Wake up mofo
Wake up mofo
I hate lying when I should be truthing.
Adult website Pornhub has announced that it is now fully encrypted by default, following the US Republican representatives’ decision to allow Internet Service Providers to sell online users’ private data.
RT News
Visitors to Pornhub can now browse for explicit content without fear that their private porn history could be passed on to marketers.
The site has defaulted to HTTPS encryption, which can protect data such as user passwords entered into the site – a move its sister site YouPorn will replicate in April.
“With this Internet communication protocol we can ensure not only the security of our platform, but also that of our users,” Pornhub vice president Corey Price said in a statement.
YouPorn’s vice president Brad Burns echoed similar sentiments: “As one of the most viewed websites in the world, it is our duty to ensure the confidentially and safety of our users.”
“The transition to HTTPS will go a long way in solidifying our users’ privacy and protecting them against various types of malware. The data on our webpages will now be encrypted, making it significantly harder for third parties to penetrate,” he added.
Both sites have been praised for the move, which could influence other non-porn related websites to follow suit.
Bill S.J. Res. 34 reverses a Federal Communications Commission (FCC) privacy rule that required internet service providers (ISPs) to seek customer permission before sharing browsing history. The rule also made providers inform customers if any of the data was breached by hackers.
The new bill, which essentially eliminates internet privacy for US citizens, was voted through the House of Representatives by 215 Republican members of congress.
It allows ISPs to sell private browsing data to marketers and others without informing internet users.
Source: Researchers Discover Oldest Fossils on Earth, Predicts Life Exists on Other Planets
anonhq.com
The existence of life beyond Earth, popularly known as alien life, is a highly contentious issue among researchers. However, based on the available evidence, it appears those arguing that alien life exists or existed is winning the debate.
Since the mid-20th century, there has been a significant surge in the search for signs of alien intelligence by researchers. Radios have been deployed to detect possible extraterrestrial signals; telescopes have also been mounted to search for potentially habitable extra solar planets.
The British Theoretical Physicist, Professor Stephen Hawking explained some time ago that alien life exists. According to Hawking, in a universe with 100 billion galaxies, with each containing hundreds of millions of stars, it is unlikely that Earth is the only place where life has evolved. He said his brain has rationalized that there is life somewhere apart from what exists on Earth.
The Sunday Times quoted Hawking as saying: “To my mathematical brain, the numbers alone make thinking about aliens perfectly rational. The real challenge is working out what aliens might actually be like.”
Moving away from Professor Hawking and what his mathematical brain is telling him about alien life, a new study published in the journal Nature has shed some light on the topic. Although the objective of the study was not to look for alien life, the analytical stage of the study chanced upon a possible life somewhere apart from Earth.
A team of researchers from University College London discovered ancient fossils in Canada’s Nuvvuagittuq Supracrustal Belt, which hosts some of the oldest sedimentary rocks known on Earth. The tiny microfossils were found to be half the width of a human hair and up to half-a-millimeter in length. Their appearance is of blood-red tubes and filaments, formed by ocean-dwelling bacteria that fed on iron.
When the fossils were studied, the researchers found they are between 3.77 billion and 4.29 billion years old. This makes these fossils the oldest ever to be discovered. The oldest microfossils previously reported were found in Western Australia and dated to 3.46 billion years old.
Lead author of the study, Matthew Dodd was quoted by Reuters as saying that if the dating is accurate, it would represent an almost instantaneous emergence of life after ocean formation. He said the discovery represents a significant milestone, demonstrating life existed on Earth at its infancy.
The researchers said their discovery shows “direct evidence” that life existed on Earth 4 billion years ago. They also stated that the emergence of life could be simple enough to begin on other planets.
However, the researchers acknowledged skepticism about whether the discovered fossils are biological in nature, or merely natural mineral formations.
“One of the big questions when it comes to early life studies is whether or not the organic carbon we find in these rocks is actually biological in origin,” Dodd said.
To answer the big question, Dodd and his colleagues used several methods; including laser-imaging to analyze the minerals associated with the organic material. They concluded that the presence of two minerals in particular – apatite and carbonite – provide strong evidence for life.
Moreover, the researchers said they noted that the microfossils’ structure closely resembles modern bacteria that dwell near iron-rich hydrothermal vents. The researchers then theorized that there’s no reason to rule out similar evidence of early life being found on other planets.
“We could expect to find evidence for past life on Mars 4 billion years ago. If life happened so quickly on Earth, then could we expect it to be a simple process that could start on other planets?” Dodd asked, stating that Earth and Mars had liquid on their surfaces at the same time.
Of course, this is not the first time researchers are suspecting that life exists or might have existed on Mars. In November 2016, NASA said it was unable to rule out possible alien life somewhere in the universe. NASA reached this conclusion after it discovered methane gas on Mars in data brought to Earth by the Curiosity Rover, a car-sized robotic machine exploring Gale Crater on Mars as part of NASA’s Mars Science Laboratory mission.
According to NASA researchers, the methane gas may have been produced by bacteria on Mars. Most methane on Earth is produced as a waste gas by living organisms, but there are many non-biological processes that can also generate the gas.
Source: Does Springtime Makes Certain Politicians Even More Mental? | New Eastern Outlook
journal-neo.org
March 30, 2017
It is believed that springtime is a season of lovers and mental cases. It is in the spring that the symptoms of allergies and certain mental illnesses are generally exacerbated, and those physiologically unstable often suffer attacks of unmotivated activity and hallucination. It’s a documented fact that in the spring in a mental patient’s head voices are louder and they urge a person to act and act quickly.
Psychiatrists are convinced that the destructive power of these symptoms depends on the nature and stage of development of one’s disease, along with patient’s mental limitations. Psychiatrists often joke about the fact that there are no healthy people, only undiagnosed ones, but in general it’s easier to diagnose a person in spring than in winter or summer.
It is difficult to state with certainty how much more often seasonal exacerbations occur in politicians than in ordinary mortals. It’s a common joke that in order to go insane one must have a brain, and certain political figures have shown no signs of possessing one. But by putting jokes aside, one may note that a cook that has gone mental in the worst case scenario can completely ruin a dish, but with a politician hit by a similar scenario can lead his country to grave consequences.
It is therefore not surprising that a great many of wars and revolutions began in the spring. Take, at least the conflicts in Syria, Iraq, and Vietnam.
Certain announcement made by the rich and powerful in springtime continue fascinating political analysts and historians alike. For instance, in the spring of 2004 George Bush Junior made a pretty peculiar statement, by saying that: “I’m honored to shake the hand of a brave Iraqi citizen who had his hand cut off by Saddam Hussein.“
However, such statements are just the icing on a cake. For instance, US Secretary of Defense James Forrestal in the spring of 1949 jumped out of a window, crying “The Russians are coming. The Russians are coming. They’re right around. I’ve seen Russian soldiers.” However, this is not always the case with mental cases, as the French Prime Minister Pierre Bérégovoy was particularly quiet before his death. On May 1, 1993 he demanded his bodyguard to hand him a gun and put two bullets into his head.
However, it seems that American politicians are more inclined to suffer from mental conditions associated with springtime than any other politicians in the world. It’s been over two months since Trump took office, but we still hear announcement about Russia’s meddling in the elections, even though no evidence of any has been presented to this very date. Yet, Former Vice President Dick Cheney would announce at the Economic Times Global Business Summit in New Delhi that: “Putin and his government, his organization, to interfere in major ways with our basic, fundamental democratic processes. In some quarters that would be considered an act of war.”
It’s curious that the Wall Street Journal has already announced that President Donald Trump’s ties to Russia are becomingly slightly more concerning to Americans, including significant portions of his own political base, and yet remain a low-priority issue for many people, as a new poll found. Moreover, the absence of such ties has already been announced by a number of leading US intelligence agencies, yet Dick Cheney won’t let go, since he’s convinced that Russia is about to invade Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. Unfortunately, he fails to provide any logical explanation that could back such claims up.
A lot has already been said about America’s “heavyweight Senator”John McCain, who has come under heavy criticism lately for the fact that he has routinely advocated the sacrifice of US interests while pushing for confrontation and sometimes war with a long list of countries around the globe: Serbia, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Iran, North Korea and, worst of all, Russia. There is scarcely a conflict he doesn’t want the United States to plunge into. What’s even worse, rarely a military deployment he advocates to start is not going to be permanent. Whatever the international issue, he sees US military action as the answer.
The National Interest has already noted that Senator McCain’s lack of geopolitical sense has been on dramatic display with the issue of NATO expansion. Never mind that the transatlantic alliance was created to promote US security. In recent years NATO has added numerous nations that are security black holes, offering far more costs than benefits.
This media source would go as far as to announce that the latest wannabe security dependent with Senator McCain’s backing is Montenegro, a postage stamp country with maximum political conflicts and minimum military capabilities. If Senator McCain believes Montenegro aids the United States, he is living in a parallel universe. His mental confusion is even greater if he actually believes Montenegro is under attack.
However, politicians are not the only ones affected by springtime, it’s curious that immediately after the deadly rampage near Parliament in London, British conservative journalist Louise Mensch would tweet that the terrorist attack has “got everything to do with Russia.”
One can’t help but wonder are the above mentioned politicians are going to act as sane human beings in the summer. Let’s wait and see.
Jean Périer is an independent researcher and analyst and a renowned expert on the Near and Middle East, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook.”
Source: Why you must reset your circadian clock to live a healthier, happier life – NaturalNews.com
With permission from
NaturalNews.com
by: Lance D Johnson
March 29, 2017
(Natural News) In the human body, biological rhythms are in motion every day. It’s how the body adapts. Physiological processes and behaviors are regulated within a 24 hour circadian clock. This internal clock allows our bodies to prepare for the changes that come with day and night, sleep and wakefulness, activity and non-activity. These rhythms are affected by light and energy input; therefore, sleep, waking patterns, and dietary habits influence this tedious circadian clock.Disruptions occur to this internal rhythm. Working late into the night and peering into screens of artificial light can change how the body perceives day and night, confusing the natural rhythm of biological processes. Eating at unpredictable times can affect this process too.
The endocrine system of the body, which governs the release of key hormones, operates in biological rhythm. Scientists at the University of Geneva studied the internal clocks governing hormone secretion for two types of pancreatic cells. These cells, in charge of insulin and glucagon production, operate at specific times that are influenced by the anticipation of feeding-fasting cycles and resting-activity cycles. If activity and eating times are unpredictable, then the orchestrated release of these crucial hormones is misaligned and thrown off rhythm.
The researchers found that metabolic problems explode when the circadian rhythm of the individual is misaligned. Resetting this internal clock is key to living a healthier, more disease-free life. Many cases of Type-2 diabetes can be traced back to abnormal rhythm of metabolic processes.
A number of factors can affect biological rhythms, including time changes, shift changes at work, long flights, and sleepless nights of study or partying. Ancestors understood the importance of sleeping when the sun was down and waking with the sunrise. This study shows the importance of eating and being active at regular times during the day.
This does not mean that every cell is on the same clock, but it does indicate that the body coordinates metabolic processes in rhythm. Not all cellular processes occur at the same time; therefore, the body must optimize energy levels for sleep and wake cycles to best distribute energy for periods of activity and inactivity. As the researchers have found, timely insulin secretion is part of this process.
The researchers studied the rhythms and interactions of insulin-producing α-cells and glucagon-producing β-cells, in vivo and in vitro.
“Contrary to what we thought, these cellular clocks appear to be slightly distinct, which helps fine-tune the secretion of insulin and glucagon, and thus maintains glucose homeostasis,” says Dr. Charna Dibner of the UNIGE Faculty of Medicine. He says both of these cellular clocks coordinate to adapt to the feeding and fasting state of the individual. “Misalignments of these cell clocks may therefore lead to the disruption of hormone secretion and glucose homeostasis, and to the development of metabolic diseases such as obesity and diabetes,” he said.
To test the rhythmic activity of the islet cells, the Geneva scientists conducted parallel high-throughput RNA sequencing on the cells at multiple times within a 24 hour period. After recording 19,000 transcripts of the gene expression, they were able to identify functional genes in the pancreas and exactly how their temporal regulation process occurs. This cellular rhythm was then compared to the cellular rhythm that occurs in mouse cells. “The mice whose pancreatic islets lack cellular clocks do develop type 2 diabetes, indicating that the disruption of cell rhythms is sufficient to perturb normal hormonal secretion and regulation of glucose homeostasis,” says Charna Dibner.
The researchers concluded that metabolic imbalances can occur when internal clocks are misaligned and adversely affected by the lifestyle choices of an individual in relation to the light of day and the darkness of night. This research suggests the importance of setting and maintaining circadian rhythm for healthy metabolic processes. (RELATED: For more news on prevention, check out Prevention.News.)
Sources include:
Go home bloody stupid Yanks and fix your own country.
“What are Americans doing in the Persian Gulf? They had better get out of this region and not cause trouble for the countries in the region,” Dehqan said in a statement carried by Iranian state media on Thursday.
Source: US is like ‘armed robber breaking into your house’ – Iranian defense minister — RT News
“What are Americans doing in the Persian Gulf? They had better get out of this region and not cause trouble for the countries in the region,” Dehqan said in a statement carried by Iranian state media on Thursday.
He also compared the United States to a home intruder.
“Is it acceptable for an armed robber to enter your house and expect to get the red carpet treatment?
“This is an example of modern ignorance in the 21st century,” he said.
Dehqan’s was responding to remarks made earlier in March by United States Central Command General Joseph Votel, who accused Iran of being a destabilizing influence in the region.
“We are also dealing with a range of malign activities perpetrated by Iran and its proxies operating in the region,” Votel said at a hearing before the Senate Armed Services Committee in describing Tehran’s alleged influence over Iraq and Syria.
“It is my view that Iran poses the greatest long-term threat to stability for this part of the world,” he said.
The statements made by military officials on both sides reflect the growing tensions between Iran and the United States. On Saturday, Iranian officials denied that its fast-attack boats had “harassed” an American aircraft carrier passing through the Strait of Hormuz last week, while, earlier in March, the Iranian Navy accused a US tracking ship of changing course to head towards Iranian Revolutionary Guard boats, calling the conduct “unprofessional.” The US Navy responded with counter-claims, however, alleging that it was the Iranian boats that had chased the US ship, risking “miscalculation or an accidental provocation.”
A set of ballistic missile tests carried out by Iran has further enraged Washington, the latest of which came just in early March, when Iran announced it had successfully fired the Hormuz-2 naval missile capable of hitting targets within a range of 300 kilometers (180 miles). The US rolled out new sanctions against the Islamic Republic in turn.
Source: 26 Strikingly Beautiful Photographs That Had No Help From Photoshop
wimp.com
March 31, 2017
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: we live in a beautiful world. If you know where to look, there are some truly stunning sights to behold out there. If you still need more convincing, here are some gorgeous examples.
On this episode of “Watching the Hawks” Tyrel Ventura and Tabetha Wallace look at the DEA’s over 3 billion dollar money making machine addiction to Civil Asset Forfeiture. Then Tabetha breaks down how much unreplaceable water is wasted in the industrial food creation business. Next, Sean Stone sits down with the former stockbroker turned meth dealer and now prison reform activist Shaun Attwood to discuss just how ridiculous the U.S. prison system is. Finally, Watching The Hawks applauds the record breaking spacewalk by female astronaut Peggy Whitson.
Source: Gang of Thieves: DEA Stole $3.2 Billion in Cash From Innocent People in Only a Decade
blacklistednews.com
March 30, 2017
Source: 2017 – Year of New World Order NWO Anniversaries – Part 2 | The Freedom Articles
freedom-articles.toolsforfreedom.com
Makia Freeman
March 30, 2017
1917 was undoubtedly a big year for humanity. To cap it all off, after the manipulated entry of the US into WW1 and the hallmark Balfour Declaration, we saw a violent and bloody coup take place in Russia, the biggest country on Earth in terms of land area, with a powerful military to boot. However, to name it the “Russian Revolution” is not really representative of what happened. It may be more aptly named the Illuminati Revolution, Illuminati Russian Revolution or even the Jewish Communist Revolution. Why? The reason is that the idea of communism was developed by primarily Jewish thinkers in the late 19th century, funded by primarily Jewish international bankers and executed by at least 1 man (Lev Davidovich Bronstein) who took on a Russian-sounding name – “Leon Trotsky” – to hide his Jewish-sounding name, lest the whole gig be discovered by the Russian public, farmers and peasants. (To be clear, this is not to say that all Jews are in favor of communism or are communists, which would be absurd. It also not to say that the entire NWO conspiracy is a Jewish conspiracy, for that is just one strand of it. However, the Jewish influence on communism and the Russian Revolution is marked and undeniable.)
The truth is that the very richest men in the world, located one block off Wall Street in New York (120 S. Broadway) in a building owned by DuPont, secretly financed the Russian Revolution. Earlier in 1917, before the more significant of the pair of Russian Revolutions took place in November, Vladimir Lenin was in Switzerland and Leon Trotsky was in New York as a penniless immigrant. These 2 fellows were anything but “homegrown” or “grassroots” Russians – they were imports who weren’t even living there at the time! Reminds me of the way NWO manipulator George Soros funds countless NGOs and movements to make them look organic and spontaneous. In Russia in 1917, the propaganda was obviously thick enough that Lenin and Trotsky were accepted as leaders of the revolution.
An excellent source of information for how exactly Lenin and Trotsky were positioned and moved into power can be found in the works of former professor Anthony Sutton, who wrote books such as Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution, Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler, Wall Street and FDR. In these meticulously researched books he shows how the NWO manipulators used the cover of Red Cross to help the Bolsheviks (which he proves using declassified US Government documents). The fact is that the NWO conspirators were shaping the political agenda for Russia, Germany and the US all at the same time: they were behind the Soviet’s first 5 year plan, they were behind the rise of Nazism and they wrote Roosevelt’s New Deal. Who are “they” exactly? The Rothschilds and the Rockefellers, as well as their international banking colleagues such as the Morgans, their companies such as Kuhn, Loeb & Co. (whose management included Jacob Schiff, Felix Warburg, Otto Kahn, Mortimer Schiff and Jerome Hanauer [all Jewish]), their agents such as Colonel Mandell House, and their puppet politicians such as Woodrow Wilson. Sutton writes:
“”You will have a revolution, a terrible revolution. What course it takes will depend much on what Mr. Rockefeller tells Mr. Hague to do. Mr. Rockefeller is a symbol of the American ruling class and Mr. Hague is a symbol of its political tools.” – Leon Trotsky, in New York Times, December 13, 1938. (Hague was a New Jersey politician)
…
President Woodrow Wilson was the fairy godmother who provided Trotsky with a passport to return to Russia to “carry forward” the revolution. This American passport was accompanied by a Russian entry permit and a British transit visa. Jennings C. Wise, in Woodrow Wilson: Disciple of Revolution, makes the pertinent comment, “Historians must never forget that Woodrow Wilson, despite the efforts of the British police, made it possible for Leon Trotsky to enter Russia with an American passport.”
President Wilson facilitated Trotsky’s passage to Russia at the same time careful State Department bureaucrats, concerned about such revolutionaries entering Russia, were unilaterally attempting to tighten up passport procedures.
…
‘The question now in the readers’ minds must be, were these bankers also secret Bolsheviks? No, of course not. The financiers were without ideology. It would be a gross misinterpretation to assume that assistance for the Bolshevists was ideologically motivated, in any narrow sense. The financiers were power-motivated and therefore assisted any political vehicle that would give them an entree to power: Trotsky, Lenin, the tsar, Kolchak, Denikin — all received aid, more or less. All, that is, but those who wanted a truly free individualist society.”
All these “isms” – communism, bolshevism, fascism, nazism, socialism, capitalism, etc. – are designed to confuse people, create fake opposites and spurn future conflict. When you look at Hitler and Stalin, and their 2 mad regimes, was there much difference between them? They both set up incredibly centralized and authoritarian control systems, and killed their enemies domestically and abroad. We are told that Hitler was a fascist on the far right, and that Stalin was a communist on the far left, yet they are basically the same. In fact, at that time during the 1930s, you could call all the political systems in all 3 countries (Russia, Germany and the USA) socialist, since Hitler’s party was the National Socialists or Nazis for short.
Exactly 50 years ago in 1967, a short lived war took place in the Middle East that had the potential to embroil the US and the Soviet Union in a hot war. It was an Israeli-Arab war known as the 6-day war which still has geopolitical ramifications to day. The official narrative in the West, influenced by the Zionists, was that Israel was defending itself. Where have we heard that one before? The truth is the opposite; Israel launched an attack against Egypt and invaded the entire Sinai peninsula. Israel attacked first. Here is the background in an article by Jeremy Hammond:
“The President of Egypt, then known as the United Arab Republic (UAR), Gamal Abdel Nasser, later conveyed to U.S. President Lyndon Johnson that his troop buildup in the Sinai Peninsula prior to the war had been to defend against a feared Israeli attack. In a meeting with Nasser, Johnson’s special envoy to the UAR, Robert B. Anderson, expressed U.S. puzzlement over why he had massed troops in the Sinai, to which Nasser replied, “Whether you believe it or not, we were in fear of an attack from Israel. We had been informed that the Israelis were massing troops on the Syrian border with the idea of first attacking Syria, there they did not expect to meet great resistance, and then commence their attack on the UAR.”
Anderson then told Nasser “that it was unfortunate the UAR had believed such reports, which were simply not in accordance with the facts”, to which Nasser responded that his information had come from reliable sources (presumably referring to intelligence information passed along by the USSR).
…
Yitzhak Rabin, who would later become Prime Minister, told Le Monde the year following the ’67 war, “I do not think Nasser wanted war. The two divisions which he sent to the Sinai, on May 14, would not have been sufficient to start an offensive against Israel. He knew it and we knew it.”
Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin acknowledged in a speech in 1982 that its war on Egypt in 1956 was a war of “choice” and that, “In June 1967 we again had a choice. The Egyptian army concentrations in the Sinai approaches do not prove that Nasser was really about to attack us. We must be honest with ourselves. We decided to attack him.””
So Egypt was basically scared Israel would attack, so Egypt massed their military along the border, which Israel took as a sign Egypt would attack – so then Israel attacked first. The CIA knew that Israel had enough military muscle to prevail against Egypt, Syria and Jordan.
“Four days before Israel’s attack on Egypt, [Director of Central Intelligence Richard] Helms met with a senior Israeli official who expressed Israel’s intent to go to war, and that the only reason it hadn’t already struck was because of efforts by the Johnson administration to restrain both sides to prevent a violent conflict.
“Helms interpreted the remarks as suggesting that Israel would attack very soon”, writes Robarge. He reported to Johnson “that Israel probably would start a war within a few days.”
“Helms was awakened at 3:00 in the morning on 5 June by a call from the CIA Operations Center”, which had received the report “that Israel had launched its attack” and that, contrary to Israel’s claims that Egypt had been the aggressor, Israel had fired first.”
The consequences of the 6-day war were grave for many of the Arabian states surrounding Israel. The Zionist regime, as has always been its goal, expanded its territory by theft and force in order to fulfill the mission of establishing greater Israel (“all the land from the Niles to the Euphrates”). These days many nations (and international bodies like the UN) constantly talk of a return to the pre-1967 borders as a condition for peace, which means a return to the territorial boundaries as they were before the 6-day war. Yes, Israel returned some of the land it stole during the 6-day war, but not all of it; for example, it still retains control of the Golan Heights which it took from Syria.
During the 6-day war, which occurred from June 5th to 10th, 1967, another infamous incident happened which deserves recognition of its own. I refer to the Israeli false flag attack on the USS Liberty, a colossal act of treachery where Israel shot at an American ship at a time when the US had already become one of its biggest allies. LBJ was the US President at the time and was much friendlier to the Zionist regime than JFK (who had challenged Ben-Gurion over Israeli nukes at Dimona). LBJ was in on the JFK assassination and was clearly a man with little scruples. He had already signed off on the 1964 Gulf of Tonkin incident, where the US pretended its ships were being attacked so as to have an excuse to start a war with North Vietnam.
The idea of this false flag op was to frame Egypt, so that the US would think that Egypt was attacking its vessels, and thus join the 6-day war on the side of the Israelis against the Arabs. At 6:05am in the morning, the sailors on the USS Liberty waved at the Israeli pilots, whose jets they recognized because they had the Star of David. At 2:00 pm, the Israeli jets attacked. They first took out all antennae with heat-seeking missiles. The attack lasted as long as the attack on Pearl Harbor. The Israelis put napalm on the bridge of the USS Liberty ship, killing 34 and wounding 172. The Israelis jets later covered up the Star of David.
After the aerial attack, torpedo boats came, shot, lifted the boat out of the water, and almost caused it to sink. Admiral McCain (Senator John McCain’s father) ordered the investigation to be completed within 1 week (which was impossible), rushing it so that it could remain a cover-up.
Mike Rivero writes about the captains and admirals who exposed this false flag incident:
“A former Navy attorney who helped lead the military investigation of the 1967 Israeli attack on the USS Liberty that killed 34 American servicemen says former President Lyndon Johnson and his defense secretary, Robert McNamara, ordered that the inquiry conclude the incident was an accident.
In a signed affidavit released at a Capitol Hill news conference, retired Capt. Ward Boston said Johnson and McNamara told those heading the Navy’s inquiry to “conclude that the attack was a case of ‘mistaken identity’ despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.”
It was “one of the classic all-American cover-ups,” said retired Admiral Thomas Moorer, a former Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman who spent a year investigating the attack as part of an independent panel he formed with other former military officials. The panel also included a former US ambassador to Saudi Arabia, James Akins.
“Why would our government put Israel’s interests ahead of our own?” Moorer asked from his wheelchair at the news conference. He was chief of naval operations at the time of the attack.”
I can answer that question for Moorer: it’s because Israel has its tentacles deep within the US Government and controls it to a very large degree.
False flag operations have long been a Zionist speciality, including the fake radio transmitter that tricked Reagan into attacking Libya as well as 911 itself. Israel has been framing Arabs for decades. Now in 2017, more than ever, it’s time for the world to wake up to these NWO anniversaries.
*****
Makia Freeman is the editor of alternative media / independent news site The Freedom Articles and senior researcher at ToolsForFreedom.com, writing on many aspects of truth and freedom, from exposing aspects of the worldwide conspiracy to suggesting solutions for how humanity can create a new system of peace and abundance.
Sources:
*http://reformed-theology.org/html/books/bolshevik_revolution/chapter_02.htm
*https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2010/07/04/israels-attack-on-egypt-in-june-67-was-not-preemptive/
*https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1964-68v19/d500
*http://freedom-articles.toolsforfreedom.com/unfortunate-fulfillment-israeli-mission-statement/
*http://freedom-articles.toolsforfreedom.com/kennedy-assassination-who-how-why-part-3/
*http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/ussliberty.html
*http://freedom-articles.toolsforfreedom.com/remembering-israel-911-role/
*http://freedom-articles.toolsforfreedom.com/zionism-vs-islam/
Source: Russia Preparing For Potential Removal From International Banking System
theantimedia
By Whitney Webb / Republished with permission / MintPress News
March 29, 2017
(MPN) In 2011, a Swiss study confirmed what many already knew or suspected: bankers run the world. The study, completed by the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich, found that “a large portion of control flows to a small tightly-knit core of financial institutions,” essentially forming a network of global corporate control. This economic “super-entity,” as the authors called it, dominates the international banking system.
Among the most influential entities in the system are international financial institutions like the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication (SWIFT). These institutions represent the only source of financial recourse for nations that require the services they offer, as no alternatives have existed until quite recently.
The World Bank and the IMF, for instance, provide financial support to developing nations and member states, serving as the last resort for governments that are in a state of financial ruin or that are set to default on their debt. SWIFT, on the other hand, provides a much different service – offering financial institutions the means to send and receive messages from other such institutions in a secure manner. Without SWIFT access, nations and the businesses operating within them become unable to complete international transactions and are thus cut off from the global economy at large.
While each of these institutions and service providers are ostensibly unbiased towards the politics of any given nation, the undue influence of countries like the United States has made itself known within these institutions, with the U.S. using their power to force political or economic changes within any number of countries. John Perkins, author of Confessions of an Economic Hitman, described the World Bank’s activities as “pure economic colonization on behalf of power corporations and banks that use the United States government as their tool.”
The U.S.’ influence over key financial institutions has pushed other countries, namely the BRICS group and other economic rivals to American hegemony, to build their own alternatives. Years of efforts to create rival institutions culminated in 2015, when the 100-billion dollar BRICS-funded New Development Bank (NDB) was launched, a move widely recognized as a direct challenge to the supremacy of the U.S. dollar as an international reserve currency. This was heightened just months later, when China launched the China International Payment System (CIPS), which aimed to reduce the nation’s reliance on SWIFT while also propelling its own currency into greater international prominence.
One of the factors that drove the push to consolidate international banking alternatives in 2015 was the Ukrainian coup of 2014 and subsequent threats by Western countries to isolate Russia from the international financial order. Following Western accusations of Russian aggression in Ukraine and the subsequent annexation of the Crimea after a contested referendum vote, Western nations called for sweeping economic retaliation against Russia, including banning them from SWIFT entirely and essentially paralyzing the banking system within the Crimea.
Russia was not ultimately banned from SWIFT, but the threat of being prohibited from the dominant means of realizing financial transactions made it clear to Russia and other BRICS nations that their dependency on the Western-dominated international financial system was not in their best interest. Iran’s prohibition from using the SWIFT system from 2012 to 2015 made it clear that the West, and particularly the U.S., could and would use its influence within international banking institutions to cripple a nation’s economy for geopolitical reasons.
Not willing to wait for the next attempt by Western countries to cut it off from key financial institutions and services, Russia has now created an alternative to SWIFT to protect its economy and financial sector. Western governments have yet to respond to the creation of this alternative system.
During a meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin last Wednesday, Central Bank governor Elvira Nabiullina stated that:
“There were threats that we can be disconnected from SWIFT. We have finished working on our own payment system, and if something happens, all operations in SWIFT format will work inside the country. We have created an alternative.”
The alternative system, known by its abbreviation SPFS, is analogous to SWIFT for financial transactions taking place in Russia and has been in the works for years, with 330 Russian banks connected over a year ago. This number will likely increase now that it has been successfully developed and implemented. Nabiullina also added during the meeting that 90 percent of ATMs in Russia are now compatible with Mir, a Russian version of the Visa and Mastercard payment systems that is used domestically. However, the SPFS is still far from perfect, not operating from 9 pm to 5 am Moscow time and with a transfer cost of 5 cents per transaction.
Whether Russia’s aim in creating and implementing an alternative to SWIFT is based chiefly on protecting its own economy or not, the move further illustrates how the concentration of international power is steadily moving eastward. Along with parallel efforts by China and other BRICS nations, U.S. and Western economic hegemony is unraveling, a stark reality that U.S. interests – particularly those of the “deep state” – are desperate to avoid.
The U.S. and its allies have taken to using geopolitical pressure and economic threats, like banning nations from SWIFT, in order to accomplish this – a move that ironically seems to be pushing more countries away from U.S.-dominated economic systems and into the arms of its direct competitors.