Archives
All posts for the day September 27th, 2023
Sept 27, 2023
https://x.com/MaxBlumenthal/status/1707068654783721791?s=20
After serving as one of Hitler’s top Ukrainian propagandists in occupied Poland, Michael Chomiak joined thousands of Nazi collaborators on the ratline to Canada during the 1950s.
Following Chomiak’s death in 1984, his granddaughter, Chrystia Freeland, followed in his footsteps as a reporter for various Ukrainian nationalist publications.
Freeland was an early contributor to the Encyclopedia of Ukraine, which was edited by her grandfather’s former boss in Poland, the Nazi collaborator and ethnic cleansing advocate Volodymyr Kubijovyč. Next, she took a staff position at the Edmonton-based Ukrainian News, where Chomiak had served as editor.
A 1988 edition of Ukrainian News featured an article co-authored by Freeland, followed by an ad for a book called “Fighting for Freedom” which glorified the Ukrainian Waffen-SS Galician division.
During Freeland’s time as an exchange student in Lviv, Ukraine, she laid the foundations for journalistic success. From behind cover as a Russian literature major at Harvard University, Freeland collaborated with local regime change activists while feeding anti-Soviet narratives to international media bigwigs.
“Countless ‘tendentious’ news stories about life in the Soviet Union, especially for its non-Russian citizens, had her fingerprints as Ms. Freeland set about making a name for herself in journalistic circles with an eye to her future career prospects,” the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) reported.
Citing KGB files, the CBC described Freeland as a de facto intelligence agent: “The student causing so many headaches clearly loathed the Soviet Union, but she knew its laws inside and out – and how to use them to her advantage. She skillfully hid her actions, avoided surveillance (and shared that knowledge with her Ukrainian contacts) and expertly trafficked in ‘misinformation.’”
In 1989, Soviet security agents rescinded Freeland’s visa when they caught her smuggling “a veritable how-to guide for running an election” into the country for Ukrainian nationalist candidates.
She quickly transitioned back to journalism, landing gigs in post-Soviet Moscow for the Financial Times and Economist, and eventually rising to global editor-at-large of Reuters – the UK-based media giant which today functions as a cutout for British intelligence operations against Russia. When Freeland won a seat as a Liberal member of Canada’s parliament in 2013, she established her most powerful platform yet to agitate for regime change in Russia.
Milking her journalistic connections, she published op-eds in top legacy papers like the New York Times urging militant support from Western capitals for Ukraine’s so-called “Revolution of Dignity,” which saw the violent removal of a democratically elected president and his replacement with a nationalist, pro-NATO government in 2014.
Weeks after she was appointed in January 2017 as Foreign Minister – a post she predictably exploited to thunder for sanctions on Russia and arms shipments to Ukraine – her grandfather’s role as a Nazi propagandist in occupied Poland became the subject of a raft of reports in the alternative press.
The Trudeau government responded to the factual reports by accusing Russia of waging a campaign of cyber-warfare. “The situation is obviously one where we need to be alert. And that is why the Prime Minister has, among other things, encouraged a complete re-examination of our cyber security systems,” Public Safety Minister Ralph Goodale declared.
Yet few, if any, of the outlets responsible for excavating Chomiak’s history had any connection to Russia’s government. Among the first to expose his collaborationism was Consortium News, an independent, US-based media organization.
For her part, Freeland deployed a spokesperson to lie to the public, flatly denying that “the minister’s grandfather was a Nazi collaborator.”
When Canadian media quoted several Russian diplomats about the allegations, Freeland promptly ordered their deportation, accusing them of exploiting their diplomatic status “to interfere in our democracy.”
By this time, however, her family secrets had tumbled out of the attic and onto the pages of mainstream Canadian media. On March 7, 2017, the Globe and Mail reported on a 1996 article in the Journal of Ukrainian Studies confirming that Freeland’s grandfather had indeed been a Nazi propagandist and that his writing helped fuel the Jewish genocide. The article was authored by Freeland’s uncle, John-Paul Himka, who thanked his niece in its preface for helping him with “problems and clarifications.”
“Freeland knew for more than two decades that her maternal Ukrainian grandfather was the chief editor of a Nazi newspaper in occupied Poland that vilified Jews during the Second World War,” the Globe and Mail noted.
After being caught on camera this September clapping with unrestrained zeal alongside hundreds of peers for a Ukrainian veteran of Hitler’s SS death squads, Freeland once again invoked her authority to scrub the incident from the record.
Three days after the embarrassing scene, Freeland was back on the floor of parliament, nodding in approval as Liberal House leader Karina Gould introduced a resolution to strike “from the appendix of the House of Commons debates” and from “any House multimedia recording” the recognition made by Speaker Anthony Rota of Yaroslav Hunka.
There’s no way to put a good face on it: Paris has been unceremoniously dumped by Niger
https://www.rt.com/news/583594-macron-niger-france-failure/
© Ludovic MARIN / AFP
In a wide-ranging interview last weekend that aired as much of France was conveniently glued to the Paris Saint Germain vs. Olympique Marseille football match, President Emmanuel Macron was asked about his recent bad breakup. He was only too happy to spill all his feelings about the relationship like he was talking with Oprah Winfrey rather than TV news anchors.
He said that France was ending its military cooperation with Niger and repatriating France’s ambassador to Niamey and around 1,500 troops. It’s about time since he was already dumped a month ago and Niger has been threatening to get France’s tent off its lawn.
France’s military presence in some of its former African colonies, including Niger, was to combat terrorism, he said, adding that without France’s presence, “most of these countries would have already fallen prey to territorial caliphates and jihadists.”
Indeed, thank goodness for France, whose anti-terrorist mission was such a resounding success that the UN’s own peace operations advised the Security Council in May 2023 that “insecurity in the tri-border area of Burkina Faso, Mali and Niger continues to grow.” ‘Rampant jihadists are spreading chaos and misery in the Sahel’, a headline in The Economist read in April, while the Wilson Center reported that same month that “The Sahel Now Accounts for 43% of Global Terrorism Deaths.” All of that was going on right under France’s nose.
France to withdraw from Niger – Macron
Rather than Macron’s suggestion that France has helped prevent these nations from becoming caliphates, there’s actually stronger evidence to suggest that’s precisely the direction they were heading under French oversight. If Macron is talking about Boko Haram, then the solution was not to invade and destabilize Libya, because Boko Haram has since benefited from looted Libyan weapons and, in 2016, Washington officials were warning of Boko Haram fighters joining up with ISIS in Libya. That’s two years after France started Operation Barkhane, its effort to combat Islamist insurgents in the Sahel. A lot of good that was doing. The French must have been imposing the same brand of modern-day French discipline that results in kids across France periodically acting out over some issue du jour and smashing up cities.
Either Macron is caught in an illusion or he thinks that the French and African people are – or that they are at least clueless enough to think that things were looking up for these countries right up until Paris was sent packing. If that was the case – if the lives of the locals were truly improving – then where are the masses in the streets protesting in opposition to France’s withdrawal?
Macron was also careful to stress that France was only there at the behest of these countries. But what if they had dared to say ‘non’, particularly in the wake of the chilling effect of the French-led NATO intervention and coup d’état in Libya that led to the death of its leader, Muammar Gaddafi, in 2011? With these Francophone African nations serving as Paris’ stockrooms for everything from critical uranium that powers its nuclear plants to black gold that fuels French industry, is it any wonder that the leaders of these countries, until now, just happen to be excessively accommodating to these French interests – lest they find themselves ‘Gaddafi’d’.
But already, with the changes in management of these countries, the French press and industry representatives have been actively wondering about the fate of French companies in the Sahel. Paris has long maintained enough control to at least keep the resources flowing. But if France ever had any concern for the locals beyond that, it would have shown it by now.
But Macron didn’t stop there with the spin. “We are not responsible for the political life of these countries,” he said. In that case, why is France constantly trying to dictate to African nations who they should or shouldn’t be partners with, most recently pressuring them to ditch Russia and China?
And why did Macron push for African countries, uninterested in playing the West’s anti-Russian sanctions game, to take a side in the Ukraine conflict during a visit to Cameroon over the summer, if he believed in staying out of African political life? And if France is so hands-off with Africa’s internal affairs, why did Burkina Faso just a few days ago accuse Paris of blocking military supplies to the landlocked country when it’s supposed to be fighting the same insurgencies that Paris claims it had been there to help quash?
Or why did Macron attempt to revamp his African strategy in February by rebranding French military bases as ‘academies’, and having a European team collaborate with ‘civil society’ players in Africa? Nothing says non-interference like funding NGOs inside foreign countries.
Ties with Russia ‘not your business,’ African state’s president tells Macron
“We’re not there to participate in coup d’états or to interfere,” Macron said. That may be true when Paris likes the guy in charge and wants him to stay there to protect French interests. Otherwise, it’s pressure on France’s ECOWAS (Economic Community of West African States) pals to do a counter-coup, as Macron appeared to suggest during a speech to French ambassadors. “If ECOWAS abandons [Nigerien] President Bazoum, I think that all the presidents of the region are more or less aware of the fate that will be reserved for them,” Macron declared, as president of the country that has literally overthrown African leaders in the past.
Macron didn’t have anything to say about the role of Paris’ Washington allies, who trained the Nigerien coup leaders both in-country and in the US, and whose troops not only remain in Niger but have resumed intelligence and reconnaissance missions, according to the Pentagon earlier this month.
While Macron seethes at Russia for replacing France, how does he reconcile the fact that Moscow hasn’t also ‘replaced’ Washington? Is he going to accuse Moscow and Washington of colluding now, too? Maybe these African countries haven’t yet figured out exactly what they want, and with whom, although Burkina Faso, Mali, and Niger have already teamed up for their own anti-terrorism missions in a mutual defense pact. That, too, is being ‘blamed’ on Russia. In any case, sticking to the same broken relationship with Paris clearly wasn’t working.
And it looks like Macron, having been dumped, is caught somewhere between the denial and acceptance stages of grief.
About 45% of people who have an NDE report an out-of-body experience. When this happens, their consciousness separates from their physical body, usually hovering above the body.
Kelly Burch
Insider
Tue, 29 Aug 2023
© Reuters
This as-told-to essay is based on a conversation with Jeffrey Long. It has been edited for length and clarity.
Thirty-seven years ago I was an oncologist resident, learning about how best to treat cancer using radiation. These were the pre-internet days, so I did my research in the library. One day, I was flipping through a large volume of the Journal of the American Medical Association when I came across an article describing near-death experiences.
It stopped me in my tracks. All my medical training told me you were either alive or dead. There was no in-between. But suddenly, I was reading from a cardiologist describing patients who had died and then came back to life, reporting very distinct, almost unbelievable experiences.
From that moment, I was fascinated with near-death experiences or NDEs. I define a near-death experience as someone who is either comatose or clinically dead, without a heartbeat, having a lucid experience where they see, hear, feel emotions, and interact with other beings. Learning more about these experiences has fundamentally changed my view of the universe.
Near-death experiences have common threads
When I finished my residency, I started the Near-Death Experience Research Foundation. I started collecting stories from people who had NDEs and evaluating them with the mind of a scientist and doctor. I made opinions based on evidence and came into this as a skeptic. But in the face of overwhelming evidence, I’ve come to believe there’s certainly an afterlife.
No two NDEs are the same. But as I studied thousands of them, I saw a consistent pattern of events emerging in a predictable order. About 45% of people who have an NDE report an out-of-body experience. When this happens, their consciousness separates from their physical body, usually hovering above the body. The person can see and hear what’s happening around them, which usually includes frantic attempts to revive them. One woman even reported a doctor throwing a tool on the floor when he picked up the wrong one — something the doctor later confirmed.
After the out-of-body experience, people say they’re transported into another realm. Many pass through a tunnel and experience a bright light. Then, they’re greeted by deceased loved ones, including pets, who are in the prime of their lives. Most people report an overwhelming sense of love and peace. They feel like this other realm is their real home.
I haven’t found any scientific explanation for these experiences
These experiences may sound cliché: the bright light, the tunnel, the loved ones. But over twenty-five years of studying NDEs, I’ve come to believe that these descriptions have become cultural tropes because they’re true. I even worked with a group of children under five who had NDEs. They reported the same experiences that adults did — and at that age, you’re unlikely to have heard about bright lights or tunnels after you die.
Other people report seemingly unbelievable events, which we can later confirm. One woman lost consciousness while riding her horse on a trail. Her body stayed on the trail while her consciousness traveled with her horse as he galloped back to the barn. Later, she was able to describe exactly what happened at the barn because she had seen it despite her body not being there. Others who hadn’t spoken to her confirmed her account.
I’m a medical doctor. I’ve read brain research and considered every possible explanation for NDEs. The bottom line is that none of them hold water. There isn’t even a remotely plausible physical explanation for this phenomenon.
I’ve also studied fear-death experiences, like near-miss car accidents
I take a particular definition for NDEs. The person must be unconscious. But there’s another type of phenomenon that fascinates me too: what I call “fear-death experiences.”
These are situations when you feel your life is in imminent danger. It might be a near-miss car accident or a sudden fall. These people generally don’t experience the tunnel and light, but they often report their life “flashing before their eyes.”
While some people with NDEs report these life reviews, they’re more common with fear-death experiences. People even recall events from toddlerhood that they can’t consciously remember but that we can later confirm by talking with family members and others.
Studying NDEs has made me a better cancer doctor
While I’m passionate about NDEs, my day job still revolves around helping patients fight cancer. I don’t tell my patients about my NDE research. And yet, my work with NDEs has made me a more compassionate and loving doctor.
I’m able to help my patients face life-threatening diseases with increased courage and passion. My goal is to help them have more healthy days here on Earth. But I firmly believe that if and when they pass, they will be at peace.
Read the original article on Insider
Dude, Vladimir Putin didn’t invite a Nazi to parliament, your government did.
To recap: Trudeau in a clear act of official disinformation smeared thousands of Canadian protesters as Nazis last year with context-twisting descriptions of a few decidedly un-representative photos.
https://www.blacklistednews.com/article/85360/justin-trudeaus-nazi-hot-take-flexibility.html
SOURCE: MATT TAIBBI VIA RACKET NEWS
Let me get this straight:
A year and a half ago, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau denounced a Jewish member of parliament named Melissa Lantsman for standing with “people who wave swastikas.” Lantsman had criticized Trudeau for fanning “the flames of an unjustified national emergency” in response to the “Freedom Convoy” trucker protests. The “swastikas” Trudeau referenced were, as even Snopes conceded, virtually all “pictured on signs as a way of mocking and protesting government restrictions,” comme ça:
By saying Lantsman stood with “people who wave swastikas,” in other words, Trudeau really meant she was standing with “people who called me a Nazi.” He declined to apologize, which of course is his prerogative.
This week, both Trudeau and House of Commons Speaker Anthony Rota are under fire after Rota invited, and Trudeau applauded, a 98-year-old former soldier from the 14th Waffen-SS Grenadier Division named Yaroslav Hunka to attend an address by Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky. Rota praised Hunka as a “Canadian hero” from his time fighting the Soviets in World War II when, not that it matters, they were allies to the United States and Canada. Leaving the elderly Hunka out of this for the moment, these politicians could easily have turned up the man’s blogs about joining Hitler’s army, making the applause scene at least approach the max on the cringe scale:
Amid the subsequent outcry, Trudeau squeaked out a handful of sentences that collectively gave off least a faint aroma of apology, though he personally didn’t apologize for anything, and invoked “mistakes were made” phrasing:
It’s extremely upsetting that this happened. The Speaker has acknowledged his mistake and has apologized… This is something that is deeply embarrassing to the Parliament of Canada and by extension to all Canadians… I think particularly of Jewish MPs and all members of the Jewish community, celebrating, um, commemorating Yom Kippur today.
If he’d stopped there, it would have been a merely gross performance. He didn’t, jumping straight from “Yom Kippur today” to:
I think it’s going to be really important that all of us push back against Russian propaganda, Russian disinformation, and continue our steadfast and unequivocal support for Ukraine, as we did last week with announcing further measures to stand with Ukraine in Russia’s illegal war against it.
To recap: Trudeau in a clear act of official disinformation smeared thousands of Canadian protesters as Nazis last year with context-twisting descriptions of a few decidedly un-representative photos. Now, after the Speaker of the House of Commons invited an ex-Nazi to parliament in a planned political act that had to be somewhat representative of the thinking of Trudeau’s Liberal government, the Prime Minister is complaining about “Russian disinformation,” as if that were to blame for this optics Hindenburg. As the CBC put it:
Trudeau warned that this event may fuel Russian propaganda. Russian President Vladimir Putin has claimed the Ukraine conflict is about rooting out Nazis.
Dude, Vladimir Putin didn’t invite a Nazi to parliament, your government did. Do Davosketeers like Trudeau have anything inside, like shame or their own thoughts, or are they just manicured readers of talking points? Sheesh. It’s almost funny, how repugnant these people are.
This is the same Jimmy Kimmel who joked in his show’s fall premiere in 2021 that hospitals shouldn’t treat people who used Ivermectin to treat COVID-19, buying into the media’s lies that the drug was horse medicine unsuitable for human usage.
On that occasion, he referenced a statement by Dr. Anthony Fauci that ICUs were filling up and hospitals would have to make “tough choices.”
Kimmel said: “That choice doesn’t seem so tough to me. Vaccinated person having a heart attack? Yes, come right in. We’ll take care of you. Unvaccinated guy who gobbled horse goo? Rest in peace, wheezy.”
https://www.newstarget.com/2023-09-26-jimmy-kimmel-cancels-show-after-contracting-covid.html
Sep 26, 2023
Comedian Jimmy Kimmel has canceled his upcoming live Strike Force Three show after contracting Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19).
He was scheduled to appear at the MGM in Las Vegas to record a live episode of the podcast with Stephen Colbert and Jimmy Fallon. The comedians have been hosting the podcast during the Writer’s Guild of America strike, along with late-night hosts John Oliver and Seth Meyers, with proceeds going toward covering the costs of their crews as they remain out of work.
“Well, Las Vegas, I got COVID, and sadly, we need to cancel this weekend’s Strike Force Three show. I could never live with myself if I got my hometown friends sick.”
Of course, it’s likely that his “hometown friends,” like him, are all vaccinated, so he is essentially acknowledging that the jab he mercilessly mocked people for avoiding is not effective at preventing the disease in the first place, something that we are seeing more evidence of every day.
This is the same Jimmy Kimmel who joked in his show’s fall premiere in 2021 that hospitals shouldn’t treat people who used Ivermectin to treat COVID-19, buying into the media’s lies that the drug was horse medicine unsuitable for human usage.
On that occasion, he referenced a statement by Dr. Anthony Fauci that ICUs were filling up and hospitals would have to make “tough choices.”
Kimmel said: “That choice doesn’t seem so tough to me. Vaccinated person having a heart attack? Yes, come right in. We’ll take care of you. Unvaccinated guy who gobbled horse goo? Rest in peace, wheezy.”
Since he is such a fan of Dr. Fauci, perhaps he could have hosted the show anyway and worn a mask. After all, if you believe Fauci, masks can stop the disease from spreading.
Kimmel is never called out on hypocrisy, however, because he is revered by the mainstream media for his brazen attacks on conservatives, who are largely the target of the jokes on his show. He has even gone so far as to compare the state of Florida under Governor Ron DeSantis to North Korea.
Kimmel’s past includes being a host of The Man Show, a program in which male comics made fun of women that ended with girls in bikinis jumping on trampolines, something the woke left would never stand for today.
Likewise, he has never been called out for the homophobic slurs he used against Fox News’ Sean Hannity or the fact that he wore blackface on several occasions during The Man Show to impersonate Oprah Winfrey and Karl Malone. This sort of thing would be enough for the woke left to call for other celebrities to be cancelled, but they’re willing to look the other way because he’s all too happy to push the left’s liberal agenda and mock conservatives every chance he gets.
High-profile COVID cancellations could be part of a vaccine scare tactic
He’s not the only entertainer to contract the virus recently. Sherri Shepherd cancelled tapings of her daytime talk show this week after testing positive for the virus, while Steve Martin announced that he would need to cancel shows in Las Vegas due to the virus as well.
“Unfortunately, our sold-out shows at the Wynn in Las Vegas this Friday and Saturday have to be postponed because of rampant COVID in our crew and one other essential guy,” Martin announced on X.
Why are we suddenly seeing so many high-profile COVID cancellations lately? It wouldn’t be surprising if it’s all part of a concerted effort to scare Americans into lining up for their next batch of boosters.
Sources for this article include:
https://www.naturalnews.com/2023-09-26-leaked-pfizer-data-deagels-2025-depopulation-prediction.html
Sept 26, 2023
A controversial forecast by Deagel, a global intelligence and consulting firm, recently gained attention for its startling prediction of a significant depopulation event by 2025. While initially dismissed as a speculative estimation, current events and emerging trends have led many to question whether there may be more to Deagel’s forecast than meets the eye.
(Article republished from Expose-News.com)
Recent reports from the Governments of the USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the UK, and various European countries have brought forth troubling revelations, among which is confirmation of a staggering number of excess deaths, reaching over two million since the mass roll-out of Covid-19 injections.
A troubling 120,000 excess deaths have also been recorded among the USA’s infants, children and young adults as of week 40 of 2022, and a curious rise in excess deaths among children across Europe has been recorded ever since the European Medicines Agency (EMA) extended the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the Pfizer Covid-19 injection to children in the middle of 2021.
With further Government figures confirming mortality rates are highest among the vaccinated in every single age group per 100,000 population, serious questions are now being raised about the accuracy and potential truth behind Deagel’s apocalyptic depopulation predictions.
What is Deagel?
The Deagel corporation is a minor branch of US military intelligence, one of the many secretive organizations which collect data for high-level decision-making purposes and prepares confidential briefing documents for agencies like the National Security Agency, the United Nations, and the World Bank.
It is known to have contributed to a Stratfor report on North Korea. With this kind of pedigree, Deagel should be seen as a legitimate player in the intelligence community and not merely a disinformation asset.
This means its population predictions for 2025, as well as its industrial output predictions on a nation-by-nation basis, are not mere fantasy but instead based on strategic assumptions which are shared and well understood by other players in the intelligence community.
What has Deagel Predicted?
Deagel.com’s [infamous] 2025 forecast was removed from their website sometime in 2020. However, thanks to the Wayback Machine / Internet Archive, we are able to view the original predictions before discovered by critical thinkers.
Deagel predicted in 2020 that the United Kingdom would see its population decline by 77.1% by the year 2025.
Deagel predicted in 2020 that the United States would see its population decline by 68.5 % by the year 2025.
Deagel predicted in 2020 that Germany would see its population decline by 65.1% by the year 2025.
Deagel predicted in 2020 that Australia would see its population decline by 34.6% by the year 2025.
While also predicting a huge decline among many other Western countries.
A full list of Deagel’s original apocalyptic depopulation predictions can be viewed here.
Sadly, current events suggest the depopulation figures were not just estimations.
Government Reports: Unveiling Excess Deaths
Official reports from multiple Governments across the globe have sounded the alarm bells by documenting an unprecedented number of excess deaths since the widespread administration of Covid-19 injections.
Official figures provided to EuroMOMO by the UK Government and 26 other Governments of counties across Europe reveal that most of the continent suffered 375,253 excess deaths in 2021 and 404,6000 excess deaths in 2022.
This equates to 779,853 excess deaths over the two years. The figures do not include Ukraine so cannot be blamed on the ongoing war.
Australia suffered 11,068 excess deaths in 2021 and then a shocking 22,730 excess deaths by week 38 of 2022. This is in stark contrast to 2020, when only 1,306 excess deaths were recorded at the height of the Covid pandemic and prior to the rollout of the Covid injections.
This means Australia suffered a shocking 1,640% increase in excess deaths in just 39 weeks throughout 2022 compared to 53 weeks throughout 2020.
New Zealand suffered 2,169 excess deaths in 2021 and then a shocking 5,286 excess deaths by week 49 of 2022. These are shocking figures for the small island with an estimated population of 5 million people.
Especially when compared to 2020, when no excess deaths were suffered and 160 fewer deaths were actually recorded than expected at the height of the Covid pandemic and prior to the rollout of the Covid injections.
This means New Zealand suffered a shocking 3,404% increase in excess deaths in 49 weeks throughout 2022 compared to 53 weeks throughout 2020.
In Canada, the situation is similarly concerning.
The country suffered 35,318 excess deaths in 2021 and then 25,333 excess deaths by week 34 of 2022. This compares to 31,042 excess deaths in 2020 by week 53.
However, when looking at the figures up to week 34 in both 2020 and 2021, it becomes clear that 2022 has in fact been the worst year for excess deaths by far.
By week 34 of 2020, Canada had recorded 17,888 excess deaths. By week 34 of 2021, Canada had recorded 18,498 excess deaths. But by week 34 of 2022, Canada had recorded 25,333 excess deaths, representing a 42% increase on the excess deaths recorded in 2020, prior to the roll-out of the Covid-19 injections.
This dramatic increase in excess deaths raises serious questions about the safety of the Covid-19 vaccines and whether they may have been a contributing factor to the increase in excess deaths.
The USA suffered 674,954 excess deaths in 2021, and then 434,520 excess deaths by week 49 of 2022. This equates to over 1.1 million excess deaths in nearly two years.
The USA suffered a staggering 674,954 excess deaths in 2021, a year that saw the country coerced into coming forward to get injected multiple times throughout the mass roll-out of the Covid-19 vaccines. These numbers represent a significant increase in deaths compared to previous years and have raised alarm bells among the public and healthcare professionals alike.
The situation did not improve in 2022, with 434,520 excess deaths recorded by week 49, bringing the total number of excess deaths to over 1.1 million in nearly two years.
This is a staggering number and has led to questions about the effectiveness of the vaccine and the government’s response to the alleged pandemic.
The official narrative put forth by governments and health organizations has been that deaths in 2020 increased due to the outbreak of the alleged Covid-19 pandemic, with the response to it adversely affecting millions of people worldwide.
However, as the pandemic progressed and a vaccine was developed and distributed, the narrative shifted to focus on the safety and effectiveness of the Covid-19 injection as a means to curb the spread of the virus and reduce the number of deaths.
This narrative was reinforced through various propaganda campaigns, public statements, and official statements, with the message that the vaccine was “safe and effective” and would be “the key to ending the pandemic”.
However, the figures and official reports released by governments in the USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the UK and most of Europe have shown that the opposite has happened, with millions of excess deaths being recorded since the mass roll-out of the Covid-19 injections.
This has led to many questions about the safety of the vaccine, the facts of the official narrative, and the integrity of Governments and Public Health bodies around the world.
The figures have been provided to both the Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) and EuroMOMO by each country’s Government organisations. The U.S. data has been provided by the Centers for Disease Control. The UK data has been provided by the Office for National Statistics. And Australia’s data has been provided by the Australian Bureau of Statistics.
So these aren’t independent estimates. They are official Government-authorized figures.
And they show that the ‘Five Eyes’ countries and 26 other countries across Europe suffered 1.99 million excess deaths up to week 34/49 of 2022 following the Emergency Use Authorization of the Covid-19 injections.
These figures cast a haunting shadow over the narrative surrounding the pandemic and raise concerns about the true impact of vaccination efforts. Especially when coupled with mortality rates per 100,000.
Mortality Rates are Lowest among the Unvaccinated
Official figures published by the UK Government suggest that Covid-19 vaccines may have been the biggest contributing factor to the millions of excess deaths seen across the ‘Five Eyes’ and most of Europe.
The figures can be found in a report titled ‘Deaths by Vaccination Status, England, 1 January 2021 to 31 May 2022‘, and it can be accessed on the ONS site here, and downloaded here.
Table 2 of the report contains the monthly age-standardised mortality rates by vaccination status by age group for deaths per 100,000 person-years in England up to May 2022.
We took the figures provided by the ONS for January to May 2022 and produced the following charts which reveal the horrific consequences of the mass Covid-19 vaccination campaign.
18 to 39-year-olds
The following chart shows the monthly age-standardised mortality rates by vaccination status among 18 to 39-year-olds for Non-Covid-19 deaths in England between January and May 2022 –
In every single month since the beginning of 2022, partly vaccinated and double vaccinated 18-39-year-olds have been more likely to die than unvaccinated 18 to 39-year-olds. Triple vaccinated 18 to 39-year-olds however have had a mortality rate that has worsened by the month following the mass Booster campaign that occurred in the UK in December 2021.
In January, triple vaccinated 18 to 39-year-olds were ever so slightly less likely to die than unvaccinated 18 to 39-year-olds, with a mortality rate of 29.8 per 100,000 among the unvaccinated and 28.1 per 100,000 among the triple vaccinated.
But this all changed from February onwards. In February, triple vaccinated 18 to 39-year-olds were 27% more likely to die than unvaccinated 18 to 39-year-olds, with a mortality rate of 26.7 per 100k among the triple vaccinated and 21 per 100k among the unvaccinated.
Things unfortunately got even worse for the triple vaccinated by May 2022 though. The data shows that triple vaccinated 18 to 39-year-olds were 52% more likely to die than unvaccinated 18 to 39-year-olds in May, with a mortality rate of 21.4 per 100k among the triple vaccinated and 14.1 among the unvaccinated.
The worst figures in 2022 were however among the partly vaccinated, with May seeing partly vaccinated 18 to 39-year-olds 202% more likely to die than unvaccinated 18 to 39-year-olds.
40 to 49-year-olds
The following chart shows the monthly age-standardised mortality rates by vaccination status among 40 to 49-year-olds for Non-Covid-19 deaths in England between January and May 2022 –
We see pretty much the same when it comes to 40 to 49-year-olds. In every single month since the beginning of 2022, partly vaccinated and double vaccinated 40 to 49-year-olds have been more likely to die than unvaccinated 40 to 49–year-olds.
The worst month for mortality rates among the partly and double vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated was February. This month saw partly vaccinated 40-49-year-olds 264% more likely to die than unvaccinated 40-49-year-olds. Whilst double vaccinated 40-49-year-olds were 61% more likely to die than unvaccinated 40-49-year-olds.
By May 2022, five months after the mass Booster campaign, triple vaccinated 40-49-year-olds were 40% more likely to die than unvaccinated 40-49-year-olds, with a mortality rate of 81.8 per 100k among the triple vaccinated and a mortality rate of 58.4 among the unvaccinated.
It’s the same old story in every single age group as you can see from the following two charts –
A full breakdown of the figures by each age group can be viewed here.
In light of these surprising findings, transparency and informed decision-making must take center stage. We need open dialogue, honest discussions, and ongoing research to address the questions raised by this report
Deagel’s Forecast and Current Events
The correlation between the alarming excess death figures reported by governments and Deagel’s apocalyptic depopulation forecast for 2025 is a topic that demands a closer examination.
Initially regarded as speculative, Deagel’s forecast gains credence as real-world events unfold, revealing a troubling alignment with the projections put forth by the organization. The stark increase in excess deaths, particularly in light of the forecasted depopulation scenario, prompts a critical evaluation of the forecast’s validity and the underlying factors contributing to these unsettling trends.
Government reports from multiple countries have highlighted a significant rise in excess deaths, surpassing what would be expected under normal circumstances. Excess deaths should have fallen following the roll-out of the Covid-19 injections if we we were really in the midst of a pandemic that was killing hundreds of thousands of people.
But these figures provide concrete evidence the opposite happened, and it cannot be easily dismissed. When juxtaposed with Deagel’s forecast, which predicts substantial population declines, the overlap raises legitimate questions about the potential accuracy of the forecast and the forces driving these distressing outcomes.
The correlation between the Government reports and Deagel’s apocalyptic depopulation forecast for 2025 simply cannot be ignored. Especially when we look at what has happened in terms of excess deaths among children.
Why are so many Children dying?
A troubling 120,000 excess deaths were recorded among the USA’s infants, children and young adults as of week 40 of 2022, and a curious rise in excess deaths among children across Europe was recorded as soon as the European Medicines Agency (EMA) extended the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the Pfizer Covid-19 injection to children in the middle of 2021.
The following chart shows the official CDC figures for all deaths and excess deaths among children and young adults across the USA prior to the roll-out of the Covid-19 vaccine, and after the roll-out of the Covid-19 vaccines on the 14th Dec. 2020. The figures have been provided to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC).
The above figures reveal that the year 2022 so far has only seen 1,352 fewer excess deaths among 0-44-year-olds by week 40 than what occurred by week 51 in 2022, despite the year 2020 being the alleged height of the COVID pandemic and also including an extra 11 weeks worth of deaths.
But the most concerning figures revealed in the above chart are the overall number of deaths and excess deaths among children and young adults since the roll-out of the Covid-19 injections.
Nearly half a million people aged 0 to 44 have sadly died since week 51 of 2020, and this has resulted in an astounding 117,719 excess deaths against the 2015-2019 five-year average.
The following chart has been created using the figures found in the OECD database. Figures that have been provided to the OEC by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC). And it shows excess deaths among children and young adults aged 0-44 across the USA by week in 2020 and 2021.
The official figures reveal that there was a slight increase in excess deaths among children and young adults when the alleged Covid-19 pandemic hit the US in early 2020.
However, with the introduction of a Covid-19 injection, one would have expected deaths to have fallen significantly among the age group in 2021. But instead, the opposite happened.
And official figures provided by the CDC, unfortunately, show that trend has continued in 2022.
The average life expectancy in the USA as of 2020 was 77.28 years. If we are to believe the official narrative that Covid-19 is a deadly disease then we could perhaps agree that 231,987 children and young adults up to the age of 44 dying in 2020 resulting in 40,365 excess deaths was an unfortunate consequence of this disease.
But if we are to believe the official narrative that Covid-19 injections are safe and effective, then how can one explain the further increase in death among children and young adults in both 2021 and 2022?
Because we know millions of Americans were coerced into getting the injections, and we know millions of parents were coerced into forcing their children to also get the same injections.
The answer lies in the fact that the official narrative is an outright lie. The Covid-19 vaccines are neither. And this is supported by official Government data coming out of Europe.
Several analysis of data from across Europe has sadly found a concerning link between the approval of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine for children and an increase in excess deaths among children. With the latest finding a 760% increase in excess deaths.
The data has been provided to an organization called EuroMOMO by the relevant official statistical departments of each country in Europe. The data we analyzed covered up to week 12 2023 and was gathered from 27 participating European countries.
For context, there are actually 44 countries in Europe and the latest data does not include deaths in Ukraine. Therefore, the ongoing war cannot be blamed for what we found.
In week 21 of 2021, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) extended emergency use authorization of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine to children aged 12 to 15, and a few months later extended it to 5 to 11-year-olds.
But in the weeks following the approval, a shocking rise in excess deaths among children was reported. And the rise in excess deaths has continued ever since.
Between week 22 of 2021 and week 52 of 2021, there were 754 excess deaths among 0 to 14-year-old children.
In contrast, between week 1 and week 21 of 2021, there were 309 fewer deaths than expected. The increase in excess deaths correlates perfectly with the EMA’s approval of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine for children aged 12 to 15.
Sadly the increase in deaths among children continued between week 1 and week 52 of 2022. The data shows that there were 1,358 excess deaths among children aged 0 to 14 across 27 countries in Europe.
And as of week 12 of 2023, there have been 336 excess deaths, bringing the total number of excess deaths to 2,448 during the 95 weeks following the EMA’s Emergency Use Approval of the Covid-19 vaccine for children.
This is a huge cause for concern because the previous 95 weeks from week 30 of 2019, to week 21 of 2021, saw 371 fewer deaths among children aged 0 to 14 than expected. With 360 excess deaths between weeks 30 and 52 of 2019.
Minus-422 excess deaths throughout the entirety of 2020.
And then minus-309 excess deaths between weeks 1 and week 21 of 2021.
This means excess deaths among children aged 0 to 14 across 27 countries across Europe, including the UK, Frane, Spain, Italy and most of Germany, increased by 760% as of week 12, 2023, ever since the European Medicines Agency extended the emergency use authorisation of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine to children aged 12 to 15.
A vaccine that was still in the early stages of development.
A type of “vaccine” never before used in Humans due to the risk of antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) and Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Disease (VAED).
And a vaccine that never needed to be administered to children because they were not at risk of suffering serious illness due to the alleged Covid-19 virus. As is evident from the 521 fewer deaths recorded among children aged 0 to 14 across Europe in 2020 from when the alleged Pandemic hit the continent to the end of the year.
Analyzing the Implications
Analyzing the implications of the government reports and their alignment with Deagel’s forecast provides valuable insights into the potential ramifications of these unsettling trends. The startling rise in excess deaths, particularly among the fully vaccinated population, raises significant concerns and demands a thorough examination of the underlying factors driving these outcomes.
The fact that a large proportion of the reported excess deaths occurred among the fully vaccinated population raises questions about the efficacy of the vaccines in providing adequate protection. Further investigation was needed at least two years ago to understand the potential reasons behind this unexpected trend.
Moreover, the implications extend beyond the realm of public health.
The alignment between the excess death figures and Deagel’s forecast suggests the potential for a significant demographic shift with far-reaching social, economic, and political consequences.
A drastic reduction in population size can affect labour markets, social welfare systems, and geopolitical dynamics, among other areas. Understanding and preparing for these implications becomes crucial for policymakers, stakeholders, and individuals alike.
However, the drastic reduction in population maybe works in the elites’ favour with the rapid emergence of Artificial Intelligence (AI).
The implications also raise broader questions about the overall strategy and approach taken in response to the global health crisis. If the excess deaths among the vaccinated population persist, which they have done now for at least two years, it becomes imperative to reevaluate the current vaccination strategies, monitoring systems, and public health policies.
Lessons must be learned from these real-world events to inform future decision-making and mitigate further potential risks to public health. The problem the ordinary, hard-working man and woman has is that vaccination as a whole has never been about health, it’s always been about creating significant wealth.
Furthermore, the alignment between the excess death figures and Deagel’s forecast underscores the need for transparency, accountability, and further independent research.
Thorough investigations, comprehensive data analysis, and peer-reviewed studies can shed light on the factors driving these unsettling trends and help inform evidence-based policies and interventions.
Open dialogue and collaboration among scientists, health professionals, and policymakers are vital to ensure the accuracy of information and the effectiveness of public health measures
But it can no longer be denied that the implications of the various Government reports’ and their convergence with Deagel’s forecast are profound and demand a thorough investigation. The problem we have is that we cannot rely on those in power to work in our best interests.
The Importance of Transparency and Accountability
In the face of such significant excess deaths and the potential realization of Deagel’s forecast, the need for transparency and accountability becomes paramount.
Governments, health organizations, and regulatory bodies must provide honest and comprehensive data, facilitating a clear understanding of the circumstances surrounding these tragic events. Full transparency will enable a thorough examination of the factors contributing to the excess deaths.
But this will not happen unless the public makes a song and dance about it.
Conclusion
The emergence of these quietly published government reports confirming over two million excess deaths since the mass roll-out of Covid-19 injections has cast a dark shadow over the prevailing narrative.
These figures bear a striking resemblance to Deagel’s apocalyptic depopulation forecast for 2025.
Of course, an increase in excess deaths alone does not necessarily mean that countries will suffer depopulation. This also depends on birth rates.
But sadly, the confidential Pfizer documents, which the U.S. Federal Drug Administration (FDA) tried to keep under lock and key for 75 years until a federal judge denied them the right to do this, confirm that mRNA Covid-19 vaccination has a significant effect on infertility, miscarriages, stillbirths and even birth defects.
Which you can read all about here –
Independent investigations and a commitment to accountability will help shed light on this crime against humanity. But we cannot rely on our current leaders to change the course of our future. We must confront these challenges ourselves and realise that there are billions of us and literally only a handful of them.
They only have power because we have been conditioned to give them it.
But with the emergence of AI, confirmation of millions of excess deaths strongly linked to Covid-19 vaccination, and significant effects on fertility confirmed by the once confidential Pfizer documents, the time to act is now, or Deagel’s apocalyptic depopulation forecast will become reality sooner than you think.
Read more at: Expose-News.com
https://tass.com/world/1680771
Sept 26, 2023
“Once the mission was completed, the typed papers and carbons were destroyed, thus leaving no physical trace,” the journalist wrote
WASHINGTON, September 26. /TASS/. The Americans that carried out the operation to destroy the Nord Stream underwater pipelines have left no traces, said US journalist and Pulitzer Prize winner Seymour Hersh.
“The American men and women who moved, under cover, in and out of Norway in the months it took to plan and carry out the destruction of three of the four Nord Stream pipelines in the Baltic Sea a year ago left no traces—not a hint of the team’s existence – other than the success of their mission,” he said in an article published on the Substack website.
“No significant information about the mission was put on a computer, but instead typed on a Royal or perhaps a Smith Corona typewriter with a carbon copy or two, as if the Internet and the rest of the online world had yet to be invented,” Hersh wrote. “The White House was isolated from the goings-on near Oslo; various reports and updates from the field were directly provided to CIA Director Bill Burns, who was the only link between the planners and the president who authorized the mission to take place on September 26, 2022. Once the mission was completed, the typed papers and carbons were destroyed, thus leaving no physical trace – no evidence to be dug up later by a special prosecutor or a presidential historian. You could call it the perfect crime.”
Hersh on February 8 published an article where he said, citing a source, that explosives under the Russian Nord Stream 1 and 2 pipelines were planted by US Navy divers, helped by Norwegian specialists, under the guise of the Baltops exercise in June 2022. The story stated US President Joe Biden personally authorized the operation after nine months of deliberations with the administration’s national security staff. The White House strongly denied that was the case.
German and US media later reported, citing sources, that a certain “pro-Ukrainian group” was allegedly involved in the sabotage. Ukraine strongly denied any involvement.
The Dutch broadcaster Nederlandse Omroep Stichting, or NOS, reported in mid-June, that a tip-off about the plot to attack the gas pipelines had been received from an informant in June 2022. The agency immediately passed the information to its counterparts at the CIA and to some other European countries, including Germany. The Die Zeit newspaper reported that the CIA then warned Ukraine against carrying out the attack.
© AP Photo / Markus Schreiber
sputnikglobe.com
Sept 6, 2023
Ekaterina Blinova
All materialsWrite to the author
The Biden administration blew up the Nord Stream pipelines in order to not lose its longstanding primacy in Western Europe, according to Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative journalist Seymour Hersh.
Exactly a year ago, three of four Nord Stream pipelines, designed to deliver 110 billion cubic meters per annum of Russian natural gas to Europe, were destroyed by a series of powerful blasts.
Less than half a year later, on February 8, Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative journalist Seymour Hersh exposed Team Biden’s apparent clandestine plan to destroy the pipelines, citing a knowledgeable anonymous source.
On the first anniversary of the sabotage, Hersh revealed that the secret operation’s major flaw, which resulted in the leak of the cover-up, was that Team Biden hid the real purpose of the plot even from its own intelligence operatives.
“There was a flaw – a gap in understanding between those who carried out the mission and President [Joe] Biden, as to why he ordered the destruction of the pipelines when he did,” the investigative journalist wrote on Tuesday. “This is the first account of that flaw, on the one-year anniversary of the explosions, and it is one President Biden and his national security team will not like.”
Nord Stream Blast: Why the West Still Can’t Name the Culprit
‘Deterrence’ to Prevent Ukraine Conflict
In December 2021, when Russia handed over its draft security agreements to the US and NATO concerning the military bloc’s non-enlargement and Kiev’s neutrality, National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan convened a series of high-level national security meetings that included CIA representatives. The idea was to come up with a deterrent that would stop Russian President Vladimir Putin from “invading” Ukraine.
It was decided that the destruction of the Nord Stream pipelines would be a perfect deterrence. Per Hersh, these pipelines were picked by Team Biden because they ran directly from Russia through the Baltic Sea to Germany, which made them accessible to the plotters and “totally deniable.” The US intelligence operatives tasked with the implementation of the plan believed that “the president would use the threat against Nord Stream as a deterrent to avoid the war,” the source told Hersh.
After the plan was agreed, then Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs Victoria Nuland and two weeks later Joe Biden stated that if Russia were to start a military operation in Ukraine, the Nord Stream pipelines would be stopped “one way or the other.”
On February 7, 2022, at a joint White House press conference with German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, Biden signaled: “If Russia invades — that means tanks and troops crossing . . . the border of Ukraine again, there will no longer be a Nord Stream 2. We will bring an end to it.”
The Obama, Trump, and Biden administrations had repeatedly expressed their strong opposition to the development of the Nord Stream project. In 2021, the Biden administration imposed pressure on Berlin, with Olaf Sholz suspending the Nord Stream 2 pipeline, which was ready to go in September 2021.
Biden Admin Blew Up Nord Stream Because US Feared Losing Primacy in Western Europe – Sy Hersh
What Was Team Biden’s Real Plan?
The investigative journalist highlighted that he was recently told that after Biden’s extraordinary public threat to blow up Nord Stream 2, “the CIA planning group was told by the White House that there would be no immediate attack on the two pipelines.” The group was directed to plant the necessary bombs and be ready to trigger them “on demand” — after the conflict began.
It was then that the small US planning group that was working in Oslo with the Royal Norwegian Navy and special services on the project understood that the attack on the pipelines was not a deterrent, because when the conflict started, they did not get the command, Hersh wrote, citing his source.
“We realized that the destruction of the two Russian pipelines was not related to the Ukrainian war […] but was part of a neocon political agenda to keep Scholz and Germany, with winter coming up and the pipelines shut down, from getting cold feet and opening up [the shuttered Nord Stream 2],” the journalist’s interlocutor said.
What’s more, the leadership of the CIA team saw the Biden administration’s “misleading guidelines for its order to destroy the pipelines” as taking “a strategic step toward World War III,” according to Hersh.
Denmark Fears Conducting Investigation With Russia Into Nord Stream Blasts – Ambassador
European Governments Knew About Nord Stream Plot
“Within days of the bombing, officials in Denmark and Sweden announced they would conduct an investigation. They reported two months later that there had indeed been an explosion and said there would be further inquiries. None has emerged. The German government conducted an inquiry but announced that major parts of its findings would be classified,” the investigative journalist wrote.
Hersh pointed out that even though Swedish and Danish officials continue to insist that they have no idea what happened in their territorial waters, they clearly saw the activities of American and Norwegian crews, but turned a blind eye to it: “The American team of divers and support staff on the mission’s mother ship—a Norwegian minesweeper—would be hard to hide while the divers were doing their work,” he remarked.
Moreover, Hersh revealed that Chancellor Scholz “was considered then – and now – by some members of the CIA team to be fully aware of the secret planning underway to destroy the pipelines.”
“Last winter German authorities allocated $286 billion in subsidies to major corporations and homeowners who faced higher energy bills to run their business and warm their homes. The impact is still being felt today, with a colder winter expected in Europe,” the investigative journalist underscored.
What’s Behind Decline of Germany?
Who Did It?
While the US government continues to deny the sabotage attack on the Nord Stream pipelines, all the facts, including the Biden administration’s unwillingness to investigate the issue, point to Washington, per the journalist. And the reason to do this was to tighten control over the US European allies, who are now suffering from inflation, economic slowdown, and energy uncertainty.
“The Biden administration blew up the pipelines but the action had little to do with winning or stopping the war in Ukraine. It resulted from fears in the White House that Germany would waver and turn on the flow of Russia gas – and that Germany and then NATO, for economic reasons, would fall under the sway of Russia and its extensive and inexpensive natural resources. And thus followed the ultimate fear: that America would lose its long-standing primacy in Western Europe,” Hersh concluded.
No, Biden Can’t Wage Forever War in Ukraine
26 August, 18:25 GMT