vehicles.
By yourNEWS Media Staff
Nov 29, 2023
A recent report reveals the CIA’s purported role in obtaining and transferring extraterrestrial vehicles to private entities, with claims of at least nine such vehicles since 2003.
According to a detailed report by the Daily Mail, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) of the United States has been engaged in the retrieval of unidentified flying objects (UFOs) for several decades. Sources familiar with these top-secret operations claim that since 2003, the CIA has collected at least nine non-human vehicles.
The activities are reportedly overseen by the CIA’s Office of Global Access (OGA), a name that suggests the office’s global reach or its role in granting outsiders access to various locations. These operations have been described by one source as involving different circumstances depending on the physical condition of the retrieved vehicles. “There’s at least nine vehicles. There were different circumstances for different ones. It has to do with the physical condition they’re in. If it crashes, there’s a lot of damage done. Others, two of them, are completely intact,” the source stated.
The CIA is also reported to possess technology capable of detecting UFOs while they remain cloaked, enabling the U.S. military to locate and retrieve these invisible aircraft whether they land or crash. These retrieval operations reportedly extend to restricted areas, including behind enemy lines.
Furthermore, the process of retrieval is initially carried out by the military. However, the control of these objects is not maintained under military jurisdiction. “The actual physical retrieval is by the military. But it’s not kept under military control because they have to keep too many records. So they start moving it out fairly quickly into private hands,” detailed one source. This aspect of transferring recovered UFOs to private parties raises concerns about the potential knowledge and technologies that could be gleaned from reverse engineering these vehicles.
The authors of the Daily Mail article have expanded on their findings in a podcast, providing further insights into these remarkable claims.
As nuts as it sounds, that was a real subject of conversation, even if it sounds like something out of Star Trek: First Contact. Once you realise the phenomenon’s real, then you realise we’ve recovered artifacts and biologics, or dead pilots if you will, even though it’s creepy to even think about that in your worldview… that is something the President and his cabinet need to disclose … in a controlled manner.”
Rank Chung
news.com.au
Thu, 23 Nov 2023
UFO whistleblower David Grusch on the Joe Rogan podcast
A former US intelligence officer turned UFO whistleblower claims the government has recovered remains of multiple different types of non-human biological “entities” from crashed craft — and hinted that there may have been “interactions” with living beings.
David Grusch, an Air Force veteran and former member of the National Geospatial Intelligence Agency (NGA) and the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO), appeared on The Joe Rogan Experience podcast on Tuesday and made a series of sensational new claims.
Asked by Rogan how many biological entities he was talking about, Mr Grusch said there was “a variety, and we have a … certain number of different things”.
“But the total numbers of what’s interacting with us on earth, I mean nobody knows that,” he said.
“I talk to people who are familiar with the biological analysis and everything. So we have some idea, not a complete picture because it’s like, you know, you’re looking at it, it’s like, well I don’t even understand the physiology at all, it’s like what the heck, it’s way different.”
Mr Grusch, who was a representative of the NRO to the Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) Task Force and co-lead for UAP analysis at the NGA, first went public in June claiming the US government had secretly retrieved craft of non-human origin and alien bodies — and that he had turned over “proof” of the alleged covert program to Congress and the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community (ICIG) as part of a whistleblower complaint.
While he admitted he had not seen first-hand evidence of the alleged extraterrestrial craft or bodies, Mr. Grusch said he had spoken at length with dozens of senior intelligence and military officials who had allegedly come forward to him.
Comment: During the interview, Grusch said that he does have some first-hand knowledge, but has not yet been cleared to talk about it.
The following month, Mr. Grusch appeared at a US congressional UFO hearing alongside Ryan Graves, a former US Navy pilot and executive director of Americans for Safe Aerospace, and David Fravor, a former high-ranking US Navy fighter pilot who claimed to have chased a “Tic Tac”-shaped UFO off the coast of San Diego in 2004.
Mr Grusch testified that he “absolutely” believes the government is in possession of UAPs as well as remains of their non-human operators.
He has claimed the government is in possession of “double-digit” numbers of crashed craft, but cannot disclose the exact number.
Mr. Grusch told Rogan the number of retrieved bodies was “up there as well, just like with the retrievals”.
On the question of where they came from, he said, “Nobody I talked to espoused any specific origin to me. We may know that but I’m not aware of anything.”
Mr. Grusch said officials inside the government “did use the term extraterrestrial” but that was only “a possible origin”.
But the Schumer Amendment — bipartisan legislation put forward by the Senate in July that would force the US government to disclose its UFO secrets — “specifically uses ‘non-human intelligence’, NHI, very deliberately because we want to catch everything, because what if some of this stuff is not ET and they’re going to use that as an escape clause”, Mr. Grusch said.
Asked by Rogan whether there had been any “interactions” with these beings, Mr. Grusch said interactions “was a sensitive subject that my interview subjects did not want to get into”.
“There was water cooler talk with some people I talked to on the program,” he said.
“They’re like, ‘Hey bro guess what I overheard in some weird meeting.’ The problem with that is it’s secondary information … Those people who physically were there, were on the program, who did the thing, I brought to the Inspector General. There was some water cooler talk about that sort of thing. But I don’t even want to get into it because … there were some details provided to me but it’s secondary and I don’t know if that’s the telephone game and I don’t know if it was hyperbolised in any way in the break room so to speak.”
Pressed on whether he knew when these rumoured interactions first took place, Mr. Grusch said “Some specific events were mentioned to me” some of which went “pretty far back — it’s pretty weird”.
“The interactions stuff, it’s a sensitive area,” he said.
“There were multiple very senior people that were concerned about talking about that kind of stuff with me. As nuts as it sounds, that was a real subject of conversation, even if it sounds like something out of Star Trek: First Contact. Once you realise the phenomenon’s real, then you realise we’ve recovered artifacts and biologics, or dead pilots if you will, even though it’s creepy to even think about that in your worldview… that is something the President and his cabinet need to disclose … in a controlled manner.”
He also strongly hinted that he had spoken with at least one US President about the phenomenon, which he said had been going on for “thousands of years”.
“Are we alone? Well the answer is we’re not alone,” he said.
“And I know that with 100 per cent certainty, which as an intel officer you never say 100 per cent. But all things pointed towards, based on the people I talked to like [former Nevada Senator] Harry Reid, and I use him as an example but I talked to the highest of the high people you could possibly talk to, if you catch my drift.”
He added, “So unless all of them are lying and they’re covering up something else — which I don’t even know what it would be at this point — because the phenomenon is real, it’s been going on for thousands of years, people have been seeing strange things, and not everybody’s mass hallucinating.”
Earlier this month, the Pentagon’s UFO chief announced he would step down in December after saying that several reported sightings of objects flying through the sky over the US are either the work of foreign nations or aliens, warning that the latter would be the preferred scenario.
Dr Sean Kirkpatrick, head of the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO), announced his plans to leave after heading the department for 18 months.
After investigating more than 800 cases during his brief stint as director, Dr Kirkpatrick warned of the presence of UFOs, and although there has yet to be any hard evidence of aliens, he said the alternative was much more frightening.
“If we don’t prove it’s aliens, then what we’re finding is evidence of other people doing stuff in our backyard,” he told Politico. “And that’s not good.”
The office, which was established last year, has made headlines over its investigations into UFO sightings reported by military pilots and for helping detect the Chinese surveillance balloons flying over the US.
Dr Kirkpatrick himself made headlines in June when he slammed Mr Grusch. Despite being open to the idea of aliens among us, Dr Kirkpatrick testified before congress that there was “no credible evidence thus far of extraterrestrial activity” or “off-world technology”.
He criticised Mr Grusch’s claims as “extremely unethical and immoral”, noting that the whistleblower refused multiple requests to speak with the AARO.
Comment: Here’s the full interview. Hold on to your hat:
https://open.spotify.com/embed/episode/6D6otpHwnaAc86SS1M8yHm/video?utm_source=generator
Nov 13, 2023
Chimauchem Nwosu
Despite allegations of indifference toward UFO whistleblower concerns, Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick actively pursued investigations of over 30 UFO occurrences, pioneered the “Historical Record Report” on UFOs, and engaged in significant scientific cooperation with NASA and the European Space Agency.
Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick, the retiring head of the Pentagon’s All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) and a noted laser and materials physicist, has been a prominent figure in unidentified flying object (UFO) matters. During his 18-month tenure as the first director of this office, his beliefs in the possibility of extraterrestrial life, albeit with a skeptical lens, have sparked both interest and controversy.
In an interview with news sources, Kirkpatrick expressed cautious optimism about proving the existence of life beyond Earth, potentially on Mars or elsewhere in the universe. He acknowledges the scientific consensus on the likelihood of life in the vast cosmos. However, he maintains that the chances of such life being intelligent, aware of Earth, and having visited here, especially in the United States, are minimal.
https://t.me/geopolitics_live/2764?embed=1
Under his leadership, the AARO has fostered objective and scientifically grounded discussions with organizations like NASA and the European Space Agency. Despite facing accusations of creating an “atmosphere of disinterest” among some UFO whistleblowers, Kirkpatrick revealed that over 30 cases brought to him were investigated. He noted that while some whistleblowers had positive experiences, there were suggestions of higher authorities impeding AARO’s endeavors.
The retiring UFO chief expressed satisfaction with his achievements, including setting in motion enduring tasks like the “Historical Record Report” on UFOs, due for Congress in June 2024. He also introduced a new secure reporting system for investigating claims of covert and potentially illicit US government UFO programs, specifically for individuals with direct knowledge of such activities dating back to 1945.
US State of Maryland Listed as Hotbed for UFO Sightings
Since December 2017, following news reports, there has been a shift in how the term UFO is approached. It is now more cautiously referred to as Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP). At a recent press conference, Dr. Kirkpatrick emphasized that no collaboration with foreign adversaries on UAP data had occurred due to national security concerns. However, he also expressed concern over indicators of foreign involvement in certain UAP cases that are currently under thorough investigation.
In the past year, a 22-page classified report and historical accounts have brought to light unresolved sightings of “orbs” on drone cameras, some dating back to World War II. While organizations like Bellingcat propose mundane explanations, in a publication, Kirkpatrick and Harvard physicist Dr. Avi Loeb ponder the possibility of these being alien probes. Despite the predominance of theories attributing these phenomena to foreign technology, the historical evidence since World War II, including German anti-radar devices, highlights the diversity and complexity of these phenomena.
The article is below the video.
Tales from the Conspiratum 
